SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • blaZ;
  • PCR;
  • penicillinase;
  • phenotypic assays;
  • sensitivity testing;
  • Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Acknowledgements
  4. References

Penicillinase testing is required for Staphylococcus aureus isolates with a penicillin MIC of ≤0.12 mg/L. This study compared five phenotypic assays with a PCR for blaZ when testing 197 S. aureus isolates. The starch–iodine plate method and nitrocefin tests had low sensitivities of 42.9% and 35.7%, respectively. The cloverleaf assay and the penicillin zone-edge determination method had sensitivities of 67.8% and 71.4%, respectively, and these methods might be appropriate in many circumstances, but were not as sensitive as blaZ PCR.

Resistance to penicillin in Staphylococcus aureus is mediated by production of a penicillinase, encoded by blaZ. Four types of penicillinase (termed A–D) have been described in S. aureus, all of which are Ambler class A β-lactamases [1]. Reliable detection of penicillinase production is important because penicillin is considered to be superior to oxacillin against isolates that do not produce a penicillinase. An erroneus report of penicillin susceptibility could result in potentially inadequate therapy of S. aureus infections. A penicillin MIC of ≤0.12 mg/L is formally in the sensitive range, but the CLSI recommends that additional testing should be performed [2]. The aim of the present study was to compare five phenotypic methods for penicillinase detection, i.e., penicillin disk-diffusion, penicillin zone-edge determination, a cloverleaf assay, nitrocefin tests and a starch–iodine plate method, against a PCR assay for blaZ when testing the sub-population of isolates with a penicillin MIC in the formally sensitive range according to the Vitek  2 system (bioMérieux, Durham, NC, USA).

Consecutive non-duplicate isolates of S. aureus (= 197) were collected if their penicillin MIC according to Vitek  2 was ≤0.12 mg/L. Disk-diffusion tests for penicillin were performed according to CLSI recommendations [2] (10-U disk; Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). The penicillin zone-edge was checked for a sharp edge with discrete full-sized colonies right at the edge, or for a tapered edge with a gradual decrease in growth [3]. A sharp edge was considered to be indicative of penicillinase production. Zone inhibition diameters were measured, with a diameter of ≤28 mm for penicillin being considered to be penicillinase-positive [2]. The cloverleaf assay was performed as described previously [4], except that S. aureus ATCC  25923 was used as the indicator strain on Mueller–Hinton agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Testing with nitrocefin sticks (Oxoid) was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with colonies located at the penicillin zone-edge, and was read after 5, 15 and 60 min. The starch–iodine plate method was performed as described previously [4], except that oxacillin (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany) 0.2 mg/L was used for penicillinase induction instead of methicillin. Decolourisation under and around the colonies was considered to be a positive result.

Primers for amplification of blaZ, designed according to blaZ sequences published previously, were stau-blaZ-fwd (5′-CAAAGATGA TATAGTTGCTTATTCTCC) and stau-blaZ-rev (5′-TGCTTGACCACTTTTATCAGC). PCRs were performed in 50-μL volumes containing 200 μM each dNTP, 1 μM each primer, 10 μL template DNA, 1.25 U Taq polymerase (GE Healthcare, Munchen, Germany) and the reaction buffer supplied by the manufacturer. Cycling conditions comprised 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The PCR was evaluated with known S. aureus strains producing penicillinases  A–D [1], kindly provided by D. Kernodle (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA). The S. aureus-specific PCR for SA442 [5] was also performed for all isolates as a control.

Of 197 S. aureus isolates with a penicillin MIC of ≤0.12 mg/L according to Vitek  2, 28 (14.2%) were positive for blaZ according to the PCR assay. All isolates with a penicillin MIC of 0.03 mg/L according to Vitek  2 were blaZ-negative. Five (6.2%) of 81 isolates with a penicillin MIC of 0.06 mg/L, and 23 (23.2%) of 99 isolates with a penicillin MIC of 0.12 mg/L were blaZ-positive. Of all 28 blaZ-positive isolates, 19 (67.8%) were detected in the cloverleaf assay, 20 (71.4%) were detected by zone-edge determination, 12 (42.9%) were detected by the starch–iodine plate method, and seven (25%), ten (35.7%) and 11 (39.3%) were detected by the nitrocefin assay after incubation for 5, 15 and 60 min, respectively. The use of a breakpoint of ≤28 mm in penicillin disk-diffusion tests, recommended by the CLSI for categorising an isolate as penicillin-resistant [2], resulted in a sensitivity of 57.1%. Overlapping zone inhibition diameters for blaZ-positive and -negative isolates were found for penicillin (Fig. 1). None of the isolates that had a positive phenotypic test for penicillinase production was negative according to the blaZ PCR assay.

image

Figure 1.  Inhibition zone diameters obtained with a 10-U penicillin disk in disk-diffusion tests performed according to CLSI recommendations [2].

Download figure to PowerPoint

In contrast to previous reports, an unacceptably low sensitivity of 39.3% was found for nitrocefin tests, even after induction by penicillin and incubation for 60 min. Sensitivities reported previously for nitrocefin tests were 82% [6], 86.2% [7], 95.6% [8], 70.8–97.9%, depending on the induction method and agar used [4], and 62.1–100%, depending on the manufacturer of the nitrocefin assay [9]. In addition, a sensitivity of 100% has been reported previously for the starch–iodine plate method following penicillinase induction [4]. In the present study, the most sensitive phenotypic tests were penicillin zone-edge determination (71.4%) and the cloverleaf assay (67.8%). Sensitivities of 93.8% [8], 97.9% [4] and 96.6% [9] for the cloverleaf assay have been reported previously. Overlapping inhibition zone diameters for blaZ-positive and -negative isolates were found when performing disk-diffusion with penicillin disks, also as reported previously. Isolates with a zone diameter of ≤28 mm, as recommended by CLSI [2], were all blaZ-positive in the present study, but a larger diameter did not exclude the presence of blaZ.

The reduced sensitivities of phenotypic tests in the present study might have been caused by the use of a highly selected collection of isolates, all of which had a low penicillin MIC according to Vitek  2. In contrast to previous studies, a molecular method was used as the reference standard. Pitkäläet al. [9] also used PCR detection of blaZ as the reference standard, but only with bovine S. aureus isolates.

In conclusion, the results of this study discourage the use of nitrocefin tests or the starch–iodine plate method as additional assays for isolates with penicillin MICs of 0.06 or 0.12 mg/L according to the Vitek  2 system. Higher sensitivities were found for penicillin zone-edge determination and the cloverleaf assay, but it might be insufficient to report an isolate from a serious infection as penicillin-sensitive without performing a PCR to detect blaZ.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Acknowledgements
  4. References

This work was presented, in part, at the 17th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (Munich, 2007). The authors declare that they have no conflicting interests in relation to this work.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Acknowledgements
  4. References
  • 1
    Zygmunt DJ, Stratton CW, Kernodle DS. Characterization of four beta-lactamases produced by Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1992; 36: 440445.
  • 2
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 16th informational supplement, M100-S16. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2006.
  • 3
    Gill VJ, Manning CB, Ingalls CM. Correlation of penicillin minimum inhibitory concentrations and penicillin zone edge appearance with staphylococcal beta-lactamase production. J Clin Microbiol 1981; 14: 437440.
  • 4
    Petersson AC, Eliasson I, Kamme C, Miörner H. Evaluation of four qualitative methods for detection of beta-lactamase production in Staphylococcus and Micrococcus species. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1989; 8: 962967.
  • 5
    Shrestha NK, Tuohy MJ, Hall GS, Isada CM, Procop GW. Rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus and the mecA gene from BacT/ALERT blood culture bottles by using the LightCycler system. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 26592661.
  • 6
    Banič S, Dragaš AZ, Fišer J. Comparison of the efficiency of three methods for the determination of staphylococcal beta-lactamase. J Chemother 1990; 2: 1719.
  • 7
    Bruun B, Gahrn-Hansen B. Mecillinam susceptibility as an indicator of beta-lactamase production in Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect 2002; 8: 122124.
  • 8
    Jarløv JO, Rosdahl VT. Quantitative determination of beta-lactamase production in Staphylococcus aureus strains compared to qualitative testing by a microbiological clover leaf test, a chromogenic cephalosporin test and a iodometric test. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand [B] 1986; 94: 415421.
  • 9
    Pitkälä A, Salmikivi L, Bredbacka P, Myllyniemi A, Koskinen MT. Comparison of tests for detection of beta-lactamase-producing staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45: 20312033.