Anarchy, Failed States, and Armed Groups: Reconsidering Conventional Analysis
Article first published online: 27 MAY 2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00502.x
© 2008 International Studies Association
Additional Information
How to Cite
Vinci, A. (2008), Anarchy, Failed States, and Armed Groups: Reconsidering Conventional Analysis. International Studies Quarterly, 52: 295–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00502.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 27 MAY 2008
- Article first published online: 27 MAY 2008
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Systemic theories of international politics divide the world into anarchic and hierarchic systems. Conventionally, the boundary of each system is based on juridically defined territorial borders. This article argues that within collapsed and “fragmented” states there exist autonomous armed groups, which make these states by definition anarchic systems. Unlike earlier accounts of such “domestic anarchy,” this article argues that the domestic anarchy is “open” or connected to the international anarchic system. By taking this approach, it is possible to integrate the theoretical understanding of the relations between armed groups and (external) states. Specifically, the article illustrates how there can be “mixed security dilemmas” between states and armed groups, and that other theoretical concepts usually reserved for describing interstate relations can potentially be used to describe state-armed group relations.

1468-2478/asset/ISQU_left.gif?v=1&s=058342ecdcd1daf190da604b0a50d331af3415cf)
1468-2478/asset/ISQU_centre.gif?v=1&s=efb7ef8eb4b9efca19c2bf9bbffb37eccbd9ec2e)
1468-2478/asset/ISQU_right.gif?v=1&s=4be05b95f6de912b5ead6049e88827cb9307e7a2)
