SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • dog;
  • human;
  • attachment;
  • gaze;
  • oxytocin

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. The human-dog relationship
  4. The concept of attachment from the biological perspective
  5. Summary
  6. References

The special relationship that dogs have developed with humans has been studied not only from the social sciences perspective, but also from the perspectives of psychology and human medicine. Recently, in cognitive science, it has been suggested that dogs may have acquired the superior cognitive ability to communicate with humans, particularly using human-like visual cues during evolution, and that emotional bonding has developed between humans and dogs by means of similar social cues. This article discusses the biological aspects of human-dog attachment. Attachment requires the distinction of a specific figure using species-specific social cues and specific responses to the figure, brought about by neuroendocrinological homeostatic functions as well as behavioral aspects. It has been shown that dogs can distinguish a particular human figure (e.g. the owner) and exhibit specific autonomic reactions. Moreover, when dogs gaze at their owners, the latter's urinary oxytocin levels increase after the interaction. This understanding of the biological aspect of interspecies attachment suggests the possible elements that form the basis of cross-species empathy and the development of evolutionary cognitive abilities that may depend on not merely their genetic dendrogram.

During the domestication process, animals have come to develop a profound relationship with humans. Since prehistoric times, humans have succeeded in domesticating only approximately 20 different animal species. Archaeological evidence suggests that dogs were the first species to be domesticated (Clutton-Brock, 1995). Compared with other domesticated animals, dogs have developed a special relationship with humans, and can be considered as the only species to have established a niche for themselves in human society.

The earliest find of a mandible of a domestic dog from a late Paleolithic grave at Oberkassel, Germany, is believed to be approximately 14 000 years old (Nobis, 1979). By that time, humans may have not only shared their living area with dogs, but also have developed an emotional bond with them, as evidenced by the famous grave of a human and a puppy at the Natufian site of Ein Mallaha, Israel (Davis & Valla, 1978). While the domestication of other animals was carried out for definite purposes, mainly food and clothing supply and transportation (Beaver, 2009), for example, the purpose of and the process involved in the domestication of dogs are not yet clear. The general idea so far is that domestic dogs evolved from wolves. Analyses of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and nuclear DNA have revealed that dogs belong to the same species as wolves (Okumura, Ishiguro, Nakano, Matsui, & Sahara, 1996; Vila, Savolainen, Maldonado, Amorim, Rice, Honeycutt, Crandall, Lundeberg, & Wayne, 1997). MtDNA, unlike nuclear DNA, is maternally inherited. It is used to analyze intra- and interspecies molecular evolution because the speed of the molecular evolution of mtDNA is greater than that of nuclear DNA, and the base substitution accumulation is suitable for analysis. Savolainen, Zhang, Luo, Lundeberg, and Leitner (2002) found a larger genetic variation in East Asia than in other regions, and the pattern of phylogeographic variation suggests an East Asian origin for the domestic dog. These data correspond to other data from a large number of autosomal polymorphic markers (microsatellites) studied by Parker, Kim, Sutter, Carlson, Lorentzen, Malek, Johnson, DeFrance, Ostrander, and Kruglyak (2004), which indicate that East Asian dog breeds are genetically the closest to wolves. Meanwhile, comparative cognitive science shows certain specific social cognitive abilities of dogs, making them interesting subjects for study.

The human-dog relationship

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. The human-dog relationship
  4. The concept of attachment from the biological perspective
  5. Summary
  6. References

Bonding between humans and dogs

Ever since the domestication of dogs was achieved, humans have developed a cooperative relationship with them; for example, dogs were bred for purposes such as hunting, guarding, and herding (Coppinger & Schneider, 1995). In recent times, dogs have become more closely involved with human activities, working as service dogs, drug-sniffing dogs, alert dogs, etc., and have consequently developed a close relationship with humans. The importance of human-dog bonding has attracted increased attention owing to its psychological aspects. The human-dog relationship began to be investigated after Levinson (1962) reported a case in which a child who had communication problems clinically benefited from a dog's company.

The reason why dogs have mental and physical effects on humans remains unclear, yet there are some hypotheses (Kruger & Serpell, 2006). One suggests that humans develop positive feelings and behavior while caring for dogs because a bond similar to that in human mother-infant relationships can be formed between humans and dogs (Serpell, 2003). Attachment or social bonding can have a positive influence on the psychological and physiological aspects of human beings. To measure this human-dog “attachment relationship,” some psychological parameters for the degree of attachment that humans have toward companion animals have been developed (Holcomb, Williams, & Richards, 1985; Johnson, Garrity, & Stallones, 1992; Munsell, Canfield, Templer, Tangan, & Arikawa, 2004; Poresky, Hendrix, Mosier, & Samuelson, 1987). As a result, it is said that not only owning dogs, but also the degree of attachment that humans have toward dogs, is linked to human health, wellbeing, and the development of positive feelings (Garrity, Stallones, Marx, & Johnson, 1989; Ory & Goldberg, 1983). However, most of the studies have only evaluated the feelings of humans using psychological scales or questionnaires; therefore, the concept of human-dog attachment or bonding is still not clearly defined. In other words, these studies have failed to decipher the human-dog relationship from the biological perspective.

The definition of attachment by Bowlby

In order to explain the mechanism of how the parent-infant relationship influences the development of the infant, Bowlby (1969) developed attachment theory from ethology, not from traditional psychology. At the time, ethology had confirmed the innate releasing and imprinting mechanisms (Lorenz & Leyhausen, 1973). It was assumed that these innate mechanisms, which involved specific adaptive behaviors, were elicited by specific social stimuli and played an important role in the subsequent onset and maintenance of adaptive behaviors. Bowlby assumed that humans innately possess similar mechanisms. He defined attachment as a safety regulation system on the basis of the behavioral control system. The activities of the system tend to reduce the risk of harm to the individual, for example, predation and anxiety, and to increase the sense of security. As a consequence, a bond is formed between parents and infants.

Bowlby (1969) highlighted two characteristics of attachment behavior observed in birds and mammals. The first is maintaining proximity to another animal and restoring it if impaired, and the second is the specificity of the other animal. Parents and the young usually exhibit special behavior toward each other that they would not exhibit toward other animals. Parent-young relationships are characterized by individual recognition and highly differentiated behavior. Bowlby focused on the development of the distinction of a particular individual, which becomes the basis of attachment in human infant-parent relationships as well.

The concept of attachment tends to be broadly interpreted and often confused with reminiscences of positive feelings such as love and warmth (MacDonald, 1992). As mentioned above, attachment is used in vague terms in discussions of the human-dog relationship. We need to review the significance of attachment from a biological perspective in order to understand the human-dog relationship. Therefore, in this review, we discuss the ability to distinguish specific objects and the neuroendocrinological significance of attachment.

The concept of attachment from the biological perspective

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. The human-dog relationship
  4. The concept of attachment from the biological perspective
  5. Summary
  6. References

Visual cognitive ability of dog for social stimuli

Dogs have undoubtedly established a niche for themselves in human society, as companion animals that are closest to and the most loved by humans. Recently, it was found that the visual cognitive ability of dogs is superior to that of wolves and apes, in terms of understanding human pointing gestures (Hare, Brown, Williamson, & Tomasello, 2002; Miklósi, Kubinyi, Topál, Gácsi, Virányi, & Csányi, 2003). Dogs' visual cognitive ability is considered to have developed during their domestication (Hare & Tomasello, 2005). Examinations were conducted on different species' understanding of human pointing gestures (domestic animals like goats, horses, and cats included), and some of these yielded positive results depending on the experimental methods used (Kaminski, Riedel, Call, & Tomasello, 2005; McKinley & Sambrook, 2000; Miklósi, Pongracz, Lakatos, Topál, & Csányi, 2005; Miklósi & Soproni, 2006; Udell, Dorey, & Wynne, 2008; Viranyi, Gácsi, Kubinyi, Topál, Belényi, Ujfalussy, & Miklósi, 2008). Perhaps the animal that is organizing a society should maintain the ability for directional detection among conspecifics at some level. It is difficult to discuss the significance of the social cognitive ability of each species simply on the basis of these examination results. However, it was found that when dogs faced difficulties, they immediately looked to their owners for help, whereas wolves attempted to solve problems on their own (Miklósi et al., 2003). Cats, who have also carved a niche for themselves in human society, were found to have similar pointing gesture understanding abilities; however, they did not display certain attention-seeking behaviors that dogs did (e.g. alternating gaze between the direction of the hidden food and the human: Miklósi et al., 2005). Given the more stable results of the examinations on dogs, these studies suggest the distinctiveness of their social cognitive ability with respect to humans.

In investigating the human-dog relationship, the possibility that dogs possess a human-like visual cognitive ability is very important. Each animal has species-specific cues for social bonding. Sharing social cues and distinguishing a particular individual are indispensable to the survival of animals, bringing them physiological and ethological benefits, such as social buffering (see below). In humans, one of the most important cues is the visual cue (e.g. in the human mother-infant relationship (Dickstein, Thompson, Estes, Malkin, & Lamb, 1984). Humans gaze into other human's eyes with particular interest and respond to the direction of other's gaze (Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, & Jolliffe, 1997; Driver, Davis, Ricciardelli, Kidd, Maxwell, & Baron-Cohen, 1999; Macrae, Hood, Milne, Rowe, & Mason, 2002; Morton & Johnson, 1991). Moreover, human infants are more comfortable maintaining eye contact with adults (Batki, Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Connellan, & Ahluwalia, 2000; Farroni, Csibra, Simion, & Johnson, 2002). With respect to dogs, some studies have shown that dogs can understand where human attention is directed (Call, Bräuer, Kaminski, & Tomasello, 2003; Miklósi, Polgárdi, Topál, & Csányi, 2000). Other studies have demonstrated that dogs tended to accept food from people whose faces were visible rather than people who were blindfolded or whose heads were covered with a bag (Gácsi, Miklósi, Varga, Topál, & Csányi, 2004; Virányi, Topál, Gácsi, Miklósi, & Csányi, 2004). Virányi, Topál, Miklósi, and Csányi (2006) suggested the possibility that dogs think that humans do not know what they cannot see. These studies indicate the psychological and behavioral harmony between dogs and human beings. The fact that dogs use gaze to communicate proves their high social cognitive ability, and is very important in investigating the specific relationship between human and dogs.

Autonomic responses to specific stimuli in dogs

The capacity for individual discrimination is essential in the development of long-lasting bonds between mating partners and biological relatives such as mothers and infants, and for maintaining individual life and species life. Intraspecies individual discrimination employs species-specific sensory organs. It is widely known that ewes reject other lambs without bonding with them on the basis of their odor (Keverne & Kendrick, 1992). Primates can discriminate between conspecific individuals using visual cues (Dasser, 1987).

Adachi, Kuwahata, and Fujita (2007) also showed the ability of dogs to discriminate between human beings. They tested whether dogs form a crossmodal representation of human beings. Dogs were shown a monitor with a picture of either their owner or a stranger after playing back a voice recording of one of those persons. They tended to look longer at the visual stimulus when the voice and face did not match than when they did; this suggests that dogs form a multimodal concept of their owners using visual and auditory cues.

These results indicate that dogs can discriminate between their owners and unfamiliar persons. Could it be that dogs are able to not only discern humans individually, but also distinguish a specific person from others as the attachment object? Topál, Miklósi, Csányi, and Dóka (1998) investigated the ability of dogs to discriminate between individuals using the Strange Situation Test (SST; Ainsworth & Wittig, 1969). The SST was originally developed to examine the balance between attachment and exploratory behaviors on the basis of the different reactions of infants, for example, reactions to their mothers compared with unfamiliar persons in a moderately stressful environment. The results showed that, like human infants, dogs behave differently with their owners and with strangers. Topál, Gácsi, Miklósi, Virányi, Kubinyi, and Csányi (2005) also carried out the SST on hand-reared wolves, and found that the wolves did not behave differently with strangers than they did with their owners. Using physiological approaches, we tried to examine whether dogs can discriminate between a particular object, that is, the owner, and others, and to verify whether they can exhibit specific responses. Even though it has been proven that dogs can discriminate between human beings, there is no significant evidence indicating the biological functions of the discrimination. The results of this study provide significant insight into the attachment shown by dogs toward humans from the biological perspective. We investigated whether dogs show specific emotional reactions to their owners, by assaying the heart rate variability (HRV) as an autonomic parameter (Nagasawa, Mitsui, Mogi, & Kikusui, unpublished data, 2008).

The heart rate (HR) is controlled by the sympathetic and parasympathetic autonomic nervous systems. Under resting conditions, the ECG of healthy individuals exhibits periodic variation in beat-to-beat intervals. The HRV refers to the beat-to-beat alterations in the HR. A common frequency domain method is the application of the discrete Fourier transformation to the beat-to-beat interval time series. This provides an estimation of the amount of variation at specific frequencies. A low-frequency band (LF) between 0.04 and 0.15 Hz derives from both parasympathetic and sympathetic activities, while a high-frequency band (HF) between 0.15 and 0.40 Hz is driven by respiration, and appears to derive mainly from the parasympathetic nervous system. The general ratio of LF to HF is considered to be the activity of the sympathetic nervous system (Bootsma, Swenne, Van Bolhuis, Chang, Cats, & Bruschke, 1994; Furlan, Barbic, Piazza, Tinelli, Seghizzi, & Malliani, 2000; Montano, Ruscone, Porta, Lombardi, Pagani, & Malliani, 1994), and HF to reflect the activity of the parasympathetic nervous system (Hayano, Sakakibara, Yamada, Mukai, Fujinami, Yokoyama, Watanabe, & Takata, 1991; Pomeranz, Macaulay, Caudill, Kutz, Adam, Gordon, Kilborn, Barger, Shannon, & Cohen, 1985). Maros, Dóka, and Miklósi (2008) tested the HR and HRV responses in dogs during different physical activities and arousal situations, and found that the HR, but not the HRV, increased during periods of increased physical activity and body position. In contrast, the HRV significantly increased when dogs oriented toward their favorite toy. This study indicated that the body position significantly affected the HR in dogs, and that the HRV may be indicative of their attentive state.

In order to examine the discriminatory ability of dogs, we conducted the habituation-dishabituation test (Halpin, 1974) on dogs, using their owners as the test stimulus and unfamiliar persons as the neutral stimulus. Seven adult dogs and their owners (OW) participated in the study. During the experiments, a dog was kept in an opaque enclosure with a metal grid opening so that the stimuli were visible. Three unfamiliar persons, who had never interacted with the dog before, were shown to each dog as strangers (ST). These unfamiliar persons were the same sex as and of similar appearance to the dogs' owners.

The dogs were introduced into the testing area one at a time, and presented with four stimuli: the first three were denoted as ST1, ST2, and ST3, and the last as OW. After a 5-min resting period, the first stimulus (ST1) was presented for 4 min, followed by a 3-min interval. Then, ST2, ST3, and OW were presented in the same manner. We compared the HR and LF/HF values and the duration of the exhibited behavior between the presentation of ST1 and ST3, and ST3 and OW. The results showed that during the habituation phase (ST1–ST3), the HR and HRV (LF/HF) decreased significantly (ST1 vs. ST3). In the test trial for OW, the HR and HRV significantly increased compared with those for ST3 (Figure 1). These results indicated that presenting the owners as stimuli activated the autonomic system in dogs more than when strangers were presented; this suggests that dogs can not only discriminate between owners and strangers, but also exhibit emotional responses when reunited with their owners. Therefore, dogs have the ability to discriminate between and respond differently to different humans, and this ability fulfills some of the criteria for the formation of a social bond between humans and dogs.

image

Figure 1. (a) Heart rate variability (HRV) and (b) heart rate (HR) of dogs in the habituation-dishabituation test of attachment between humans and dogs. The dog's owner was assigned as the test stimulus (OW) and unfamiliar subjects were the neutral stimuli (ST1, 2, 3). Both HRV and HR gradually decreased during the habituation phase (ST1, 2, 3), and increased significantly in the test phase (OW). *P < 0.05.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Neuroendocrine mechanisms for attachment

Attachment, which has significant biological implications in each species, may possibly activate the internal mechanism as a vital reaction and homeostatic function (Hofer, 1995; Kraemer, 1992). Furthermore, the attachment system involves the interactions initiated by the infant's attachment behavior, followed by the mother's care-giving behavior and subsequent interactions. Social signals (social cues) from members in the dyad, and the subsequent endocrinological changes, can activate the attachment system, which not only increases the survival probability of infants, but also contributes to the enhancement of their parents' biological fitness. However, because the biological social attachment of both human and dogs has not been manifested yet, we have to apply the results from studies in other species.

In animal experiments, the meanings of attachment and bond based on attachment are more critical and clearly described. When a social bond is broken, animals exhibit separation anxiety and the stress-endocrine response is activated. In contrast, in polygamous mating pairs, for example, separation does not elicit the stress-endocrine response. This kind of relationship (called social affiliation) has to be distinguished from attachment and bond (DeVries, 2002). It is suggested that attachment is not only related to the behavioral control system for avoiding the danger of predation, but is also closely related to the feedback system of the neuroendocrinological system.

Social buffering.

It is necessary to form and maintain a social bond with a particular object in order to maintain a stable social life, both mentally and physically (Kikusui, Winslow, & Mori, 2006). Social bonding refers to various relationships, such as between a mother and infant, mating pairs, and conspecific companions. Attachment between bonding partners has stress-buffering effects and is critical for the survival of many social species. As mentioned earlier, attachment, as defined by Bowlby on the basis of the behavioral control system, is the safety regulation system. The social buffering effects observed in dyadic relationships comply with Bowlby's definition. Studies investigating the social buffering effects of the stress-endocrine response have focused on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. The first evidence of social buffering in nonhuman primates was demonstrated in mother-infant bonding in squirrel monkeys (Coe, Mendoza, Smotherman, & Levine, 1978; Mendoza, Coe, Lowe, & Levine, 1978; Wiener, Johnson, & Levine, 1987), and details of these findings were later reviewed by Levine and colleagues (Levine, 2000, 2001; Levine, Lyons, & Schatzberg, 1997). In the mother-infant separation paradigm, the cortisol response was observed in infants, but was completely attenuated when the infants were reunited with their mothers, in parallel with the decrease of distress-like behavior. Being in a dyadic relationship has social-buffering effects, not only in the case of social separation stress, but also when faced with natural threats. For example, it has been found that systematic aversive stimulation increased cortisol levels in squirrel monkeys and that the presence of a familiar partner decreased the neuroendocrine response to the stimuli, as demonstrated by the classical fear-conditioning paradigm (Stanton, Patterson, & Levine, 1985). In this paradigm, the monkeys were first conditioned to the cue stimuli (lighting) and aversive stimuli (shock). Thereafter, the monkeys were exposed to the cues, and an increase in the cortisol levels was observed. However, if a monkey was with a familiar partner, there was a lesser increase in the cortisol levels and fear responses. These data indicate that the presence of social partners ameliorates the neuroendocrine response to various types of stressors.

Oxytocin.

The neuropeptide oxytocin is the key mediator for bonding between infant-mother dyads and mating pairs (Carter, Williams, Witt, & Insel, 1992). Moreover, an increase in oxytocin levels can have social buffering effects in the dyad (Kikusui et al., 2006). For example, the oxytocinergic system in ewes regulates the formation of memories for specific maternal behavior toward their own lamb (Keverne & Kendrick, 1992). Similarly, in rats, vaginocervical stimulation during parturition can activate oxytocin release and facilitate the onset of maternal behavior (Pedersen, Ascher, Monroe, & Prange, 1982). Oxytocin is also involved in infants' memory formation of the caregiver (Insel & Young, 2001; Nelson & Panksepp, 1996; Wilson & Sullivan, 1994), and in the process of pair-bond formation after the mating of monogamous species such as prairie voles (Young & Wang, 2004; Young, Wang, & Insel, 1998). In contrast, these behaviors are inhibited by oxytocin antagonists administered to prairie voles just before mating. In sum, oxytocin is the most important neurotransmitter that is responsible for social bonding.

Oxytocin has been suggested as a candidate molecule for the transmission of social-buffering effects. During physiological and psychological stress responses, oxytocinergic neurons are activated, particularly in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, and secreted into the blood (Ludwig, 1998; Neumann, 2002). Increases in oxytocin release from the hypothalamus inhibit stress neuroendocrine activity (DeVries, Glasper, & Detillion, 2003; Neumann, 2002; Neumann, Kromer, Toschi, & Ebner, 2000). Oxytocin also causes behavioral modifications to the stress response. In experimental rodents, it has been demonstrated that oxytocin has anxiolytic properties and plays a significant role in the stress-coping style (Ebner, Bosch, Kromer, Singewald, & Neumann, 2005; Haller, Makara, Barna, Kovacs, Nagy, & Vecsernyes, 1996; Neumann, 2002). It also induces excessive grooming behavior when injected into the brain (Pedersen, Caldwell, Drago, Noonan, Peterson, Hood, & Prange, 1988). Moreover, it has been suggested that central oxytocin is released in response to physical contact (Uvnas-Moberg, 1997).

A study on humans showed that breastfeeding after physical exercise attenuated the release of cortisol as well as adrenocorticotrophic hormones (ACTH) into the bloodstream (Altemus, Deuster, Galliven, Carter, & Gold, 1995). Recent studies have shown that the intranasal administration of oxytocin, which passes directly into the brain (Born, Lange, Kern, McGregor, Bickel, & Fehm, 2002), suppressed cortisol response to psychological stress as well as attenuated emotional functions after stress episodes (Heinrichs, Baumgartner, Kirschbaum, & Ehlert, 2003). Therefore, in humans, the inhibitory effect of oxytocin on HPA activity is also mediated in the central nervous system. In sum, these results indicate that oxytocin attenuates not only the HPA axis response to stress, but also reduces negative emotions. Although there is no direct evidence that oxytocin mediates social bonding in humans, some studies have suggested oxytocin related infant-mother bonding and social relationships (Fries, Ziegler, Kurian, Jacoris, & Pollak, 2005; Heinrichs et al., 2003; Kosfeld, Heinrichs, Zak, Fischbacher, & Fehr, 2005) Thus, oxytocin plays an essential role in the neural mechanisms of social bonding and stress buffering.

Oxytocin in human-dog bonding

The visual cognitive ability, particularly gazing, is the most fundamental and important social cue in humans. Visual communication abilities are considered to have developed in dogs as a by-product of their domestication, and as a behavior required for a symbiotic relationship with humans (Hare & Tomasello, 2005). It is possible that dogs, like humans, use gazing as a social cue. Focusing on the gaze of dogs, we constructed a hypothesis that the concentration of oxytocin in the urine of dog owners is affected by their dog's gaze, which functions as an attachment behavior. To test this hypothesis, the urinary oxytocin concentration of dog owners was measured before and after 30-min interactions with their dogs (Nagasawa, Kikusui, Onaka, & Ohta, 2009).

The participants in this study were 55 volunteers and their dogs. Prior to the experiment, the participants' degree of relationship with their dogs was measured on the basis of two questions: “How much are you satisfied with your dog?” and “How much do you feel you can communicate with your dog?” The answers to these questions were rated on a 5-point scale.

Two types of experiments, interaction experiment and control experiment, were carried out per participant on different days. The interaction experiment consisted of three settings: a 20-min rest period, a 30-min testing period involving normal interaction with the dogs, and a 20-min rest period after a 30-min testing period. During the testing period, the participants were allowed to freely interact with their dogs. Before and after the testing period, urine samples were collected from the participants. In the control experiment, the participants were forbidden to look at their dogs directly. They were made to sit facing a wall, which inhibited the gaze stimuli from the dog to the owner.

Using a cluster analysis, the owners were divided into two groups: one group received a longer gaze duration from their dogs and reported a higher degree of relationship with their dogs (LG), while the other group received a shorter gaze duration and reported a lower degree of relationship (SG). The urinary oxytocin levels were higher in the LG group than in the SG group after a normal interaction with their dogs (interaction experiment); however, this was not the case in the control experiment. In the interaction experiment, a high correlation was found in the LG group between the frequency of behavioral exchanges initiated by the dogs' gaze and the increase in urinary oxytocin levels, suggesting that the dogs' gaze stimulated the owner's oxytocinergic system.

These results indicated the strong possibility that oxytocin plays an important role in human-dog bonding. It is still unclear whether a dog's gaze at its owner is innate or learned, and whether the dog's gaze has different functional meanings for humans and conspecifics. However, the human response to attachment-related signals from other species can possibly be explained by human nature. Humans tend to anthropomorphize other animals and objects (Albert & Bulcroft, 1987; Salmon & Salmon, 1983). Human infants react to the motion of a robot by exhibiting communicative gaze behavior (Itakura, Ishida, Kanda, Shimada, Ishiguro, & Lee, 2008). One can assume that such behavior is very similar to that observed in human infants; hence, an owner who is gazed upon by his or her dog speculates about the dog's emotional status and regards the gaze as attachment behavior. Therefore, a dog's gaze is considered to be a significant cue for social contact in humans.

The results of this study suggest that, of all the interactions observed between dogs and their owners, a dog's gaze, as a factor that contributes to social bonding, has a particularly strong effect on its owner's neuroendocrine system. In humans, only indirect findings of the relation between oxytocin secretion and attachment have been reported (Fries et al., 2005). It is not yet clear whether oxytocin concentrations in the urine reflect the activity of the central nervous system; however, it has been shown that there is a strong positive relationship between the oxytocin concentration in the urine and that in plasma (r = .89: Amico, Ulbrecht, & Robinson, 1987), and that plasma oxytocin is related to hypothalamus activity (Ludwig, Callahan, Neumann, Landgraf, & Morris, 1994). Based on these data, it is likely that urinary oxytocin, at least to some extent, reflects the hypothalamic oxytocinergic activity.

This study provides a clue to the neural mechanisms through which interacting with dogs affects human physical and mental health. It is said that animals have species-specific attachment styles. This study suggests that humans and dogs may have a common attachment style, and this may partially explain why dogs can adapt to human society.

Summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. The human-dog relationship
  4. The concept of attachment from the biological perspective
  5. Summary
  6. References

Bowlby (1969) stated that ethology, experimental psychology, and neurophysiology contributed to the formulation of a well-based theory of instinct, which has been sought since the time of Freud, and he hoped for the amalgamation of these three disciplines. At present, various disciplines are promoting factual studies on the concept of attachment, and the world of animals as well as human infants is being explored.

However, dogs were rarely evaluated as subjects in cognitive science until approximately 15 years ago, because they were originally thought to be genetically modified by humans, and considered as belonging to humans as livestock. Therefore, the behavior and emotions of dogs are less obvious and generally equated with those of wolves. Only recently was it clarified that dogs can behave in response to human beings and have evolved social cognitive abilities in close symbiosis with humans.

This article discusses human-dog attachment. Attachment requires the distinction of a specific figure using species-specific social cues and specific responses to the figure, brought about not only by behavioral but also neuroendocrinological homeostatic functions. Hare and Tomasello (2005) suggested the possibility that specialized social problem-solving skills in dogs first developed after the systems that mediate fear and aggression evolved. After this initial evolution of fear and aggression, which motivated dogs to apply their inherited cognitive abilities to understand both conspecific and nonconspecific behavior involving humans, the variance in these cognitive abilities might have been the basis for second direct selection. That is to say, the abilities of each species have been acquired in order to adapt themselves to their environment and maintain their life. In the special relationship shared by humans and dogs, it is necessary to reveal the significance of biological systems, by considering the neuroendocrinological changes. Therefore, we attempted to evaluate the biological aspect of the human-dog relationship using physiological and neuroendocrinological approaches. The results indicated that dogs have the ability to discriminate autonomically between a particular human figure and other people, and that when dogs gaze at their owners, the latter's urinary oxytocin levels increase (Nagasawa et al., 2009). In other words, when human-like social cues are displayed by other species, human biological responses can be activated. Moreover, perhaps dogs are the only animals capable of using human-like social cues such as the gaze. This suggests the possible elements that form the basis of cross-species empathy and that the development of evolutionary cognitive abilities in a species may depend on not only their genetic dendrogram, but also interspecies-specific symbiotic relations.

The finding that dogs and humans can form a close relationship uncovers many areas for future research. Future research on interspecies attachment and bonding would involve investigations of the neuroendocrinological attachment mechanism in dogs and human-dog bonding as a manifestation of the specificity of dogs. The biological aspect of interspecies attachment must be explored by evaluating biological responses with interspecies social cognitive abilities.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. The human-dog relationship
  4. The concept of attachment from the biological perspective
  5. Summary
  6. References
  • Adachi, I., Kuwahata, H., & Fujita, K. (2007). Dogs recall their owner's face upon hearing the owner's voice. Animal Cognition, 10, 1721.
  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Wittig, B. A. (1969). Attachment and exploratory behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Determinants of Infant Behavior, 4, 113136.
  • Albert, A., & Bulcroft, K. (1987). Pets and urban life. Anthrozoös, 1, 925.
  • Altemus, M., Deuster, P. A., Galliven, E., Carter, C. S., & Gold, P. W. (1995). Suppression of hypothalmic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses to stress in lactating women. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 80, 29542959.
  • Amico, J. A., Ulbrecht, J. S., & Robinson, A. G. (1987). Clearance studies of oxytocin in humans using radioimmunoassay measurements of the hormone in plasma and urine. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 64, 340345.
  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Jolliffe, T. (1997). Is there a "language of the eyes"? Evidence from normal adults, and adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Visual Cognition, 4, 311331.
  • Batki, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Connellan, J., & Ahluwalia, J. (2000). Is there an innate gaze module? Evidence from human neonates. Infant Behavior and Development, 23, 223229.
  • Beaver, B. V. G. (2009). Canine behavior: Insights and answers, 2nd edn. St Louis, MO: Saunders.
  • Bootsma, M., Swenne, C., Van Bolhuis, H., Chang, P., Cats, V., & Bruschke, A. (1994). Heart rate and heart rate variability as indexes of sympathovagal balance. American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 266, 15651571.
  • Born, J., Lange, T., Kern, W., McGregor, G. P., Bickel, U., & Fehm, H. L. (2002). Sniffing neuropeptides: A transnasal approach to the human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 514516.
  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. Vol. I. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
  • Call, J., Bräuer, J., Kaminski, J., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 257263.
  • Carter, C. S., Williams, J. R., Witt, D. M., & Insel, T. R. (1992). Oxytocin and social bonding. New York Academy of Sciences, 652, 204211.
  • Clutton-Brock, J. (1995). Origins of the dog: Domestication and early history. In J. A.Serpell (Ed.), The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour, and interactions with people, 11th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 720.
  • Coe, C. L., Mendoza, S. P., Smotherman, W. P., & Levine, S. (1978). Mother-infant attachment in the squirrel monkey: Adrenal response to separation. Behavioral Biology, 22, 256263.
  • Coppinger, R., & Schneider, R. (1995). Evolution of working dogs. In J. A.Serpell (Ed.), The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour, and interactions with people, 11th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2147.
  • Dasser, V. (1987). Slides of group members as representations of the real animals (Macaca fascicularis). Ethology, 76, 6573.
  • Davis, S. J. M., & Valla, F. R. (1978). Evidence for domestication of the dog 12,000 years ago in the Natufian of Israel. Nature, 276, 608610.
  • DeVries, A. C. (2002). Interaction among social environment, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and behavior. Hormones and Behavior, 1, 405413.
  • DeVries, A. C., Glasper, E. R., & Detillion, C. E. (2003). Social modulation of stress responses. Physiology and Behavior, 79, 399407.
  • Dickstein, S., Thompson, R. A., Estes, D., Malkin, C., & Lamb, M. E. (1984). Social referencing and the security of attachment. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 507516.
  • Driver, J., Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 6, 509540.
  • Ebner, K., Bosch, O. J., Kromer, S. A., Singewald, N., & Neumann, I. D. (2005). Release of oxytocin in the rat central amygdala modulates stress-coping behavior and the release of excitatory amino acids. Neuropsychopharmacology, 30, 223230.
  • Farroni, T., Csibra, G., Simion, F., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 96029605.
  • Fries, A. B. W., Ziegler, T. E., Kurian, J. R., Jacoris, S., & Pollak, S. D. (2005). Early experience in humans is associated with changes in neuropeptides critical for regulating social behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 1723717240.
  • Furlan, R., Barbic, F., Piazza, S., Tinelli, M., Seghizzi, P., & Malliani, A. (2000). Modifications of cardiac autonomic profile associated with a shift schedule of work. Circulation, 102, 19121916.
  • Gácsi, M., Miklósi, Á., Varga, O., Topál, J., & Csányi, V. (2004). Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human's attention. Animal Cognition, 7, 144153.
  • Garrity, T. F., Stallones, L., Marx, M. B., & Johnson, T. P. (1989). Pet ownership and attachment as supportive factors in the health of the elderly. Anthrozoös, 3, 3544.
  • Haller, J., Makara, G. B., Barna, I., Kovacs, K., Nagy, J., & Vecsernyes, M. (1996). Compression of the pituitary stalk elicits chronic increases in CSF vasopressin, oxytocin as well as in social investigation and aggressiveness. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 8, 361365.
  • Halpin, Z. (1974). Individual differences in the biological odors of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Behavioral Biology, 11, 253259.
  • Hare, B., Brown, M., Williamson, C., & Tomasello, M. (2002). The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science, 298, 16341636.
  • Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 439444.
  • Hayano, J., Sakakibara, Y., Yamada, M., Mukai, S., Fujinami, T., Yokoyama, K., Watanabe, Y., & Takata, K. (1991). Accuracy of assessment of cardiac vagal tone by heart rate variability in normal subjects. American Journal of Cardiology, 67, 199204.
  • Heinrichs, M., Baumgartner, T., Kirschbaum, C., & Ehlert, U. (2003). Social support and oxytocin interact to suppress cortisol and subjective responses to psychosocial stress. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 13891398.
  • Hofer, M. (1995). Hidden regulator: Implications for a new understanding of attachment, separation, and loss. In S.Goldberg, R.Muir, & J.Kerr (Eds.), Attachment theory: Social, developmental, and clinical perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 203230.
  • Holcomb, R., Williams, R., & Richards, P. (1985). The elements of attachment: Relationship maintenance and intimacy. Journal of the Delta Society, 2, 2834.
  • Insel, T. R., & Young, L. J. (2001). The neurobiology of attachment. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 129136.
  • Itakura, S., Ishida, H., Kanda, T., Shimada, Y., Ishiguro, H., & Lee, K. (2008). How to build an intentional android: Infants' imitation of a robot's goal-directed actions. Infancy, 13, 519532.
  • Johnson, T., Garrity, T., & Stallones, L. (1992). Psychometric evaluation of the Lexington attachment to pets scale (LAPS). Anthrozoös, 5, 160175.
  • Kaminski, J., Riedel, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Domestic goats, Capra hircus, follow gaze direction and use social cues in an object choice task. Animal Behaviour, 69, 1118.
  • Keverne, E. B., & Kendrick, K. M. (1992). Oxytocin facilitation of maternal behavior in sheep. New York Academy of Sciences, 652, 83101.
  • Kikusui, T., Winslow, J. T., & Mori, Y. (2006). Social buffering: Relief from stress and anxiety. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361, 22152228.
  • Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435, 673676.
  • Kraemer, G. W. (1992). A psychobiological theory of attachment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 493511.
  • Kruger, K. A., & Serpell, J. A. (2006). Animal-assisted interventions in mental health: Definitions and theoretical foundations. In A. H.Fine (Ed.), Handbook on animal-assisted therapy: Theoretical foundations and guidelines for practice, 2nd edn. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 2138.
  • Levine, S. (2000). Influence of psychological variables on the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. European Journal of Pharmacology, 405, 149160.
  • Levine, S. (2001). Primary social relationships influence the development of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in the rat. Physiology and Behavior, 73, 255260.
  • Levine, S., Lyons, D. M., & Schatzberg, A. F. (1997). Psychobiological consequences of social relationships. New York Academy of Sciences, 807, 210218.
  • Levinson, B. M. (1962). The dog as a “co-therapist”. Mental Hygiene, 46, 5965.
  • Lorenz, K., & Leyhausen, P. (1973). Motivation of human and animal behavior: An ethological view. NewYork: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Ludwig, M. (1998). Dendritic release of vasopressin and oxytocin. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 10, 881895.
  • Ludwig, M., Callahan, M. F., Neumann, I., Landgraf, R., & Morris, M. (1994). Systemic osmotic stimulation increases vasopressin and oxytocin release within the supraoptic nucleus. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 6, 369373.
  • MacDonald, K. (1992). Warmth as a developmental construct: An evolutionary analysis. Development, 63, 753773.
  • Macrae, C. N., Hood, B. M., Milne, A. B., Rowe, A. C., & Mason, M. F. (2002). Are you looking at me? Eye gaze and person perception. Psychological Science, 13, 460464.
    Direct Link:
  • Maros, K., & Dóka, A., & Miklósi, Á. (2008). Behavioural correlation of heart rate changes in family dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 109, 329341.
  • McKinley, J., & Sambrook, T. (2000). Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). and horses (Equus caballus). Animal Cognition, 3, 1322.
  • Mendoza, S. P., Coe, C. L., Lowe, E. L., & Levine, S. (1978). The physiological response to group formation in adult male squirrel monkeys. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 3, 221229.
  • Miklósi, Á., Kubinyi, E., Topál, J., Gácsi, M., Virányi, Z., & Csányi, V. (2003). A simple reason for a big difference wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Current Biology, 13, 763766.
  • Miklósi, Á., Polgárdi, R., Topál, J., & Csányi, V. (2000). Intentional behaviour in dog-human communication: An experimental analysis of “showing” behaviour in the dog. Animal Cognition, 3, 159166.
  • Miklósi, Á., Pongracz, P., Lakatos, G., Topál, J., & Csányi, V. (2005). A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 179186.
  • Miklósi, Á., & Soproni, K. (2006). A comparative analysis of animals' understanding of the human pointing gesture. Animal Cognition, 9, 8193.
  • Montano, N., Ruscone, T., Porta, A., Lombardi, F., Pagani, M., & Malliani, A. (1994). Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability to assess the changes in sympathovagal balance during graded orthostatic tilt. Circulation, 90, 18261831.
  • Morton, J., & Johnson, M. (1991). The perception of facial structure in infancy. In G. R.Lockhead & J. R.Pomerantz (Eds.), The perception of structure. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 317325.
  • Munsell, K. L., Canfield, M., Templer, D. I., Tangan, K., & Arikawa, H. (2004). Modification of the Pet Attitude Scale. Society and Animals, 12, 137142.
  • Nagasawa, M., Kikusui, T., Onaka, T., & Ohta, M. (2009). Dog's gaze at its owner increases owner's urinary oxytocin during social interaction. Hormones and Behavior, 55, 434441.
  • Nelson, E., & Panksepp, J. (1996). Oxytocin mediates acquisition of maternally associated odor preferences in preweanling rat pups. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110, 583592.
  • Neumann, I. D. (2002). Involvement of the brain oxytocin system in stress coping: Interactions with the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. Progress in Brain Research, 139, 147162.
  • Neumann, I. D., Kromer, S. A., Toschi, N., & Ebner, K. (2000). Brain oxytocin inhibits the (re)activity of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in male rats: Involvement of hypothalamic and limbic brain regions. Regulatory Peptides, 96, 3138.
  • Nobis, G. (1979). Der älteste Haushund lebte vor 14,000 Jahren. Umschau, 19, 610.
  • Okumura, N., Ishiguro, N., Nakano, M., Matsui, A., & Sahara, M. (1996). Intra-and interbreed genetic variations of mitochondrial DNA major non-coding regions in Japanese native dog breeds (Canis familiaris). Animal Genetics, 27, 397405.
  • Ory, M. G., & Goldberg, E. L. (1983). Pet possession and well-being in elderly women. Research on Aging, 5, 389.
  • Parker, H. G., Kim, L. V., Sutter, N. B., Carlson, S., Lorentzen, T. D., Malek, T. B., Johnson, G. S., DeFrance, H. B., Ostrander, E. A., & Kruglyak, L. (2004). Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog. Science, 304, 11601164.
  • Pedersen, C., Ascher, J., Monroe, Y., & Prange, A. (1982). Oxytocin induces maternal behavior in virgin female rats. Science, 216, 648650.
  • Pedersen, C. A., Caldwell, J. D., Drago, F., Noonan, L. R., Peterson, G., Hood, L. E., & Prange, A. J. Jr. (1988). Grooming behavioral effects of oxytocin: Pharmacology, ontogeny, and comparisons with other nonapeptides. New York Academy of Sciences, 525, 245256.
  • Pomeranz, B., Macaulay, R., Caudill, M., Kutz, I., Adam, D., Gordon, D., Kilborn, K., Barger, A., Shannon, D., & Cohen, R. (1985). Assessment of autonomic function in humans by heart rate spectral analysis. American Journal of Physiology- “Heart and Circulatory Physiology”, 248, 151153.
  • Poresky, R., Hendrix, C., Mosier, J., & Samuelson, M. (1987). The companion animal bonding scale: Internal reliability and construct validity. Psychological Reports, 60, 743746.
  • Salmon, P., & Salmon, I. (1983). Who owns who? Psychological research into the human-pet bond in Australia. In A. H.Katcher & A. M.Beck (Eds.), New perspectives on our lives with companion animals. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 244265.
  • Savolainen, P., Zhang, Y., Luo, J., Lundeberg, J., & Leitner, T. (2002). Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science, 298, 16101613.
  • Serpell, J. A. (2003). Anthropomorphism and anthropomorphic selection: Beyond the “cute response”. Society and Animals, 11, 83100.
  • Stanton, M. E., Patterson, J. M., & Levine, S. (1985). Social influences on conditioned cortisol secretion in the squirrel monkey. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 10, 125134.
  • Topál, J., Gácsi, M., Miklósi, Á., Virányi, Z., Kubinyi, E., & Csányi, V. (2005). Attachment to humans: A comparative study on hand-reared wolves and differently socialized dog puppies. Animal Behaviour, 70, 13671375.
  • Topál, J., Miklósi, Á., Csányi, V., & Dóka, A. (1998). Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): A new application of Ainsworth's (1969) strange situation test. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 219229.
  • Udell, M. A. R., Dorey, N. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2008). Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Animal Behaviour, 76, 17671773.
  • Uvnas-Moberg, K. (1997). Physiological and endocrine effects of social contact. New York Academy of Sciences, 807, 146163.
  • Vila, C., Savolainen, P., Maldonado, J. E., Amorim, I. R., Rice, J. E., Honeycutt, R. L., Crandall, K. A., Lundeberg, J., & Wayne, R. K. (1997). Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science, 276, 16871691.
  • Viranyi, Z., Gácsi, M., Kubinyi, E., Topál, J., Belényi, B., & Ujfalussy, D., & Miklósi, Á. (2008). Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Animal Cognition, 11, 373387.
  • Virányi, Z., Topál, J., Gácsi, M., Miklósi, Á., & Csányi, V. (2004). Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans' attentional focus. Behavioural Processes, 66, 161172.
  • Virányi, Z., Topál, J., Miklósi, Á., & Csányi, V. (2006). A nonverbal test of knowledge attribution: A comparative study on dogs and children. Animal Cognition, 9, 1326.
  • Wiener, S. G., Johnson, D. F., & Levine, S. (1987). Influence of postnatal rearing conditions on the response of squirrel monkey infants to brief perturbations in mother-infant relationships. Physiology and Behavior, 39, 2126.
  • Wilson, D. A., & Sullivan, R. M. (1994). Neurobiology of associative learning in the neonate: Early olfactory learning. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 61, 118.
  • Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 10481054.
  • Young, L. J., Wang, Z., & Insel, T. R. (1998). Neuroendocrine bases of monogamy. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 7175.