SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261278.
  • Belmont, M., Skinner, E., Wellborn, J., & Connell, J. (1988). Teacher as social context: A measure of student perceptions of teacher provision of involvement, structure, and autonomy support (Technical Report No. 102). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
  • Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (1998). Delay of gratification. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 329346.
  • Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 3557.
  • Boekaerts, M., & Niemivirta, M. (2000). Self-regulated learning: Finding a balance between learning goals and ego-protective goals. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, p. 417.
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 136162.
  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
  • Frank, L. K. (1939). Time perspectives. Journal of Social Philosophy, 4, 293312.
  • Gjesme, T. (1996). Future-time orientation and motivation. In T. Gjesme & R. Nygard (Eds.), Advances in motivation. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 210222.
  • Gottfried, A. E., Marcoulides, G. A., Gottfried, A. W., & Oliver, P. H. (2009). A latent curve model of parental practices and developmental decline in math and science academic intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 729739.
  • Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 113125.
  • Lens, W. (1986). Future time perspective: A cognitive-motivational concept. In D. R. Brown & J. Veroff (Eds.), Frontiers of motivational psychology. New York: Springer, pp. 173190.
  • Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
  • Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. Child Development, 60, 981992.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2004). Mplus user's guide. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Nurmi, J. E. (1989). Planning, motivation, and evaluation in orientation to the future: A latent structure analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 30, 6471.
  • Peetsma, T. T. D. (1992). Toekomst als motor? Toekomstperspectieven van leerlingen in het voortgezet onderwijs en hun inzet voor school[The future as an incentive? Secondary education students' perspectives concerning their future and their investment in school]. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
  • Peetsma, T. T. D. (1997). Decline in pupils' motivation during secondary education. Paper presented at the 7th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Athens.
  • Peetsma, T. T. D. (2000). Future time perspective as a predictor of school investment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 177192.
  • Peetsma, T. T. D., Hascher, T., Van der Veen, I., & Roede, E. (2005). Relations between adolescents' self-evaluations, time perspectives, motivation for school and their achievement in different countries and at different ages. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 209225.
  • Peetsma, T., & Van der Veen, I. (2008). A second research study on influencing students' motivation in the lowest level of secondary education. Paper presented at the XIth International Conference on Motivation (ICM), Turku.
  • Peetsma, T., & Van der Veen, I. (2009). Influencing students' motivation for school; the case for first-year students in the Netherlands in the lowest level of secondary school. In M. Wosnitza, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efkllides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global tot local perspectives. Göttingen: Hogrefe, pp. 299320.
  • Peetsma, T., & Van der Veen, I. (2011). Relations between the development of future time perspective in three life domains, investment in learning, and academic achievement. Learning and Instruction, 21, 481494.
  • Piaget, J. (1955). The development of time concept in the child. In P. Hoch & J. Zubin (Eds.), Psychopathology of childhood. New York: Grune & Stratton, pp. 3444.
  • Stouthard, M. E. A., & Peetsma, T. T. D. (1999). Future-time perspective: Analysis of a facet-designed questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 99105.
  • Thoonen, E., Sleegers, P., Peetsma, T., & Oort, F. (2011). Can teachers motivate students to learn? Educational Studies, 37, 345361.
  • Waslander, S. (2004). Wat scholen beweegt; over massa-maatwerk, onderwijspraktijk en examens in het voortgezet onderwijs[What moves schools: About mass-tailored work, education practice and exams in secondary education. Arnhem: Cito.
  • Zhang, L., Karabenick, S. A., Maruno, S., & Lauermann, F. (2011). Academic delay of gratification and children's study time allocation as a function of proximity to consequential academic goals. Learning and Instruction, 21, 7794.
  • Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 12711288.