I would like to thank Kezia Barker, Andy Karvonen, Albena Yaneva, Isabelle Doucet and colleagues at the Manchester Architecture Research Centre for discussing versions of this article. I am also grateful to the anonymous IJURR reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.
Material Politics: Concrete Imaginations and the Architectural Definition of Urban Life in Le Corbusier's Master Plan for Buenos Aires
Article first published online: 11 DEC 2012
© 2012 Urban Research Publications Limited
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Volume 37, Issue 1, pages 238–258, January 2013
How to Cite
Minuchin, L. (2013), Material Politics: Concrete Imaginations and the Architectural Definition of Urban Life in Le Corbusier's Master Plan for Buenos Aires. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37: 238–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01203.x
- Issue published online: 21 DEC 2012
- Article first published online: 11 DEC 2012
- Material politics;
- Buenos Aires;
- Le Corbusier;
- Urban imaginations
Based on the example of Le Corbusier's design for a network of urban thoroughfares in Buenos Aires, this article examines the role of concrete in the invention of a new material imaginary, where novel structures were used to architecturally delimit the expressivity of urban life. The article is structured in two parts. The first part examines how materiality has been repositioned as a site of and for politics. I chart three different strands of material politics prevalent in contemporary urban theory: material politics as (1) the inscription of metabolic infrastructures, (2) the disruption of the sensible and (3) the assembling of socio-material entanglements. I then argue for the need to devise a definition of material politics that incorporates the notion of actualization and reflects the involvement of materials in the invention of and experimentation with alternative urban imaginaries. In the second part, I describe the assembly of Le Corbusier's proposed concrete biology for Buenos Aires by examining three interrelated mechanisms: valorization, circulation and abstraction. To conclude, I emphasize the methodological value of using the instance of materialization as a form of tracing the historical emergence and transformation of alternative forms of problematizing and imagining the production of urban space.