Wie wirken die automatischen Stabilisatoren in der Wirtschaftskrise? Deutschland im Vergleich zu anderen EU-Staaten und den USA
Article first published online: 17 MAY 2010
© 2010 die Autoren Journal compilation © 2010, Verein für Socialpolitik und Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik
Volume 11, Issue 2, pages 132–145, May 2010
How to Cite
Dolls, M., Fuest, C. and Peichl, A. (2010), Wie wirken die automatischen Stabilisatoren in der Wirtschaftskrise? Deutschland im Vergleich zu anderen EU-Staaten und den USA. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 11: 132–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2516.2010.00331.x
- Issue published online: 17 MAY 2010
- Article first published online: 17 MAY 2010
Abstract: This paper analyzes the effectiveness of the tax and transfer systems in the European Union and the US to act as an automatic stabilizer in the current economic crisis. We consider two scenarios: a proportional income shock and a shock on employment which increases the rate of unemployment. We find that automatic stabilizers absorb 38 percent of a proportional income shock in the EU, compared to 32 percent in the US. In the case of an unemployment shock 48 percent of the shock is absorbed in the EU, compared to 34 percent in the US. Under the assumption that only credit constrained households adjust current spending on consumption goods to current disposable income, the cushioning of disposable income leads to a demand stabilization of 26 to 35 percent in the EU and 19 percent in the US. There is large heterogeneity within the EU. Automatic stabilizers in Eastern and Southern Europe are much lower than in Central and Northern European countries. With respect to income stabilization, Germany is above the European average for both scenarios. Demand stabilization in Germany is weaker because the number of liquidity constrained households is below the EU average.