Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.
A systematic meta-analytic review of evidence for the effectiveness of the ‘Fast ForWord’ language intervention program
Version of Record online: 15 OCT 2010
© 2010 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry © 2010 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Volume 52, Issue 3, pages 224–235, March 2011
How to Cite
Strong, G. K., Torgerson, C. J., Torgerson, D. and Hulme, C. (2011), A systematic meta-analytic review of evidence for the effectiveness of the ‘Fast ForWord’ language intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52: 224–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02329.x
Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/onlineopen#OnlineOpen_Terms
- Issue online: 5 FEB 2011
- Version of Record online: 15 OCT 2010
- Manuscript accepted 10 August 2010
- 2001). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134, 663–694. , , , , , , et al. (
- 2005). Effectiveness of computerised spelling training in children with language impairments: A comparison of modified and unmodified speech input. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 144–157. , , , & (
- 2006). Resistance of grammatical impairment to computerized comprehension training in children with specific and non-specific language impairments. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41, 19–40. , , & (
- 2009). A randomized field trial of the Fast ForWord language computer-based training program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 82–106. , , & (
- 1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 403–414. , & (
- 1999). Comprehensive assessment of spoken language. Circle Pines, MN: AGS. (
- 2008). Language intervention practices for school-age children with spoken language disorders: A systematic review. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, S110–S137. , & (
- 2005). Effects of computer-based intervention through acoustically modified speech (Fast ForWord) in severe mixed receptive-expressive language impairment: Outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 48, 715–729. , , , , , , , , & (
- 2008). The efficacy of Fast ForWord language intervention in school-age children with language impairment: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 97–119. , , , , , , , , & (
- 2008). A randomized, controlled study of computer-based intervention in middle school struggling readers. Brain and Language, 106, 83–97. , , , , & (
- 2009). Corrigendum to ‘A randomized, controlled study of computer-based intervention in middle school struggling readers’ [Brain and Language, 106 (2008) 83–97]. Brain and Language, 109, 49. , , , , & (
- 2001). Efficacy of Fast ForWord training on facilitating acquisition of reading skills by children with reading difficulties – a longitudinal study. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 75–96. , , & (
- 2004). The efficacy of treatment for children with speech/language delay/disorder: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 924–943. , , & (
- 2008). Does What Works Clearinghouse work? A brief review of Fast ForWord. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 32, 101–107. (
- 2008). Auditory processing deficits in children with reading and language impairments: Can they (and should they) be treated? Cognition, 107, 946–977. , , , & (
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
- 1998). Cortical plasticity, learning, and learning dysfunction. In B. Julesz, & I. Kavocs (Eds.), Maturational windows in adult cortical plasticity (pp. 247–272). New York: Addison-Wesley. , & (
- 1996). Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science, 271, 77–81. , , , , , & (
- 1998). Speech modification algorithms used for training language learning-impaired children. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 6, 257–268. , , , , , , , & (
- 2004). Phonological awareness intervention: Comparison of Fast ForWord, Earobics, and LiPS. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 147–157. , , & (
- 1989). Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 270–292. (
- 2004). Putting computerized instruction to the test: A randomized evaluation of a ‘scientifically based’ reading program. Economics of Education Review, 23, 323–338. , & (
- Scientific Learning Corporation. (1999). National field trial results: Results of Fast ForWord training for children with language and reading problems. Berkeley, CA: Scientific Learning Corporation.
- Scientific Learning Corporation. (2003). Scientifically based reading research and the Fast ForWord Products: Research implication for effective language and reading intervention. MAPS for Learning: Research Report, 7, 1–7.
- 2009). A meta-analytic investigation into the efficacy of Fast ForWord intervention on improving academic performance (Doctoral dissertation, Regent University, 2009). Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(12-A), 4633. (
- 1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and Language, 9, 182–198. (
- 2000). Experimental studies of language learning impairments: From research to remediation. In D.M.V. Bishop, & L.B. Leonard (Eds.), Speech and language impairments in children (pp.131–155). Hove: Psychology Press. (
- 1996). Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science, 271, 81–84. , , , , , , , , & (
- 1993). Neurobiological basis of speech: A case for the pre-eminence of temporal processing. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 682, 27–47. , , & (
- 1973). Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental aphasia. Nature, 241, 468–469. , & (
- 2003). A close look at the efficacy of Fast ForWord Language for children with academic weaknesses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 465–494. , & (
- 2009). An investigation of treatment scheduling for phonemic awareness with kindergartners who are at risk for reading difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 86–100. , , & (
- What Works Clearinghouse. (2006). Fast ForWord Language: English language learners. US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences (September).
- What Works Clearinghouse. (2007). Fast ForWord: Beginning reading. US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences (July).
- 2008). A comparison between computer and tabletop delivery of phonology therapy. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 346–363. , & (