SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackermann RR, Cheverud JM (2000) Phenotypic covariance structure in tamarins (genus: Saguinus): a comparison of variation patterns using matrix correlation and common principal component analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 111, 489501.
  • Adams DC, Funk DJ (1997) Morphometric inferences on sibling species and sexual dimorphism in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles: multivariate applications of the thin-plate spline. Syst Biol 46, 180194.
  • Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (2004) Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Ital J Zool 71, 516.
  • Andresen PR, Bookstein FL, Conradsen K, Ersbøll B, Marsh J, Kreiborg S (2000) Surface-bounded growth modeling applied to human mandibles. IEEE Trans Med Imag 19, 10531063.
  • Atchley WR, Hall BK (1991) A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures. Biol Rev 66, 101157.
  • Barbujani G, Magagni A, Minch E, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1997) An apportionment of human DNA diversity (genetic variation/microsatellite loci/restriction polymorphisms/racial classification). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 45164519.
  • Barrientos G, Perez SI (2004) La expansión y dispersión de poblaciones del norte de Patagonia durante el Holoceno tardío: evidencia arqueológica y modelo explicativo. In Contra Viento y Marea. Arqueología de Patagonia (eds CivaleroMT, FernándezPM, GuráiebAG), pp. 179195. Buenos Aires: INAPL.
  • Barrientos G, Perez SI (2005) Was there a population replacement during the late middle Holocene in the Southeastern Pampas of Argentina? Archaeological evidence and its paleoecological basis. Quaternary Int 132, 95105.
  • Baylac M, Villemant C, Simbolotti G (2003) Combining geometric morphometrics with pattern recognition for the investigation of species complexes. Biol J Linn Soc 80, 8998.
  • Bernal V (2004) Morfometría geométrica aplicada al estudio de la variabilidad morfológica dental. In Libro de Resúmenes del XV Congreso Nacional de Arqueología Argentina, Río Cuarto (eds TamaginiM, MendoncaO), pp. 215216. Río Cuarto: Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto.
  • Bernal V (2005) Size and shape analysis of Human molars: comparing traditional and geometric morphometric techniques. Homo, in press.
  • Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 14, 239256.
  • Bookstein FL (1989) Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 11, 67585.
  • Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bookstein FL (1996a) Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bull Math Biol 58, 313365.
  • Bookstein FL (1996b) Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. In Advances in Morphometrics (eds MarcusLF, CortiM, LoyA, NaylorGJP, SliceDE), pp. 131152. Nato ASI Series, Series A: Life Science, Vol. 284. New York: Plenum.
  • Bookstein FL (1996c) Applying landmark methods to biological outline data. In Image Fusion and Shape Variability (eds MardiaKV, GillCA, DrydenIL), pp. 7987. Leeds: University of Leeds Press.
  • Bookstein FL (1996d) A standard formula for the uniform shape component in landmark data. In Advances in Morphometrics (eds MarcusLF, CortiM, LoyA, NaylorGJP, SliceDE), pp. 153168. Nato ASI Series, Series A: Life Science, Vol. 284. New York: Plenum.
  • Bookstein FL (1997) Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: localizing group differences in outline shape. Med Image Anal 1, 225243.
  • Bookstein FL (1998) A hundred years of morphometrics. Acta Zool Hung 44, 759.
  • Bookstein FL, Streissguth AP, Sampson PD, Connor PD, Barr HM (2002) Corpus callosum shape and neuropsychological deficits in adult males with heavy fetal alcohol exposure. Neuroimage 15, 233251.
  • Buikstra J, Ubelaker D (1994) Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series 44. Fayetteville: Arkansas Archaeological Survey.
  • Cheverud JM (1988) A comparison of genetic and phenotypic correlations. Evolution 42, 958968.
  • Devor EJ (1987) Transmission of human craniofacial dimensions. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 7, 95106.
  • Digby PGN, Kempton RA (1987) Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities. London: Chapman & Hall.
  • Dryden IL, Mardia KV (1998) Statistical Shape Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Foote M (1993) Contributions of individual taxa to overall morphological disparity. Paleobiology 19, 403419.
  • González-José R, Ramírez-Rozzi F, Sardi M, Martínez-Abadías N, Hernández M, Pucciarelli HM (2005) Functional-cranial approach to the influence of economic strategy on skull morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol 126, in press.
  • Goodall CR (1991) Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J R Stat Soc Serie B 53, 285339.
  • Gower JC (1971) Statistical methods of comparing different multivariate analyses of the same data. In Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences (eds HodsonFR, KendallDG, TautuP), pp. 138149. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Gower JC (1975) Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40, 3351.
  • Green WDK (1996) The thin-plate spline and images with curving features. In Image Fusion and Shape Variability (eds MardiaKV, GillCA, DrydenIL), pp. 7987. Leeds: University of Leeds Press.
  • Gunz P, Mitteroecker P, Bookstein FL (2004) Semi-landmarks in three dimensions. In Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology (ed. SliceDE), pp. 7398. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Hanken J, Hall B (1993) Mechanisms of skulldiversity and evolution. In The Skull, Vol. 3 (eds HankenJ, HallB), pp. 136. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hannihara T, Ishida H, Dodo Y (2003) Characterization of biological diversity through analysis of discrete cranial traits. Am J Phys Anthropol 121, 241251.
  • Howells WW (1969) The use of multivariate techniques in the study of skeletal populations. Am J Phys Anthropol 31, 311314.
  • Howells WW (1989) Skull Shapes and the Map. Craniometric Analyses in the Dispersion of Modern Homo. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 79. Cambridge: Harvard University.
  • Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Computational Graphics Statistics 5, 299314.
  • Jackson DA (1995) PROTEST: a Procrustean randomization test of community environment concordance. Écoscience 2, 297303.
  • Lewontin RC (1972) The apportionment of human diversity. Evol Biol 6, 381398.
  • Lieberman D (1996) How and why recenthumans grow thin skulls: experimental data on systemic cortical robusticity. Am J Phys Anthropol 101, 217236.
  • Lycett SJ, Collard M (2005) Due homoiologies impede phylogenetic analyses of the fossil hominids? An assessment based on extant papionin craniodental morphology. J Hum Evol 49, 618642.
  • Lynch JM, Wood CG, Luboga SA (1996) Geometric morphometrics in primatology: craniofacial variation in Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes. Folia Primatol 67, 1539.
  • MacLeod N (1999) Generalizing and extending the eigenshape method of shape space visualization and analysis. Paleobiology 25, 107138.
  • Marroig G, Cheverud JM (2001) A comparison of phenotypic variation and covariation patterns and the role of phylogeny, ecology, and ontogeny during cranial evolution of new world monkeys. Evolution 55, 25762600.
  • Monteiro LR, Abe AS (1999) Functional and historical determinants of shape in the scapula of xenarthran mammals: evolution of a complex morphological structure. J Morph 241, 251263.
  • Monteiro LR, Diniz-Filho JAF, Reis SF, Araújo ED (2002) Geometric estimates of heritability in biological shape. Evolution 56, 563572.
  • Monteiro-Filho ELA, Monteiro LR, Dos Reis SF (2002) Skull shape and size divergence in the genus Sotalia (Cetacea): a tridimensional morphometric analysis. J Mammal 83, 125134.
  • Navarro N, Zatarain X, Montuires S (2004) Effects of morphometric descriptor changes on statistical classification and morphospaces. Biol J Linn Soc 83, 243260.
  • Oxnard CE (1978) One biologist's view of morphometrics. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 9, 219241.
  • Peres-Neto PR, Jackson DA (2001) How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia 129, 169178.
  • Perez SI (2003) Morfometría de poblaciones humanas prehistóricas: una comparación de técnicas Tradicionales y Geométricas. Intersecciones en Antropología 4, 121129.
  • Perez SI (2005) El poblamiento holocenico del Sudeste de la Región Pampeana: un estudio de craneomorfometría geométrica. Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. Doctoral thesis.
  • Reis SF, Duarte LC, Monteiro LR, Von Zuben FJ (2002) Geographic variation in cranial morphology in Thrichomys apereoides (Rodentia: Echimyidae). I. Geometric descriptors of shape and multivariate analysis of geographic variation in shape. J Mammal 83, 125134.
  • Relethford JH, Lees FC (1982) The use of quantitative traits in the study of human population structure. Am J Phys Anthropol 25, 113132.
  • Relethford JH (1994) Craniometric variation among modern human populations. Am J Phys Anthropol 95, 5362.
  • Relethford JH, Harpending HC (1994) Craniometric variation, genetic theory, and modern human populations. Am J Phys Anthropol 96, 249270.
  • Reyment RA, Jöreskog KG (1993) Applied Factor Analysis in the Natural Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rohlf FJ (1990) Rotational fit (Procrustes) methods. In Proceedings Michigan Morphometrics Workshop (eds RohlfFJ, BooksteinFL), pp. 227236. Special publication no. 2, Museum of Zoology. Michigan: University of Michigan.
  • Rohlf FJ (1993) Relative warps analysis and an example of its application to mosquito wings. In Contributions to Morphometrics (eds MarcusLF, BelloE, García-ValdecasasA), pp. 132159. Madrid: Monografías del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales.
  • Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (1990) Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39, 4059.
  • Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF (1993) A revolution in morphometrics. Tree 8, 129132.
  • Rohlf FJ (1999) Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. J Class 16, 197223.
  • Rohlf FJ (2000) Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods. Am J Phys Anthropol 111, 463478.
  • Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL (2003) Computing the uniform component of shape variation. Syst Biol 52, 6669.
  • Rohlf FJ (2004) tps serie softwares. Available at http//life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
  • Roseman CC (2004) Detecting interregionally diversifying natural selection on modern human cranial form by using matched molecular and morphometric data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 1282412829.
  • Sampson PD, Bookstein FL, Sheehan H, Bolson EL (1996) Eigenshape analysis of left ventricular outlines from contrast ventriculograms. In Advances in Morphometrics (eds MarcusLF, CortiM, LoyA, NaylorGJP, SliceDE), pp. 131152. Nato ASI Series, Series A: Life Science, Vol. 284. New York: Plenum.
  • Sheets HD (2003) IMP-Integrated Morphometrics Package. Buffalo, NY: Department of Physics, Canisius College.
  • Sheets HD, Keonho K, Mitchell CE (2004) A combined landmark and outline-based approach to ontogenetic shape change in the Ordovician Trilobite Triarthrus becki. In Applications of Morphometrics in Paleontology and Biology (ed. Elewa, A), pp. 6781. New York: Springer.
  • Slice DE (2001) Landmark coordinates aligned by Procrustes analysis do not lie in Kendall's shape space. Syst Biol 50, 141149.
  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
  • Vogl C, Atchley WR, Cowley DE, Crenshaw DE, Murray JD, Pomp D (1993) The epigenetic influence of growth hormone on skeletal development. Growth Dev Aging 57, 163183.
  • Wood B, Lieberman DE (2001) Craniodental variation in Paranthropus boisei: a developmental and functional perspective. Am J Phys Anthropol 116, 1325.
  • Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL (2004) Geometric Morphometric for Biologists: a Primer. London: Academic Press.