A Lifeworld Critique of ‘Nature’ in the Taiwanese Curriculum: A perspective derived from Husserl and Merleau-Ponty
Article first published online: 9 SEP 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00629.x
© 2010 The Author. Educational Philosophy and Theory © 2010 Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia
Additional Information
How to Cite
HUNG, R. (2012), A Lifeworld Critique of ‘Nature’ in the Taiwanese Curriculum: A perspective derived from Husserl and Merleau-Ponty. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44: 1121–1132. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00629.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 21 NOV 2012
- Article first published online: 9 SEP 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- curriculum;
- Husserl;
- lifeworld;
- Merleau-Ponty;
- nature
Abstract
Learning about ‘nature’ has particular significance for education because the idea of nature is an important source of inspiring meaning-rich experience and creation. In order to have meaningful experiences in learning and living, this paper argues for a personal subject-related lifeworld approach to the learning of ‘nature’. Many authors claim that the lifeworld-led learning approach helps to enrich educational experience. However, there can be various interpretations of the lifeworld approach, as the concept of lifeworld is diversely understood. This paper proposes a personal, subject-related lifeworld approach from a Husserlian-Merleau-Pontian perspective. I suggest that it holds great potential for improving our current curriculum which suffers from meaning-impoverishment. This paper comprises the following parts: the elucidation of the lifeworld approach to learning, a demonstration of the flaws of current curricula by discussing and analysing the Taiwanese curriculum guidelines, and an exposition of the contribution of the Husserlian-Merleau-Pontian lifeworld approach towards improving our current curriculum.

1469-5812/asset/EPAT_centre.gif?v=1&s=783468c69cf5c7207da046cccc63e22a84c4c350)
