SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Archer, C. (2006) ‘The Nordic States and the European Security and Defence Policy: National, Nordic, Baltic or European?’. Unpublished paper.
  • Archer, C. and Nugent, N. (2002) ‘Introduction: Small States and the European Union. Current Politics and Economics of Europe, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 110.
  • Arter, D. (2000) ‘Small State Influence Within the EU: The Case of Finland's Northern Dimension Initiative. JCMS, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 67797.
  • Bergman, A. (2006) ‘Adjacent Internationalism: The Concept of Solidarity and Post-Cold War Nordic-Baltic Relations’. Co-operation and Conflict, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 758.
  • Björkdahl, A. (2002) From Idea to Norm. Promoting Conflict Prevention (Lund: Lund Political Studies 125).
  • Braud, P.-A. and Grevi, G. (2005) ‘The EU Mission in Aceh: Implementing Peace. Occasional Papers, No. 61 (Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies).
  • Börzel, T.A. (2002) ‘Pace-Setting, Foot-Dragging and Fence-Sitting: Member State Responses to Europeanization. JCMS, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 193214.
  • Christoff, J.A. and St Laurent, J.A. (2007) ‘Stabilization and Reconstruction. Actions Needed to Improve Governmentwide Planning and Capabilities for Future Operations’. United States Government Accountability Office, GAO-08-228T.
  • Cologne European Council (1999) Presidency Conclusions. Brussels, SN 150/99, 3 and 4 June.
  • Demiri, E. and Vlioras, E. (2004) ‘The Greek Contribution to CFSP and Civilian Crisis Management’. Paper for FORNET, Sofia, 12 October.
  • Dwan, R. (2005) ‘Civilian Tasks and Capabilities in EU Operations’. In Glasius, M. and Kaldor, M. (eds) A Human Security Doctrine for Europe (London: Routledge), pp. 26489.
  • Eliasson, J. (2004) ‘Traditions, Identity and Security: the Legacy of Neutrality in Finnish and Swedish Security Policies in Light of European Integration. European Integration Online Papers, Vol. 8, No. 6.
  • Elgström, O. (2000) ‘Norm Negotiations. The Construction of New Norms Regarding Gender and Development in EU Foreign Aid Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 45776.
  • Elgström, O. (2002) ‘Evaluating the Swedish Presidency. Co-operation and Conflict, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 1839.
  • Enos-Attali, S. (2005) ‘Non-Aligned States in the EU: An Example of Europeanization in the Field of Foreign and Security Policy?’ Paper for the LSE KCL European Foreign Policy Conference.
  • Forsberg, T. and Vaahtoranta, T. (2001) ‘Paradoxes of Post-Neutrality: Finnish and Swedish Views of Nato and the ESDP. European Security, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 6893.
  • Forster, A. (1997) ‘Defence and European Integration. Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 297315.
  • Flournoy, M., Smith, J., Ben-Ari, G., McInnis, K. and Scruggs, D. (2005) European Defence Integration: Bridging the Gap between Strategy and Capabilities (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies).
  • Friis, L. (1998) ‘ “The End of the Beginning” of Eastern Enlargement – Luxembourg Summit and Agenda-Setting. European Integration Online Papers, Vol. 2, No. 7.
  • Gegout, C. (2002) ‘The Quint: Acknowledging the Existence of a Big Four-US Directoire at the Heart of the European Union's Foreign Policy Decision-Making Process. JCMS, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 33144.
  • Græger, N., Larsen, H. and Ojanen, H. (2002) ‘Conclusions: Fourfold “Nuisance Power” or Four Contributors to the ESDP?’ In Græger, N., Larsen, H. and Ojanen, H. (eds) The ESDP and the Nordic Countries. Four Variations on a Theme (Kauhava: Kauhavan sanomalehti for The Finnish Institute of International Affairs and Institut für Europäische Politik), pp. 21836.
  • Gourlay, C. (2006) Rosters for the Deployment of Civilian Experts in Peace Operations (New York: UN DPKO).
  • Halonen, T. (2000) Lecture by President of the Republic Tarja Halonen at the Norwegian Institute of International Relations (NUPI) in Oslo on 26.10.2000 (Helsinki: Office of the President of Finland).
  • Helsinki European Council (1999) Presidency Conclusions. Brussels, SN 300/99, 9 and 10 December.
  • Hoffmann, S. (2000) ‘Towards a Common European Foreign and Security Policy? JCMS, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 18998.
  • Honkanen, K. (2002) The Influence of Small States on NATO Decision-Making: The Membership Experience of Denmark, Norway, Hungary and the Czech Republic (Stockholm: FOI-Swedish Defence Research Agency).
  • Huldt, B. (1998) ‘Nordic Security – A Historical Perspective’. In Jopp, M. and Warjovaara, R. (eds) Approaching the Northern Dimension of the CFSP: Challenges and Opportunities for the EU in the Emerging European Security Order (Forssa: Finnish Institute of International Affairs and Institut für Europäische Politik), pp. 3749.
  • Ingebritsen, C. (2002) ‘Norm Entrepreneurs: Scandinavia's Role in World Politics. Co-operation and Conflict, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 1123.
  • Jakobsen, P.V. (2003) ‘Military Forces and Public Security Challenges’. In Pugh, M. and Sidhu, W.P.S. (eds) The UN and Regional Security: Europe and Beyond (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers), pp. 13753.
  • Jakobsen, P.V. (2006a) ‘The ESDP and Civilian Rapid Reaction: Adding Value is Harder than Expected. European Security, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 299321.
  • Jakobsen, P.V. (2006b) Nordic Approaches to Peace Operations: A New Model in the Making? (London, New York: Routledge).
  • Jonson, P. (2006) The Development of the European Security and Defence Policy – An Assessment of Preferences, Bargains and Outcomes (Stockholm: FOI-Swedish Defence Research Agency).
  • Jørgensen, K.E. (1999) ‘Possibilities of a “Nordic” Influence on the Development of the CFSP’. In Jopp, M. and Ojanen, H. (eds) European Security Integration. Implications for Non-Alignment and Alliances (Finland: Finnish Institute of International Affairs and Institut für Europäische Politik and WEU Institute for Security Studies), pp. 10336.
  • Kassim, H. and Menon, A. (2004) ‘European Integration Since the 1990s: Member States and the European Commission’. ARENA seminar, University of Oslo, 11 February.
  • Keohane, R.O. (1986) ‘Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond’. In Keohane, R.O. (ed.) Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 158203.
  • Kingdon, J.W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (Boston, MA: Little Brown).
  • Knutsen, B. (2000) ‘The Nordic Dimension in the Evolving European Security Structure and the Role of Norway. Occasional Papers, No. 22 (Paris: Institute for Security Studies Western European Union).
  • Kronsell, A. (2002) ‘Can Small States Influence EU Norms? Insights from Sweden's Participation in the Field of Environmental Politics. Scandinavian Studies, Vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 287304.
  • Laatikainen, K.V. (2003) ‘Norden's Eclipse: The Impact of the European Union's Common Foreign and Security Policy on the Nordic Group in the United Nations. Co-operation and Conflict, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 40941.
  • Larsen, H. (2000) ‘Concepts of Security in the European Union After the Cold War. Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 33755.
  • Larsen, H. (2002) ‘Denmark and the EU's Defence Dimension: Opt-out Across the Board?’. In Græger, N., Larsen, H. and Ojanen, H. (eds) The ESDP and the Nordic Countries. Four Variations on a Theme (Kauhava: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs and Institut für Europäische Politik), pp. 90153.
  • Larsen, H. (2005) Analysing the Foreign Policy of Small States in the EU. The Case of Denmark (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
  • Lindh, A. and Tuomioja, E. (2000) ‘Katastrofhjälpen duger inte. Dagens Nyheter, 30 April, p. A04.
  • Maes, I. and Verdun, A. (2005) ‘Small States and the Creation of EMU: Belgium and the Netherlands, Pace-Setters and Gate-Keepers. JCMS, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 393412.
  • Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? JCMS, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 23558.
  • Matthiessen, M. (2005) ‘Enhancing Nordic Peace Diplomacy Through the EU: Constraints and Opportunities’. Presentation at DIIS conference: Nordic Peace Diplomacy: Looking Back, Moving Forward, Copenhagen, 24 February.
  • Mouritzen, H. (1998) ‘A Fragmented North’. In Jopp, M. and Warjovaara, R. (eds) Approaching the Northern Dimension of the CFSP: Challenges and Opportunities for the EU in the Emerging European Security Order (Forssa: Finnish Institute of International Affairs and Institut für Europäische Politik), pp. 558.
  • Miles, L. (2000) ‘Sweden and Finland’. In Manners, I. and Whitman, R. (eds) The Foreign Policies of European Union Member States (Manchester: Manchester University Press), pp. 181203.
  • Nilsson, M. (2003) Europeisk säkerhets- och försvarspolitik – en studie om svenska möjligheter att påverka (Stockholm: FOI-Swedish Defence Research Agency).
  • Ojanen, H. (2000) ‘Participation and Influence: Finland, Sweden and The Post-Amsterdam Development of the CFSP. Occasional Papers, No. 11 (Paris: Institute for Security Studies Western European Union).
  • Ojanen, H. (2002) ‘Sweden and Finland: What Difference Does it Make to be Non-Aligned?’ In Græger, N., Larsen, H. and Ojanen, H. (eds) The ESDP and the Nordic Countries. Four Variations on a Theme (Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs; Berlin: Institut für Europäische Politik), pp. 154217.
  • Ojanen, H. (2005) ‘Finland: Rediscovering Its Nordic Neighbours After an EU Honeymoon? Security Dialogue, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 40711.
  • Olsen, G.R. and Pilegaard, J. (2005) ‘The Costs of Non-Europe? Denmark and the Common Security and Defence Policy. European Security, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 33960.
  • Pedersen, T. (2003) ‘Questions of Leadership. Co-operation and Conflict, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 299304.
  • Posen, B. (2006) ‘European Union Security and Defence Policy: Response to Unipolarity? Security Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 14986.
  • Rieker, P. (2004) ‘The European Union and the Changing Security Identities of the Nordic States. Co-operation and Conflict, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 36992.
  • Romsloe, B. (2004) ‘EU's External Policy: Are Lilliputians Impotent or Potent? The Case of Crisis Management in the Amsterdam Treaty. Arena Working Paper, 04/22.
  • Romsloe, B. (2005) ‘Finland and the Case of a Northern Dimension for the EU: Inclusion by Bargaining or Arguing? Arena Working Paper, 05/31.
  • Schumacher, T. (2006) ‘Conditions of Nordic Co-operation within the European Union. Unpublished paper.
  • Solana, J. (2006) ‘Speech by Javier Solana, EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy’. Graduation Ceremony ESDC High Level Training Course, Stockholm, 17 March.
  • Svahn, S.S. (1999) ‘Finland at the Helm: Steering the EU into a New Millennium. Scandinavian Review, Vol. 87, No. 1, pp. 49.
  • Strömvik, M. (2006) ‘Starting to Think Big: the Nordic Countries and EU Peace Building’. In Bailes, A.J.K., Herolf, G. and Sundelius, B. (eds) The Nordic Countries and the European Security and Defence Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 199214.
  • Tallberg, J. (2004) ‘The Power of the Presidency: Brokerage, Efficiency and Distribution in EU Negotiations. JCMS, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 9991022.
  • Wallace, H. (2005) ‘Power and Influence: Assessing Member States' Roles in EU Governance and Negotiation’. In Bulmer, S. and Lequesne, C. (eds) Member States and the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 2544.
  • Wivel, A. (2005) ‘The Security Challenge of Small EU Member States: Interests, Identity and the Development of the EU as a Security Actor. JCMS, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 393412.