SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Hanneke Hendriks, Bas van den Putte, Gert-Jan de Bruijn, Subjective Reality: The Influence of Perceived and Objective Conversational Valence on Binge Drinking Determinants, Journal of Health Communication, 2015, 20, 7, 859

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Amanda J. Holmstrom, Jessica C. Russell, David D. Clare, Esteem Support Messages Received during the Job Search: A Test of the CETESM, Communication Monographs, 2013, 80, 2, 220

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Gabriel Giordano, Joey George, Kent Marett, Brian Keane, Reviewers and the Detection of Deceptive Information in Recorded Interviews, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2011, 41, 2
  4. 4
    Laura Campos, María L. Alonso-Quecuty, Language crimes and the cognitive interview: testing its efficacy in retrieving a conversational event, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2008, 22, 9
  5. 5
    Jennifer A. Samp, Laura R. Humphreys, “I Said What?” Partner Familiarity, Resistance, and the Accuracy of Conversational Recall, Communication Monographs, 2007, 74, 4, 561

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Nicholas A. Palomares, James J. Bradac, Kathy Kellermann, Chapter 2: Conversational Topic along a Continuum of Perspectives: Conceptual Issues, Communication Yearbook, 2006, 30, 1, 45

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Rodney A. Reynolds, Discouraging Messages, Communication Reports, 2006, 19, 1, 16

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Laura Campos, María Alonso-Quecuty, Remembering a criminal conversation: Beyond eyewitness testimony, Memory, 2006, 14, 1, 27

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Linda Albright, Alvin I Cohen, Thomas E Malloy, Theodore Christ, Gregg Bromgard, Judgments of communicative intent in conversation, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2004, 40, 3, 290

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Norah E. Dunbar, Artemio Ramirez, Judee K. Burgoon, The effects of participation on the ability to judge deceit, Communication Reports, 2003, 16, 1, 23

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Jennifer Monahan, Melanie Laliker, Intensifying the dominant response II: nonconscious negative affect, cognitive demand and conversations, Communication Monographs, 2002, 69, 4, 357

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    James M. Honeycutt, Sherry G . Ford, Chapter 9: Mental Imagery and Intrapersonal Communication: A Review of Research on Imagined Interactions (IIs) and Current Developments, Communication Yearbook, 2001, 25, 1, 315

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Larry Powell, Mark Hickson, Power imbalance and anticipation of conflict resolution: Positive and negative attributes of perceptual recall, Communication Research Reports, 2000, 17, 2, 181

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller, Carolyn E. Johnson, Kristin E.J. Roodenburg, The discrepancy between hearing impairment and handicap in the elderly: Balancing transaction and interaction in conversation, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 1998, 26, 1, 99

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Judi Beinstein Miller, Memory for Conversation, Memory, 1996, 4, 6, 615

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    William L. Benoit, Pamela J. Benoit, James Wilkie, Participants’ and observers’ memory for conversational behavior, Southern Communication Journal, 1996, 61, 2, 139

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Jennifer L. Monahan, Information processing differences of conversational participants and observers: The effects of self-presentation concerns and cognitive load, Communication Monographs, 1995, 62, 3, 265

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Mary M. Gill, Accent and stereotypes: Their effect on perceptions of teachers and lecture comprehension, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 1994, 22, 4, 348

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Pamela J. Benoit, William L. Benoit, Anticipated future interaction and conversational memory using participants and observers, Communication Quarterly, 1994, 42, 3, 274

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    L. TODD THOMAS, TIMOTHY R.LEVINE, Disentangling Listening and Verbal Recall Related But Separate Constructs?, Human Communication Research, 1994, 21, 1
  21. 21
    VINCENT R. WALDRON, JAMES L. APPLEGATE, Interpersonal Construct Differentiation and Conversational Planning An Examination of Two Cognitive Accounts for the Production of Competent Verbal Disagreement Tactics, Human Communication Research, 1994, 21, 1
  22. 22
    Judee K. Burgoon, David B. Buller, Laura K. Guerrero, Clyde M. Feldman, Interpersonal deception: VI. Effects of preinteractional and interactional factors on deceiver and observer perceptions of deception success, Communication Studies, 1994, 45, 3-4, 263

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Valerie Manusov, “It depends on your perspective”: Effects of stance and beliefs about intent on person perception, Western Journal of Communication, 1993, 57, 1, 27

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Judee K. Burgoon, Leesa Dillman, Lesa A. Stem, Adaptation in Dyadic Interaction: Defining and Operationalizing Patterns of Reciprocity and Compensation, Communication Theory, 1993, 3, 4
  25. 25
    Steven R. Wilson, Michael G. Cruz, Kil Ho Kang, Is it always a matter of perspective? Construct differentiation and variability in attributions about compliance gaining, Communication Monographs, 1992, 59, 4, 350

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Mary M. Gill, Diane M. Badzinski, The impact of accent and status on information recall and perception formation, Communication Reports, 1992, 5, 2, 99

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    KATHY KELLERMANN, The Negativity Effect in Interaction It's All in Your Point of View, Human Communication Research, 1989, 16, 2