Macrolide-resistance mechanisms in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from Belgium
Article first published online: 10 FEB 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01077.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Van Eldere, J., Meekers, E., Lagrou, K., Massonet, C., Canu, A., Devenyns, I., Verhaegen, J., Syrogiannopoulos, G. and Leclercq, R. (2005), Macrolide-resistance mechanisms in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from Belgium. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 11: 332–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01077.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 10 FEB 2005
- Article first published online: 10 FEB 2005
- Original Submission: 1 July 2004; Revised Submission: 25 October 2004; Accepted: 19 November 2004
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- erm(B);
- macrolide resistance;
- mef(A);
- pneumococci;
- resistance;
- Streptococcus pneumoniae
Abstract
Of 233 erythromycin-resistant pneumococcal isolates collected in Belgium in 1999–2000, 89.7% carried the erm(B) gene, 6% the mef(A) gene, and 3.5%erm(B) plus mef(A). Two isolates contained neither erm(B) nor mef(A); one contained an erm(A) subclass erm(TR) gene, while the other contained an A2058G mutation in domain V of the 23S rRNA gene. Of 209 erm(B)-positive isolates, 191 had clindamycin MICs > 16 mg/L and 18 had MICs ≤ 16 mg/L. Mef(A)-positive isolates all displayed the M resistance phenotype. Telithromycin remained active against erythromycin-resistant isolates, with the highest telithromycin MIC50 being found in mef(A)-positive isolates. No difference in the prevalence of different resistance mechanisms was observed compared to isolates collected in 1995–1997.

1469-0691/asset/bannerforeground.jpg?v=1&s=d64312ac8b913a4f04c6e0a755daba751d8d8d8d)
