Genetic Enhancement and Moral Attitudes Toward the Given
Article first published online: 8 NOV 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2011.00545.x
© Society for Applied Philosophy, 2011
Additional Information
How to Cite
MCCONNELL, T. (2011), Genetic Enhancement and Moral Attitudes Toward the Given. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 28: 369–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2011.00545.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 8 NOV 2011
- Article first published online: 8 NOV 2011
abstract
Several authors, including Michael Sandel, distinguish between two different attitudes toward nature: mastery and giftedness. Giftedness is the superior attitude, Sandel argues, because it better accords with the values of humility, responsibility, and solidarity. And giftedness, in combination with these values, provides a rational basis for opposing the employment of genetic enhancement. Against this, I argue that talents and genetic endowment are more plausibly viewed as undeserved, that not everything undeserved is a gift, and that even if talents and endowment were gifts, this would not support a prohibition against pursuing genetic enhancement.

1468-5930/asset/japp_left.jpg?v=1&s=3074425828e51b304674bdd7ff33179220ef122d)
