Conflict of Interest The authors state no conflict of interest.
Dynamic skin changes of acute radiation dermatitis revealed by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy
Article first published online: 11 AUG 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology © 2012 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Volume 27, Issue 9, pages 1143–1150, September 2013
How to Cite
Vano-Galvan, S., Fernandez-Lizarbe, E., Truchuelo, M., Diaz-Ley, B., Grillo, E., Sanchez, V., Ríos-Buceta, L., Paoli, J., Sancho, S., Montero, A., Hernanz, R., Ramos, A., Jaen, P. and Gonzalez, S. (2013), Dynamic skin changes of acute radiation dermatitis revealed by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 27: 1143–1150. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04680.x
Funding sources None.
- Issue published online: 28 JUL 2013
- Article first published online: 11 AUG 2012
- Received: 4 May 2012; Accepted: 20 July 2012.
Background A better knowledge of the dynamic biological changes that the skin undergoes in response to ionizing radiation is advisable to improve the management of radiation dermatitis, allowing selection of patients needing treatment or close monitoring.
Objective To describe the evolution of the skin in response to ionizing radiation through the reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) features of acute radiation dermatitis.
Methods In this prospective descriptive study, six women (median age, 55 years; range, 45–80 years) diagnosed with breast cancer in stages IA-IB undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy were included in the study through consecutive sampling. Clinical, dermoscopic and RCM evaluation of the skin were performed prior to treatment and on days 1, 15, 30 and 45 after radiotherapy.
Results While clinical features of radiation dermatitis emerged after 30 days on average, histopathological changes were detectable by RCM after a mean time of 15 days. The main RCM features included initial appearance of spongiosis, exocytosis and inflammatory cells followed by the presence of dendritic-shaped cells, ‘streaming-like figures’, ‘broken geographic papillae’, epidermal architectural disarray, effacement of rete ridges, melanophages and, finally, hyperpigmentation of the basal layer.
Conclusions RCM may safely detect the dynamic biological changes that the skin undergoes in response to ionizing radiation, even before than clinical onset of acute radiation dermatitis. Therefore, RCM may be useful to make an early and non-invasive diagnosis of radiation dermatitis during radiotherapy, allowing an early selection of patients needing treatment or close monitoring and avoiding skin biopsies.