Reconsidering Constructivism in Qualitative Research
Article first published online: 23 JAN 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00720.x
© 2011 The Author. Educational Philosophy and Theory © 2011 Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia
Additional Information
How to Cite
LEE, C.-J. G. (2012), Reconsidering Constructivism in Qualitative Research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44: 403–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00720.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 16 MAY 2012
- Article first published online: 23 JAN 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- constructivism;
- constructionism;
- qualitative research;
- research paradigm
Abstract
This article examines constructivism, a paradigm in qualitative research that has been propagated by Egon Guba, Yvonna Lincoln, and Norman Denzin. A distinction is made between whether the basic presuppositions of constructivism are credible compared to those of a competing paradigm and whether constructivism's beliefs are internally consistent. The latter approach, i.e. whether constructivism is internally consistent, is the focus of this article. The issues singled out for discussion are concerned with the constructivist ontology and epistemology. This article shows that constructivism's paradigmatic beliefs are internally in tension.

1469-5812/asset/EPAT_centre.gif?v=1&s=783468c69cf5c7207da046cccc63e22a84c4c350)
