Conflicts of interest statement: No conflicts declared.
Annual Research Review: Re-thinking the classification of autism spectrum disorders
Version of Record online: 4 APR 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry © 2012 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Special Issue: Annual Research Review issue
Volume 53, Issue 5, pages 490–509, May 2012
How to Cite
Lord, C. and Jones, R. M. (2012), Annual Research Review: Re-thinking the classification of autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53: 490–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02547.x
- Issue online: 4 APR 2012
- Version of Record online: 4 APR 2012
- Accepted for publication: 16 February 2012
- Autism spectrum disorders;
Background: The nosology of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is at a critical point in history as the field seeks to better define dimensions of social-communication deficits and restricted/repetitive behaviors on an individual level for both clinical and neurobiological purposes. These different dimensions also suggest an increasing need for quantitative measures that accurately map their differences, independent of developmental factors such as age, language level and IQ.
Method: Psychometric measures, clinical observation as well as genetic, neurobiological and physiological research from toddlers, children and adults with ASD are reviewed.
Results: The question of how to conceptualize ASDs along dimensions versus categories is discussed within the nosology of autism and the proposed changes to the DSM-5 and ICD-11. Differences across development are incorporated into the new classification frameworks.
Conclusions: It is crucial to balance the needs of clinical practice in ASD diagnostic systems, with neurobiologically based theories that address the associations between social-communication and restricted/repetitive dimensions in individuals. Clarifying terminology, improving description of the core features of ASD and other dimensions that interact with them and providing more valid and reliable ways to quantify them, both for research and clinical purposes, will move forward both practice and science.