Responses of neurones of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus to retinal illumination under photopic and scotopic conditions

Authors

  • Nicholas C. Aggelopoulos,

    Corresponding author
    1. Max-Planck Institute for Physiological and Clinical Research, W. G. Kerckhoff-Institute, 61231 Bad Nauheim
    • Corresponding author
      N. C. Aggelopoulos: Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK., Email: na10004@cam.ac.uk

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Hilmar Meissl

    1. Max-Planck Institute for Physiological and Clinical Research, W. G. Kerckhoff-Institute, 61231 Bad Nauheim
    2. Max-Planck-Institute for Brain Research, 60528 Frankfurt/M, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

  • We have examined the responses of neurones in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the rat to retinal illumination under photopic and scotopic conditions to identify the types of photoreceptor input to these nuclei.

  • The majority of visually responsive SCN neurones studied under dark adaptation received rod input (48 of 52, 92 %). The action spectrum conformed to the sensitivity of rhodopsin, with maximal sensitivity at around 505 nm.

  • When also studied under light adaptation, most visually responsive SCN neurones (20 out of 26, 77 %) responded to input from cones. The action spectra conformed to the spectrum of green cone opsin, with a main sensitivity peak at 510 nm and a significant secondary peak in the near-ultraviolet region of the spectrum.

  • The frequency of spontaneous activity was typically low under scotopic conditions (range 0.2-17.2 Hz) and higher under photopic conditions (range 0.6-40 Hz) for any given neurone. The most common response under scotopic conditions was an ‘on-excitation’ (32 of 48, 62.5 %), which changed under photopic conditions to an on-excitation followed by a more prominent off-inhibition.

  • Responses also changed due to endogenous ultradian cycles. Depending on the phase, responses could be altogether absent and even reverted from excitation to inhibition on opposite phases of a cycle. Ultradian cycles had a circadian dependence and were most common at around the light phase:dark phase (L:D) and D:L transition points of the circadian cycle.

  • Under photopic conditions, SCN neurones showed rhythmic electrical activity, with a preferred firing interval that had a value between 18 and 39 ms. This rhythmic activity was probably the result of endogenous subthreshold membrane potential oscillations.

  • In conclusion, light acting either via rod or cone pathways could have powerful, opposing actions on SCN neurones. These actions were state dependent. The presence of these neuronal responses suggests a role for rod and cone photoreceptors in SCN function.

Ancillary