• Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bauer, M.W. and Gaskell, G. 2002. Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Billig, M. 1993. Studying the Thinking Society: Social Representations, Rhetoric, and Attitudes. In G.Breakwell and D.Cantor’ (Eds.), Empirical Approaches to Social Representations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3962.
  • Durkheim, E. 1898. Representations Individuelles et Representations Collectives. Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale, 6, 273302.
  • Farr, R. 1998. From Collective to Social Representations: Aller et Retour. Culture and Psychology, 4(3): 275296.
  • Foster, J.L. 2003. Representational Projects and Interacting Forms of Knowledge. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(3): 231244.
  • Garfinkel, H. 1984. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Polity Press Cambridge, UK.
  • Gillespie, A. 2006. Becoming Other: From Social Interaction to Self-Reflection. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Habermas, J. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Jovchelovitch, S. 1995. Social Representations in and of the Public Sphere: Towards a Theoretical Articulation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 25(1): 81102.
  • Jovchelovitch, S. 2007. Knowledge in Context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Laing, R.D., Phillipson, H., and Lee, A.R. 1966. Interpersonal Perception: A Theory and Method of Research. London: Tavistock Publications.
  • Marková, I. 2003. Dialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Moscovici, S. 1972. Theory and Society in Social Psychology. In J.Israel and H.Tajfel (Eds.), Context of Social Psychology: A Critical Assessment. London: Academic Press, pp. 1768.
  • Moscovici, S. 1973. Foreword in C. Herzlich, Health and Illness: A Social Psychological Analysis. In. London: Academic Press.
  • Moscovici, S. 1994. Social Representations and Pragmatic Communication. Social Science Information, 33(2): 163177.
  • Moscovici, S. 2008. Psychoanalysis: Its Image and Its Public. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. (originally published in 1971 and 1976)
  • Pigg, S.L. 1996. The Credible and the Credulous: The Question of “Villagers’ Beliefs” in Nepal. Cultural Anthropology, 11(2): 160201.
  • Trey, G. 1998. Solidarity and Difference: The Politics of Enlightenment in the Aftermath of Modernity. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Valsiner, J. 2005. Scaffolding within the Structure of Dialogical Self: Hierarchical Dynamics of Semiotic Mediation. New Ideas in Psychology, 23(3): 197206.
  • Dijk, T.A. 1980. Text and Context. New York: Longman New York.
  • Voelklein, C. and Howarth, C. 2005. A Review of Controversies about Social Representations Theory: A British Debate. Culture & Psychology, 11(4): 431454.
  • Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Themel, M., and Verma, J. 1999. The Modernization of Tradition: Thinking about Madness in Patna, India. Culture & Psychology, 5(4): 413445.