Charles Pavitt is associate professor of communication at the University of Delaware. His main research interests are in communication in formal interpersonal settings, and the relevance of philosophy of science for communication theory. This essay is much the better for the input from this journal's editor and reviewers.
The Third Way: Scientific Realism and Communication Theory
Version of Record online: 17 MAR 2006
Volume 9, Issue 2, pages 162–188, May 1999
How to Cite
Pavitt, C. (1999), The Third Way: Scientific Realism and Communication Theory. Communication Theory, 9: 162–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00356.x
- Issue online: 17 MAR 2006
- Version of Record online: 17 MAR 2006
Several commentators have distinguished between two general philosophies of science, “logical empiricism” and “perspectivism,” and implied that communication theorists who use quantitative social scientific methods are, as a consequence, logical empiricists. This dichotomy ignores a third position, “scientific realism,” which is dominant in current philosophy of science. This essay distinguishes these three major philosophic movements and advances the argument that communication theorizing is realist when it presumes the reality and causal efficacy of critical theoretical concepts. An acceptance of the scientific realist approach implies a set of three commitments for the communication theorist: to the reality of one's theoretical concepts, to scientific explanation as causal process, and to the “reliability of meaning.” Relevant communication theorizing is discussed in light of these commitments.