Get access
Advertisement

Diet choice and capture success of wild dog (Lycaon pictus) in Hluhluwe-Umfolozi Park, South Africa

Authors

  • Sonja C. Krüger,

    1. Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Michael J. Lawes,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa
      All correspondence to: M. J. Lawes, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa. E-mail: LAWES@zoology.unp.ac.za
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Anthony H. Maddock

    1. KwaZulu-Natal Nature Conservation Service, P.O. Box 662, Pietermaritzburg, 3200, South Africa
    Search for more papers by this author

All correspondence to: M. J. Lawes, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa. E-mail: LAWES@zoology.unp.ac.za

Abstract

The small population of wild dog Lycaon pictus (n= 3 to 30) in Hluhluwe-Umfolozi Park (HUP) has declined since 1992. The survival of dogs in HUP is dependent on the reintroduction of more dogs; however, wild dog reintroduction programmes are fraught with problems and many have failed. In this paper the diet and capture success of the wild dog pack in the Hluhluwe Section, and the influence of dietary considerations on the success of the future reintroduction of wild dogs in this reserve, are investigated. Diet choice was determined from scat analysis, personal observation and field staff records. Eight ungulate prey species were identified from scat analysis: nyala Tragelaphus angasi and impala Aepyceros melampus were the most abundant ungulate species in HUP and accounted for 77% of the diet. On the whole, wild dogs included prey types in the diet consistent with a rate-maximizing foraging approach, although some prey were clearly taken opportunistically. The dogs preyed mostly on small- (> 25 kg) to medium-sized (40–90 kg) prey, while the young of large (< 90 kg) prey species or scavenged carcasses supplemented the diet during the dry season. Adult nyala were taken more frequently than other age classes, but wild dog preyed on juvenile impala more than expected. Female prey were taken more frequently than males but selection did not differ from prey population sex ratios. Prey capture success was similar to that of previous studies from both open and densely wooded habitats and the wild dogs successfully caught 48% of all prey species pursued. Results suggest that wild dogs are quite capable of adapting both their diet choice and foraging technique to the dense vegetation in HUP. We conclude that prey type, prey availability and habitat constraints on prey capture success, will not affect the reintroduction of more wild dogs into HUP.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary