SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abell, J., Condor, S., & Stevenson, C. (2006). “We are an island”: Geographical imagery in accounts of citizenship, civil society, and national identity in Scotland and in England. Political Psychology, 27(2), 207226.
  • Ali, L., & Sonn, C. (2010). Constructing identity as a second-generation Cypriot Turkish in Australia: The multi-hyphenated other. Culture & Psychology, 16(3), 416436.
  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
  • Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385405.
  • Augoustinos, M. (2001). Social categorization: Towards theoretical integration. In K. Deaux, & G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 201216). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Augoustinos, M., & Riggs, D. (2007). Representing “us” and “them”: Constructing white identities in everyday talk. In G. Moloney, & I. Walker (Eds.), Social representations and identity: Content, process, and power (pp. 109130). New York: Palgrave McMillan.
  • Barnes, R., Auburn, T., & Lea, S. (2004). Citizenship in practice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 187206.
  • Batel, S., & Castro, P. (2009). A social representations approach to the communication between different spheres: An analysis of the impacts of two discursive formats. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39(4), 415433.
  • Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29(2), 163186.
  • Bauer, M., Durant, J., & Gaskell, G. (2002). Biotechnology—the making of a global controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture. Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others. Aliens, residents and citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77101.
  • Castles, S. (2005). Nation and empire: Hierarchies of citizenship in the new global order. International Politics, 42, 203224.
  • Castro, P. (2012). Legal innovation for social change: Exploring change and resistance to different types of sustainability laws. Political Psychology, 33(1), 105121.
  • Condor, S. (2011). Towards a social psychology of citizenship? Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 21, 193201.
  • Condor, S., & Gibson, S. (2007). “Everybody's entitled to their own opinion”: Ideological dilemmas of liberal individualism and active citizenship. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17, 115140.
  • Deaux, K. (2000). Surveying the landscape of immigration: Social psychological perspectives. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 10, 421431.
  • Deaux, K. (2006). To be an immigrant. New York: Russell Sage.
  • Deaux, K. (2008). To be an American: Immigration, hyphenation, and incorporation. Journal of Social Issues, 64(4), 925943.
  • Deaux, K., & Wiley, S. (2007). Moving people and shifting representations: Making immigrant identities. In G. Moloney, & I. Walker (Eds.), Social representations and identity: Content, process and power (pp. 930). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dixon, J. A., & Durrheim, K. (2000). Displacing place identity: A discursive approach to locating self and other. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 2744.
  • Duveen, G. (2001). Representations, identities, resistance. In K. Deaux, & G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social (pp. 257270). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Elcheroth, G., Doise, W., & Reicher, S. (2011). On the knowledge of politics and the politics of knowledge: How a social representations approach helps us rethink the subject of political psychology. Political Psychology, 32(5), 729758.
  • Gibson, S. (2011). Dilemmas of citizenship: Young people's conceptions of un/employment rights and responsibilities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 450468.
  • Gibson, S., & Hamilton, L. (2011). The rhetorical construction of polity membership: Identity, culture and citizenship in young people's discussions of immigration in Northern Ireland. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 21, 228242.
  • Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1992). Beyond “culture”: Space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cultural Anthropology, 7(1), 623.
  • Haste, H. (2004). Constructing the citizen. Political Psychology, 25(3), 413439.
  • Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2010). Interrogating tears: Some uses of “tag questions” in a child protection helpline . In A. F. Freed, & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), “Why do you ask?”: The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 6986). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hohl, K., & Gaskell, G. (2008). European public perceptions of food risk: Cross-national and methodological comparisons. Risk Analysis, 28(2), 311324.
  • Holtug, N., & Mason, A. (2011). Immigration, diversity and social cohesion. Ethnicities, 10(4), 407414.
  • Holtz, P., & Wagner, W. (2009). Essentialism and attribution of monstrosity in racist discourse: Right-wing internet postings about Africans and Jews. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19, 411425.
  • Home Office (2008a). The path to citizenship: Next steps in reforming the immigration system. Croydon, UK: Home Office.
  • Home Office (2008b). Path to citizenship: Next steps in reforming the immigration system: Analysis of consultation responses. Croydon, UK: Home Office.
  • Home Office (2008c). Path to citizenship: Next steps in reforming the immigration system: Government response to consultation. Croydon, UK: Home Office.
  • Home Office (2009). Earning the right to stay: A new points test for citizenship. Croydon, UK: Home Office.
  • Hopkins, N., & Blackwood, L. (2011). Everyday citizenship: Identity and recognition. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 21, 215227.
  • Howarth, C. (2002).“So, you're from Brixton?”: The struggle for recognition and esteem in a multicultural community. Ethnicities, 2(2), 237260.
  • Howarth, C. (2004). Re-presentation and resistance in the context of school exclusion: Reasons to be critical. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 356377.
  • Howarth, C. (2006). A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 6586.
  • Howarth, C. (2007). “It's not their fault that they have that colour skin, is it?”: Young British children and the possibilities for contesting racializing representations. In G. Moloney, & I. Walker (Eds.), Social representations and identity: Content, process, and power (pp. 131156). New York: Palgrave McMillan.
  • Howarth, C. (2009). “I hope we won't have to understand racism one day”: Researching or reproducing “race” in social psychological research? British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 407426.
  • Jodelet, D. (1991). Madness and social representations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
  • Jones, E., & Gaventa, J. (2002). Concepts of citizenship: A review. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
  • Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. New York: Routledge.
  • Kinnvall, C., & Nesbitt-Larking, P. (2011). Citizenship regimes and identity strategies among young Muslims in Europe. In A. E. Azzi, X. Chryssochoou, B. Klandermans, & B. Simon (Eds.), Identity and participation in culturally diverse societies: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 195219). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Kohn, H. (1944). The idea of nationalism: A study of its origins and background. New York: Macmillan.
  • Kostakopoulou, D. (2003). Why naturalisation? Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 4(1), 85115.
  • Kronberger, N., & Wagner, W. (2000). Keywords in context: Statistical analysis of text features. In M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook (pp. 299317). London: Sage.
  • Lahlou, S. (1996). A method to extract social representations from linguistic corpora. The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(3), 278291.
  • Lloyd, B., & Duveen, G. (1992). Gender identities and education: The impact of starting school. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • McGhee, D. (2005). Intolerant Britain? Hate, citizenship and difference. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Minard, R. D. (1952). Race relations in the Pocahontas coal field. Journal of Social Issues, 8, 2944.
  • Moghaddam, F. M. (2008). Multiculturalism and intergroup relations: Psychological implications for democracy in global context. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
  • Moscovici, S. (1961/1998). Η ψυχανάλυση, ηεικόνατης καιτοκοινό της [La Psychoanalyse, son image et son public] (M. Kolonias, Trans.). Athens: Οδυσσέας.
  • Moscovici, S. (1973). Foreward. In C. Herzlich (Ed.), Health and illness: A social psychological analysis. London: Academic Press [for] the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology.
  • Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Social cognition. London: Academic Press in cooperation with the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology.
  • Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. Farr & S. Mascovici, (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 370). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211250.
  • Nieguth, T. (1999). Beyond dichotomy: Concepts of the nation and the distribution of membership. Nations and Nationalism, 5(2), 155173.
  • Philogène, G. (2007). Social representations of alterity in the United States. In G. Moloney & I. Walker (Eds.), Social representations and identity: Content, process, and power (pp. 3142). New York: Palgrave McMillan.
  • Purkhardt, S. C. (1993). Transforming social representations: A social psychology of common sense and science. London: Routledge.
  • Reicher, S. (2004). The context of social identity: Domination, resistance and change. Political Psychology, 26(6), 921945.
  • Scuzzarello, S. (2012). Migrants' integration in Western Europe: Bridging social psychology and political science. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22, 119.
  • Tajfel, H. (1978). The social psychology of minorities. A minority rights group international report. London: Minority Rights Group.
  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, B. S. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. C. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  • Taylor, C. (1992). Multiculturalism and “the politics of recognition”. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Wagner, W., & Kronberger, N. (2002). Discours et appropriation symbolique de la biotechnologie. In C. Garnier & M.-L. Rouquette (Eds.), Les formes de la penseé sociale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Wagner, W., Holtz, P., & Kashima, Y. (2009). Construction and deconstruction of essence in representing social groups: Identity projects, stereotyping, and racism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39(3), 363383.
  • Weiss, A. (2005). The transnationalization of social inequality: Conceptualizing social positions on a world scale. Current Sociology, 53(4), 707728.
  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Zittoun, T., Duveen, G., Gillespie, A., Ivinson, G., & Psaltis, C. (2003). The use of symbolic resources in developmental transitions. Culture & Psychology, 9(4), 415448.