This research is part of the EXCLIM Project (Exil Climatique: Gérer les Déplacements des Populations Dus aux Phénomènes Climatiques Extrêmes) and has been funded by the French Ministry of the Environment (MEDDAAT). More information is available on this website: http://www.reseau-terra.eu/rubrique180.html.
Climate Change and Reorganizing Land Use: Flood Control Areas as a Network Effect
Version of Record online: 30 JUL 2012
© 2012 Urban Research Publications Limited
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Volume 37, Issue 6, pages 2001–2013, November 2013
How to Cite
Bruzzone, S. (2013), Climate Change and Reorganizing Land Use: Flood Control Areas as a Network Effect. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37: 2001–2013. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01162.x
- Issue online: 24 OCT 2013
- Version of Record online: 30 JUL 2012
- French Ministry of the Environment (MEDDAAT)
- climate change;
- actor-network theory;
- land use;
Although climate change appears to be a relatively new public issue, it has not emerged onto a tabula rasa; it affects ‘traditional’ policy sectors. How, then, does this ‘new issue’ interact with established organizational processes, and how is climate change ‘operationalized’ in local practice? Since major events linked to climate change include such things as desertification, climatic migrations, floods and landslides, one might assume that one of its main implications would be a substantial change in land use, or at least a transformation in land organization and management. This article explores the implementation of a ‘flood control area’ as an adaptation practice in the face of climate change. What theoretical and empirical tools should analysis adopt to account for the multiple actors, types of knowledge, artefacts, socio-technical systems and governance configurations engaged in developing such practices? In other words, to what extent does climate change become a reorganizing category? This article adopts a theoretical approach inspired by actor-network theory and considers adaptation practice not as a standardized top-down solution, but as the result of specific local connections among actors, materials and discourses. The analysis suggests that climate change is indeed a reorganizing category, but one that depends on the specific local materializations of the adaptation measure.