• Please log in or register to access this feature.
You have free access to this content

Effects of aposematic coloration on predation risk in bumblebees? A comparison between differently coloured populations, with consideration of the ultraviolet

  1. R. J. Stelzer1,
  2. N. E. Raine1,2,
  3. K. D. Schmitt3,
  4. L. Chittka1

Article first published online: 26 MAY 2010

DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2010.00709.x

Issue

Journal of Zoology

Journal of Zoology

Volume 282, Issue 2, pages 75–83, October 2010

Additional Information

How to Cite

Stelzer, R. J., Raine, N. E., Schmitt, K. D. and Chittka, L. (2010), Effects of aposematic coloration on predation risk in bumblebees? A comparison between differently coloured populations, with consideration of the ultraviolet. Journal of Zoology, 282: 75–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2010.00709.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    Queen Mary University of London, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, London, UK

  2. 2

    School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK

  3. 3

    Institutstrasse7/2, Weinheim, Germany

*Correspondence Nigel E. Raine, School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK. Tel: +01784 443 539 Email: nigel.raine@rhul.ac.uk

  1. Editor: Nigel Bennett

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 26 MAY 2010
  2. Article first published online: 26 MAY 2010
  3. Received 24 September 2009; revised 16 March 2010; accepted 21 March 2010

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (534K)

References

  • Bowmaker, J.K., Heath, J.K., Wilkie, S.E. & Hunt, D.M. (1997). Visual pigments and oil droplets from six classes of photoreceptors in the retinas of birds. Vision Res. 37, 2183–2194.
  • Brower, L.P., Brower, J.V.Z. & Westcott, P.W. (1960). Experimental studies of mimicry. 5. the reactions of toads (Bufo terrestris) to bumblebees (Bombus americanorum) and their robberfly mimics (Mallophora bomboides), with a discussion of aggressive mimicry. Am. Nat. 94, 343–355.
  • Chittka, L. (2001). Camouflage of predatory crab spiders on flowers and the colour perception of bees (Aranida: Thomisidae/Hymenoptera: Apidae). Entomol. Gen. 25, 181–187.
  • Chittka, L., Ings, T.C. & Raine, N.E. (2004). Chance and adaptation in the evolution of island bumblebee behaviour. Popul. Ecol. 46, 243–251.
  • Chittka, L. & Kevan, P.G. (2005). Flower colour as advertisement. In Practical pollination biology: 157–196. Dafni, A., Kevan, P.G. & Husband, B.C. (Eds). Cambridge: Enviroquest Ltd.
  • Chittka, L. & Osorio, D. (2007). Cognitive dimensions of predator responses to imperfect mimicry? PLoS Biol. 5, e339.
  • Chittka, L., Skorupski, P. & Raine, N.E. (2009). Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 400–407.
  • Cuthill, I.C. & Bennett, A.T.D. (1993). Mimicry and the eye of the beholder. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 253, 203–204.
  • Endler, J.A. & Mielke, P.W. (2005). Comparing entire colour patterns as birds see them. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86, 405–431.
    Direct Link:
  • Estoup, A., Solignac, M., Cornuet, J.M., Goudet, J. & Scholl, A. (1996). Genetic differentiation of continental and island populations of Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Europe. Mol. Ecol. 5, 19–31.
    Direct Link:
  • Gilbert, F. (2005). The evolution of imperfect mimicry. In Insect evolutionary ecology: 231–288. Fellowes, M., Holloway, G. & Rolff, J. (Eds). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
  • Goulson, D. (2003). Bumblebees – behaviour and ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Goulson, D., Peat, J., Stout, J.C., Tucker, J., Darvill, B., Derwent, L.C. & Hughes, W.O.H. (2002). Can alloethism in workers of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, be explained in terms of foraging efficiency? Anim. Behav. 64, 123–130.
  • Hart, N.S. (2001). The visual ecology of avian photoreceptors. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 20, 675–703.
  • Hart, N.S. & Hunt, D.M. (2007). Avian visual pigments: characteristics, spectral tuning, and evolution. Am. Nat. 169, S7–S26.
  • Hart, N.S., Partridge, J.C., Cuthill, I.C. & Bennett, A.T.D. (2000). Visual pigments, oil droplets and cone photoreceptor distribution in two species of passerine bird: the blue tit (Parus caeruleus L.) and the blackbird (Turdus merula L.). J. Comp. Physiol. A 186, 375–387.
  • Hart, N.S. & Vorobyev, M. (2005). Modelling oil droplet absorption spectra and spectral sensitivities of bird cone photoreceptors. J. Comp. Physiol. A 191, 381–392.
  • Howse, P.E. & Allen, J.A. (1994). Satyric mimicry: the evolution of apparent imperfection. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 257, 111–114.
  • Ings, T.C., Raine, N.E. & Chittka, L. (2005a). Mating preference in the commercially imported bumblebee species Bombus terrestris in Britain (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Entomol. Gen. 28, 233–238.
  • Ings, T.C., Schikora, J. & Chittka, L. (2005b). Bumblebees, humble pollinators or assiduous invaders? A population comparison of foraging performance in Bombus terrestris. Oecologia 144, 508–516.
  • Kapan, D.D. (2001). Three-butterfly system provides a field test of Müllerian mimicry. Nature 409, 338–340.
  • Kevan, P., Giurfa, M. & Chittka, L. (1996). Why are there so many and so few white flowers? Trends Plant Sci. 1, 280–284.
  • Mallet, J. & Barton, N.H. (1989). Strong natural selection in a warning-color hybrid zone. Evolution 43, 421–431.
  • Mallet, J. & Joron, M. (1999). Evolution of diversity in warning color and mimicry: polymorphisms, shifting balance, and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30, 201–233.
  • Mappes, J., Marples, N. & Endler, J.A. (2005). The complex business of survival by aposematism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 598–603.
  • Mostler, G. (1935). Beobachtungen zur Frage der Wespenmimikry. Z. Morphol. Oekol. Tiere 29, 381–454.
  • Müller, C.B. (1994). Parasitoid induced digging behaviour in bumblebee workers. Anim. Behav. 48, 961–966.
  • Müller, C.B. & Schmid-Hempel, P. (1993). Exploitation of cold temperature as defense against parasitoids in bumblebees. Nature 363, 65–67.
  • Plowright, R.C. & Owen, R.E. (1980). The evolutionary significance of Bumble bee color patterns: a mimetic interpretation. Evolution 34, 622–637.
  • Prys-Jones, O.E. & Corbet, S.A. (1991). Bumblebees. The Richmond Publishing Co. Ltd, Slough, UK.
  • Rasmont, P., Coppée, A., Michez, D. & DeMeulemeester, T. (2008). An overview of the Bombus terrestris (L. 1758) subspecies (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 44, 243–250.
  • Ruxton, G.D., Sherratt, T.N. & Speed, M.P. (2004). Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Spaethe, J. & Weidenmüller, A. (2002). Size variation and foraging rate in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). Insectes Soc. 49, 142–146.
  • Velthuis, H.H.W. & Van Doorn, A. (2006). A century of advances in bumblebee domestication and the economic and environmental aspects of its commercialization for pollination. Apidologie 37, 421–451.
  • Verhoeven, G.J. & Schmitt, K.D. (2010). An attempt to push back frontiers – digital near-ultraviolet aerial archaeology. J. Archaeol. Sci. 37, 833–845.
  • Vogt, O. (1911). Studien über das Artproblem. 2. Mitteilung. Über das Variieren der Hummeln. 2. Teil. In Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin, Vol. 1911: 31–74. Friedländer & Sohn, Berlin.
  • Wallace, A.R. (1879). The protective colours of animals. In Science for all: 128–137. Brown, R. (Ed.). London: Cassell, Petter, Galpin.
  • Williams, P. (2007). The distribution of bumblebee colour patterns worldwide: possible significance for thermoregulation, crypsis, and warning mimicry. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 92, 97–118.
  • Wyszecki, G. & Stiles, W.S. (1982). Color science: concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae, Vol. 2. New York: Wiley.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (534K)