The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism

Authors

  • B. Guy Peters,

    Corresponding author
    1. University of Pittsburgh
      B. Guy Peters (bgpeters@pitt.edu) is Maurice Falk Professor of political science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jon Pierre,

    Corresponding author
    1. University of Gothenburg
      Jon Pierre (Jon.Pierre@pol.gu.se) is professor of political science, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden SE 405 30.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Desmond S. King

    Corresponding author
    1. Oxford University
      Desmond S. King (desmond.king@nuffield.ox.ac.uk) is Andrew W. Mellon Professor of American Government, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom OX1 2RL.
    Search for more papers by this author

B. Guy Peters (bgpeters@pitt.edu) is Maurice Falk Professor of political science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.

Jon Pierre (Jon.Pierre@pol.gu.se) is professor of political science, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden SE 405 30.

Desmond S. King (desmond.king@nuffield.ox.ac.uk) is Andrew W. Mellon Professor of American Government, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom OX1 2RL.

Abstract

The conventional critique of institutional theory, and especially historical institutionalism, is that it is incapable of coping with change. We argue for the importance of political conflict as a means of initiating change in an institutionalist framework. In particular, conflict over ideas and the underlying assumptions of policy is important for motivating change. We demonstrate the viability of this argument with examples of institutional change.

Ancillary