SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Claude H. Miller, Bobi Ivanov, Jeanetta Sims, Josh Compton, Kylie J. Harrison, Kimberly A. Parker, James L. Parker, Joshua M. Averbeck, Boosting the Potency of Resistance: Combining the Motivational Forces of Inoculation and Psychological Reactance, Human Communication Research, 2013, 39, 1
  2. 2
    John A. Banas, Stephen A. Rains, A Meta-Analysis of Research on Inoculation Theory, Communication Monographs, 2010, 77, 3, 281

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    이상경, The Application of Inoculation Theory to the Promotion Strategy for Resistance to Corporate Crisis, Journal of Public Relations, 2008, 12, 1, 109

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Joshua A. Compton, Michael Pfau, Chapter 4: Inoculation Theory of Resistance to Influence at Maturity: Recent Progress In Theory Development and Application and Suggestions for Future Research, Communication Yearbook, 2005, 29, 1, 97

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Peter A. Andersen, Tammy R. Blackburn, An experimental study of language intensity and response rate in e mail surveys, Communication Reports, 2004, 17, 2, 73

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Hua-Hsin Wan, Michael Pfau, The Relative Effectiveness of Inoculation, Bolstering, and Combined Approaches in Crisis Communication, Journal of Public Relations Research, 2004, 16, 3, 301

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Paul J. Taylor, A Cylindrical Model of Communication Behavior in Crisis Negotiations, Human Communication Research, 2002, 28, 1
  8. 8
    Thomas E. DeCarlo, Alcohol warnings and warning labels: an examination of alternative alcohol warning messages and perceived effectiveness, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1997, 14, 6, 448

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Michael Pfau, The potential of inoculation in promoting resistance to the effectiveness of comparative advertising messages, Communication Quarterly, 1992, 40, 1, 26

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    William L. Benoit, Two tests of the mechanism of inoculation theory, Southern Communication Journal, 1991, 56, 3, 219

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    MICHAEL BURGOON, OVERCOMING RESISTANCE TO PERSUASION VIA CONTIGUOUS REINFORCEMENT AND REPETITION OF MESSAGE, Psychological Reports, 1990, 66, 3, 1011

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    MICHAEL BURGOON, MICHAEL D. MILLER, OVERCOMING RESISTANCE TO PERSUASION VIA CONTIGUOUS REINFORCEMENT AND REPETITION OF MESSAGE, Psychological Reports, 1990, 66, 3, 1011

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Sally Jackson, Daniel J. O'Keefe, Scott Jacobs, Dale E. Brashers, Messages as replications: Toward a message-centered design strategy, Communication Monographs, 1989, 56, 4, 364

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    MICHAEL PFAU, MICHAEL BURGOON, Inoculation in Political Campaign Communication, Human Communication Research, 1988, 15, 1
  15. 15
    Beverly K. Yahnke, The Effects of Functional Brain Asymmetry Upon Subliminal Perception, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 1988, 8, 2, 121

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    SALLY JACKSON, SCOTT JACOBS, GENERALIZING ABOUT MESSAGES: SUGGESTIONS FOR DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS, Human Communication Research, 1983, 9, 2
  17. 17
    Michael Burgoon, James P. Dillard, Noel E. Doran, Michael D. Miller, Cultural and situational influences on the process of persuasive strategy selection, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1982, 6, 1, 85

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Dale Hample, The cognitive context of argument, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1981, 45, 2, 148

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    N. L. Reinsch, Receivers' perceptions of brief written messages, Southern Speech Communication Journal, 1979, 45, 1, 27

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    MICHAEL D. MILLER, MICHAEL BURGOON, THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VIOLATIONS OF EXPECTATIONS AND THE INDUCTION OF RESISTANCE TO PERSUASION, Human Communication Research, 1979, 5, 4
  21. 21
    JAMES J. BRADAC, JOHN WAITE BOWERS, JOHN A. COURTRIGHT, THREE LANGUAGE VARIABLES IN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH: INTENSITY, IMMEDIACY, AND DIVERSITY, Human Communication Research, 1979, 5, 3
  22. 22
    MICHAEL BURGOON, MICHAEL D. MILLER, MARSHALL COHEN, CHARLES L. MONTGOMERY, AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF A MODEL OF RESISTANCE TO PERSUASION, Human Communication Research, 1978, 5, 1
  23. 23
    BERT PRYOR, THOMAS M. STEINFATT, THE EFFECTS OF INITIAL BELIEF LEVEL ON INOCULATION THEORY AND ITS PROPOSED MECHANISMS, Human Communication Research, 1978, 4, 3
  24. 24
    W. Clifton Adams, Michael J. Beatty, Dogmatism, need for social approval, and the resistance to persuasion, Communication Monographs, 1977, 44, 4, 321

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Michael D. Miller, Michael Burgoon, Predictors of Resistance to Persuasion: Propensity of Persuasive Attack, Pretreatment Language Intensity, and Expected Delay of Attack, The Journal of Psychology, 1977, 95, 1, 105

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    LAWRENCE J. CHASE, CLIFFORD W. KELLY, LANGUAGE INTENSITY AND RESISTANCE TO PERSUASION: A RESEARCH NOTE, Human Communication Research, 1976, 3, 1
  27. 27
    Michael Burgoon, Propensity of Persuasive Attack and Intensity of Pretreatment Messages as Predictors of Resistance to Persuasion, The Journal of Psychology, 1976, 92, 1, 123

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    JUDEE K. BURGOON, CONFLICTING INFORMATION, ATTITUDE, AND MESSAGE VARIABLES AS PREDICTORS OF LEARNING AND PERSUASION1, Human Communication Research, 1975, 1, 2
  29. 29
    MICHAEL BURGOON, STEPHEN B. JONES, DIANE STEWART, TOWARD A MESSAGE-CENTERED THEORY OF PERSUASION: THREE EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF LANGUAGE INTENSITY1, Human Communication Research, 1975, 1, 3
  30. 30
    N.L. REINSCH, FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE AND SOURCE CREDIBILITY: A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION AND RECONCEPTUALIZATION1, Human Communication Research, 1974, 1, 1