Growing Sovereignty: Modeling the Shift from Indirect to Direct Rule

Authors


  • Authors’ notes: We acknowledge financial support from the ETH Competence Center “Coping with Crisis in Complex Socio-Economic Systems.” This project has profited from comments by the participants of the workshop “Political Networks II” that was held at Cambridge University, March 18–19, 2005; the conference on “Generative Social Processes, Models, and Mechanisms,” University of Chicago, October 13-15, 2005; and the CCSS Workshop, Zürich, June 8, 2009. We would also like to thank Alessandro Lomi for organizing the workshop “Forms, Functions, and Organization,” Bologna, September 9–10, 2004, which stimulated the early phase of this project.

Abstract

Drawing on theories of historical sociology, we model the emergence of the territorial state in early modern Europe. Our modeling effort focuses on systems change with respect to the shift from indirect to direct rule. We first introduce a one-dimensional model that captures the tradeoff between organizational and geographic distances. In a second step, we present an agent-based model that features states with a varying number of organizational levels. This model explicitly represents causal mechanisms of conquest and internal state-building through organizational bypass processes. The computational findings confirm our hypothesis that technological change is sufficient to trigger the emergence of modern, direct-state hierarchies. Our theoretical findings indicate that the historical transformation from indirect to direct rule presupposes a logistical, rather than the commonly assumed exponential, form of the loss-of-strength gradient.

Ancillary