I would like to thank Frank Cody, Cynthia Isenhour, Melissa Checker, Gary McDonogh and two IJURR reviewers for their comments on earlier drafts. I also would like to thank members of PODER and SOS for giving me the time to undertake interviews, the staff at Austin's History Center forresearch support and Josh Rosenblatt for his excellent copywriting abilities.
Contesting Sustainability: ‘SMART Growth’ and the Redevelopment of Austin's Eastside
Article first published online: 23 AUG 2012
© 2012 Urban Research Publications Limited
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Volume 37, Issue 1, pages 297–310, January 2013
How to Cite
Tretter, E. M. (2013), Contesting Sustainability: ‘SMART Growth’ and the Redevelopment of Austin's Eastside. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37: 297–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01166.x
- Issue published online: 21 DEC 2012
- Article first published online: 23 AUG 2012
- Environmental Justice;
- Environmental Sustainability;
- SMART Growth;
The compatibility between an agenda for sustainable urban development and the neoliberal economic restructuring of urban space has been observed within cities in developed countries across the globe. From providing economic support to local ‘green’ industries to creating bike lanes, municipalities develop sustainability strategies that are designed to boost their competitive advantage. Moreover, municipalities are responding to demands from popular social movements and national governments that seek to reconfigure societal relationships with the natural environment in cities. Cities are increasingly understood not as part of the ecological crisis but as part of the solution, or as places where alternative patterns of sustainable consumption and new socially and ecologically responsible industries can be developed. Over the last decade in Austin, environmental sustainability has become an uncontested paradigm that has progressively shaped the city's urban space and policy. Two competing conceptualizations of the environment, so-called ‘environmental’ and ‘just’ sustainability groups, are explored in this article. I demonstrate how the notion of environmental sustainability has been selectively incorporated into the hegemonic vision of Austin's strategic growth plan. I argue that the dominance of this conceptualization is best understood by asking what counts as the ‘environment’ for environmentalists, and understanding the unstated assumptions about the environment shared by the business community and environmentalists.