Foliar uptake and release of inorganic nitrogen compounds in Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies (L.) Karst.
Article first published online: 28 APR 2006
Volume 120, Issue 3, pages 407–416, March 1992
How to Cite
WILSON, E.J. (1992), Foliar uptake and release of inorganic nitrogen compounds in Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies (L.) Karst. New Phytologist, 120: 407–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01081.x
- Issue published online: 28 APR 2006
- Article first published online: 28 APR 2006
- (Received 23 April 1991; accepted 25 November 1991)
- Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine);
- Picea abies (Norway spruce);
- foliar uptake;
- ion exchange
Foliar uptake and release of inorganic nitrogen compounds were studied by immersing current-year shoots of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce [Pica abies (L.) Karst] in either NH4+- or NO3−-rain solutions at different N concentrations. The effects of N form, N concentration and tree species on ion influx and efflux were investigated.
Spruce shoots absorbed NH4+ from the external solution. Uptake apparently occurred by diffusion rather than by H+ or base cation exchange as commonly accepted, and increased linearly with NH4+ concentration in the external solution. In contrast, pine shoots released NH4+to the external solution. The different reactions of spruce and pine may reflect species differences in physical and chemical properties or differences in tissue N concentration. If the latter is the case, a tree's N status may determine whether the canopy acts as a source or sink for NH4+ influencing deposition rates to the needle surface. The results show that where NH4+ concentration on the needle surface exceeds 4 mg 1−1, foliar uptake may make a significant contribution to N status. In the absence of NH4+-base cation exchange, atmospheric inputs of NH4+to the canopy appear unlikely to be directly-responsible for the nutrient deficiencies typical of Dutch forest decline.
Neither spruce or pine shoots were able to utilize NO3− in the external solution and generally released NO3−. Adverse effects resulting from foliar accumulation of wet-deposited NO3− appear unlikely. However, higher NO3− concentrations and longer residence times than simulated in this experiment may result in foliar uptake of NO3− in the field.