SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950967.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 11731182.
  • Barrick, M. R., Mitchell, T. R., & Stewart, G. L. (2003). Situational and motivational influences on trait-behavior relationship. In M. R.Barrick & A. M.Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 6082.
  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 126.
  • Borman, W. C., & Motowildo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N.Schmidt & W. C.Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 7198.
  • Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N.Schmidt & W.Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 3570.
  • Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715730.
  • Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work-adjustment. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Deci, E. L., & Porac, J. (1978). Cognitive evaluation theory and the study of human motivation. In M. R.Lepper & D.Green (Eds.), The hidden costs of reward. New York: Wiley, pp. 149176.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417440.
  • Eisenberger, R., & Shanock, L. (2003). Rewards, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 121130.
  • Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 4, 290309.
  • George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513524.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L.Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. 2. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 141165.
  • Gottfredson, G. D., & Holland, J. L. (1996). Dictionary of Holland Occupational Codes. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1999). Manual for the Hogan Personality Inventory. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
  • Hough, L. M. (1989). Development of personality measures to supplement selection decisions. In B. J.Fallon, H.Pfister, & J.Brebner (Eds.), Advances in industrial organizational psychology. Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 365375.
  • Hough, L. M. (1992). The “big five” personality variables-construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139155.
  • Howard, A. (1995). A framework for work change. In A.Howard (Ed.), The changing nature of work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 344.
  • Ilgen, D. R., & Pulakos, E. D. (1999). Employee performance in today's organizations. In D. R.Ilgen & E. D.Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 118.
  • John, O. P. (1990). The “big five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A.Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 66100.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörborn, D. (1998). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602619.
  • Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (1997). Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organizational attraction. Personnel Psychology, 50, 359394.
  • Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the big five personality traits in predicting college students' academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 4752.
  • Lawler, E. E. III (1994). Motivation in work organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • London, M., & Mone, E. M. (1999). Continuous learning. In D. L.Ilgen & E. D.Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 119153.
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985). Updating Norman's adequate taxonomy: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710721.
  • METI (2005). A guide to MOT in Japan. Academia-Industry Cooperation Promotion Division, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, <http://www.mot.gr.jp/upload/H17MOT_Pamphlet%281%29English.pdf> (21 Dec 2010).
  • Molloy, J. C., & Noe, R. A. (2009). “Learning” a living: Continuous learning for survival in today's talent market. In W. J.Kozlowski & E.Salas (Eds.), Learning, training, and development in organizations. New York: Routledge, pp. 333361.
  • Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Strauss, J. P. (1994). Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 272280.
  • Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574583.
  • Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679703.
  • Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437453.
  • Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons for goals as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 546557.
  • Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482497.
  • Smith, D. B., & Schneider, B. (2003). Where we've been and where we're going: Some conclusions regarding personality and organizations. In M. R.Barrick & A. M.Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 387404.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S.Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, pp. 290312.
  • Vinchur, A. J., Schippmann, J. S., Switzer, F. S., & Philip, M. K. (1988). A meta-analytic review of predictors of job performance for sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 586597.
  • Wanberg, C. R., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of proactivity in the socialization process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 373385.
  • Watanabe, S., & Kanazawa, Y. (2009). A test of a personality-based view of intrinsic motivation. Japanese Journal of Administrative Science, 22, 117130.
  • White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297333.