Get access

Estimating tropical forest ungulate densities from sign surveys using abundance models of occupancy

Authors

  • A. M. Gopalaswamy,

    Corresponding author
    1. Wildlife Conservation Society – India Program, Bengaluru, India
    2. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), Department of Zoology, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, University of Oxford, Abingdon, UK
    • Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bengaluru, India
    Search for more papers by this author
  • K. U. Karanth,

    1. Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bengaluru, India
    2. Wildlife Conservation Society – India Program, Bengaluru, India
    3. Wildlife Conservation Society – Global Conservation Program, Bronx, NY, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • N. S. Kumar,

    1. Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bengaluru, India
    2. Wildlife Conservation Society – India Program, Bengaluru, India
    Search for more papers by this author
  • D. W. Macdonald

    1. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), Department of Zoology, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, University of Oxford, Abingdon, UK
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Editor: Res Altwegg
  • Associate Editor: Nick Isaac

Correspondence

Arjun M. Gopalaswamy, Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), Department of Zoology, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, University of Oxford, Tubney, Abingdon, OX13 5QL, UK. Tel: +44 1865 611 100; Fax: +44 1865 611 101

Email: arjungswamy@gmail.com

Abstract

Large ungulates critically influence forest structure and functioning besides being seriously threatened by anthropogenic pressures. For assessing their populations, surveys of ungulate sign encounters are widely used because of their practicality. However, these yield unreliable results because of their failure to address the problem of imperfect detection. Here, we present an innovative application to address this key weakness in traditional ungulate sign surveys. We describe the ecological process of ungulate sign deposition as well as the observation process of sign detection in our modelling. We simulate 183 ecological and sampling-related parameter values to first evaluate model performance. Simulation results demonstrate that we can achieve good estimates of animal density when the radius of the animal daily movement range is accounted for during survey design. We design and conduct a field survey of ungulate signs to estimate ungulate densities using both occupancy and distance sampling approaches. For five species of ungulates, the densities estimated from our sign survey (number of ungulate clusters km−2) were 1.46(0.68) chital Axis axis, 1.42(0.67) sambar Rusa unicolor, 1.01(0.44) gaur Bos gaurus, 0.74(0.39) wild pig Sus scrofa and 1.42(1.59) muntjac Muntiacus muntjak, and were similar to those generated from line transect sampling 2.16(0.76) chital, 2.47(0.56) sambar, 0.94(0.3) gaur, 1.09(0.37) wild pig and 4.03(0.83) muntjac), except for muntjac. The potential utility of this approach extends beyond sign surveys of forest ungulates to a wider range of animal monitoring contexts, including those based on scent-station surveys and camera trap surveys of elusive mammals.

Ancillary