SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

references

  • Albrecht C, Burgess T, Dell B, Lapeyrie F. 1994. Chitinase and peroxidase activities are induced in eucalyptus roots according to aggressiveness of Australian ectomycorrhizal strains of Pisolithus sp. New Phytologist 127: 217222.
  • Baar J, Ozinga WA, Kuyper THW. 1994. Spatial distribution of Laccaria bicolor genets reflected by sporocarps after removal of litter and humus layers in a Pinus sylvestris forest. Mycological Research 98: 726728.
  • Berjaud C, D'Auzac J. 1986. Isolernent et caractérisation des phosphatases d'un champignon ectomycorhizien typique: Pisolithus tinctorius. Effets de la carence en phosphate. Physiologie Végétale 24: 163172.
  • Bird IF, Cornelius MJ, Keys AJ. 1982. Affinity of RuBP carboxylases for carbon dioxide and inhibition of the enzymes by oxygen. Journal of Experimental Botany 33; 10041013.
  • Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248254.
  • Brasier CM, Rayner ADM. 1987. Whither terminology below the species level in the fungi? In: RaynerADM, BrasierCM, MooreD, eds. Evolutionary Biology of the Fungi. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 379388.
  • Courtecuisse R, Duhem B. 1994. Guide des champignons de France et d'Europe. Paris : Delachaux et Niestlé S.A. Lausanne (Switzerland), 424.
  • Dahlberg A. 1992. Somatic incompatibility – a tool to reveal spatiotemporal mycelial structures of ectomycorrhizal fungi. In: ReadDJ, LewisDH, FitterAH, AlexanderIJ, eds. Mycorrhizas in Ecosystems. Wallingford U.K. : C.A.B. International, 135141.
  • Dahlberg A, Stenlid J. 1990. Population structure and dynamics m Suillus bovinus as indicated by spatial distribution of fungal clones. New Phytologist 115: 487493.
  • Dahlberg A, Stenlid J. 1994. Size, distribution and biomass of genets in populations of Suillus bovinus (L.: Fr.) Roussel revealed by somatic incompatibility. New Phytologist 128: 225234.
  • Dupias G, Rey P. 1985. Document pour un zonage des régions phyto-écologiques. Centre d'ecologie des ressources renouve-lables, Toulouse. 39.
  • Fries N. 1987. Somatic incompatibility and field distribution of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Suillus luteus (Boletaceae). New Phytologist 107: 735739.
  • Fries N. 1994. Sexual incompatibility in Suillus variegatus. Mycological Research 98: 545546.
  • Fries N, Neuman W. 1990. Sexual incompatibility in Suillus luteus and Suillus granulatus. Mycological Research 94: 6470.
  • Fries N, Sun Y. 1992. The mating system of Suillus bovinus. Mycological Research 96: 237238.
  • Gardes M, White AJ, Fortin JA, Brans TD, Taylor JW. 1991. Identification of indigenous and introduced symbiotic fungi in ectomycorrhizae by amplification of nuclear and mitochondrial ribosomal DNA. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 180190.
  • Guehl JM, Mausain D, Falconnet G, Gruez J. 1990. Growth, carbon dioxide assimilation capacity and water-use efficiency of Pinus pinea L seedlings inoculated with different ecto-mycorrhizal fungi. Annales des Sciences Forestières 47; 91100.
  • Harley JL. 1989. The significance of mycorrhiza. Mycological Research 92: 129139.
  • Harley JL, Smith SE. 1983. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. London : Academic Press.
  • Henrion B, DI Battista C, Bouchard D, VairelLes D, Thompson BD, Le Tacon F, Martin F. 1994. Monitoring the persistence of Laccaria bicolor as an ectomycorrhizal symbionts of nursery-grown Douglas fir by PCR of the rDNA intergenic spacer. Molecular Ecology 3: 571580.
  • Holmer L, Stenlid J. 1991. Population structure and mating system in Marasmius androsaceus Fr. New Phytologist 119: 307314.
  • Jacobson KM, Miller OK. 1994. Postmeiotic mitosis in the basidia of Suillus granulatus: implications for population structure and dispersal biology. Mycologia 86: 511516.
  • Jacobson KM, Miller OK, Turner BJ. 1993. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers are superior to somatic incompatibility tests for discriminating genotypes in natural populations of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Suillus granulatus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90: 91599163.
  • Keller G. 1992. Isozymes in isolates of Suillus species from Pinus combra L. New Phytologist 120: 351358.
  • Korhonen K. 1978. Interfertility and clonal size in the Armil-lariella mellea complex. Karstenia 18: 3142.
  • Lamhamedi MS, Fortin JA, Kope HH, Kropp BR. 1990. Genetic variation in ectomycorrhiza formation by Pisolithus arhizus on Pinus pinaster and Pinus banksiana. New Phytologist 115: 689697.
  • Lawrence SH, Melnicik PJ, Weimer HE. 1960, A comparison of serum proteins and enzymes by starch-gel electrophoresis. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 105: 572575.
  • Le Tacon F. 1985. Les mycorhizes: une cooperation entre plante et champignon. La Recherche (n° 116) 16: 624632.
  • Loomis WD. 1974. Overcoming problems of phenolics and quinones in the isolation of plants enzymes and organelles. In: FleischerS, PackerL, eds. Methods in Enzymology, vol. 31. New York : Academic Press, 528544.
  • Martin JH. 1993. Spatial distribution among mycelial individuals of Lycoper don pyriforme occurring on decaying logs. Mycological Research 97: 11191125.
  • Marx DH. 1969. The influence of ectotrophic mycorrhizal fungi on the resistance of pine roots to pathogenic infections. I. Antagonism of mycorrhizal fungi to root pathogenic fungi and soil bacteria. Phytopathology 59: 153163.
  • Marx DH. 1972. Ectomycorrhizae as biological deterrent to pathogenic root infections. Annual Review of Phytopathology 10: 429454.
  • McAfee BJ, Fortin JA. 1986. Competitive interactions of ectomycorrhizal mycobionts under field conditions. Canadian Journal of Botany 64: 848852.
  • Molina R, Palmer JG. 1982. Isolation, maintenance, and pure culture manipulation of ectomycorrhizal fungi. In: N. C.Schenck, ed. Methods and Principles of Mycorrhizal Research. St Paul , Minnesota : The American Phytopathological Society, 115129.
  • Morizet J, Mingeau M. 1976. Influence des facteurs du milieu sur l'absorption hydrique (etude effectuée sur tomate décapité en exsudation). I. Facteurs mutritionnels. Annales Agronomiques 27: 183205.
  • Mousain D, Falconnet G, Gruez G, Chevalier G, Tillard P, Bousquet N, Plassard C, Cleyet-Marel JC. 1988. Controlled ectomycorrhizal development of mediterranean forest seedlings in the nursery. First results and prospects. In: SylviaDM, HungLL, GrahamJH, eds. Mycorrhizae in the Next Decade. Practical Applications and Research Priorities. Proceedings of the 7th North American Conference on Mycorrhizae, 3–8 May, Gainesville, FL, USA, 129.
  • Mousaim D, Plassard C, Argillier C, Sardin T, Leprince F, El Karkouri K, Arvieu JC, Cleyet-Marel JC. 1994. Stratégic d'amélioration de la qualité des plants forestiers et des reboisements méditerranéens par utilisation de la mycorhization contrôlée en pépinière. Acta Botanica Gallica 141: 571580.
  • Pasteur N, Pasteur G, Bonhomme F, Catalan J, Britton-Davidian J. 1987. Manuel technique de génétique par électrophorèse des protein es. Paris : Tec & Doc (Lavoisier).
  • Perrin R. 1985. L'aptitude des mycorhizes à protéger les plantes contre les maladies: panacée ou chimère Annales des Sciences forestiéres 42: 453469.
  • Perry DA, Molina R, Amaranthus MP. 1987. Mycorrhizae, mycorrhizospheres, and reforestation: current knowledge and research needs. Canadian Journal of Botany 17: 929940.
  • Rosado SCS, Kropp BR, Piché Y. 1994. Genetics of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis. II. Fungal variability and heritability of ectomycorrhizal traits. New Phytologist 126: 111117.
  • Sen R. 1990a. Intraspecific variation in two species of Suillus from Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forests based on somatic incompatibility and isozyme analyses. New Phytologist 114: 607616.
  • Sen R. 1990b. Isozymic identification of individual ectomycorrhiza synthesized between Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and isolates of two species of Suillus. New Phytologist 114: 617626.
  • Sen R, Hepper CM. 1986. Characterisation of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus spp.) by selective enzyme staining following polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 18: 2934.
  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. San Francisco : W. H. Freeman and Company.
  • Stenlid J. 1985. Population structure of Heterobasidion annosum as determined by somatic incompatibility, sexual incompatibility, and isozyme patterns. Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 22682273.
  • Thompson W, Rayner ADM. 1982. Spatial structure of a population of Tricholomopsis platyphylla in a woodland site. New Phyotologist 92: 103114.
  • Torres P., Honrubia M. 1994. Inoculation of containerized Pinus halepensis (Miller) seedlings with basidiospores of Pisolithus arhizus (Pers) Rauschert, Rhizopogon roseolus (Corda) Th M Fr and Sullius colinitus (Fr.) O. Kuntze. Annales des Sciences Forestières 51: 521528.
  • Uriel J. 1966. Méthodes d'électrophorèse dans des gels d'acrylamide-agarose. Bulletin de la Societé de Chimie Biologique 48: 969982.
  • Wendel JF, Weeden NF. 1990. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: SoltisDE, SoltisPS, eds. Isosymes in Plant Biology. London : Chapman and Hall, 545.
  • Wong KKY, Fortin A. 1990. Root colonisation and intraspecific mycobiont variation in ectomycorrhiza. Symbiosis 8: 197231.
  • Zhu H, Higginbotham KO, Dancik BP, Navratil S. 1988. Intraspecific genetic variability of isozymes in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Suillus tomentosus. Canadian Journal of Botany 66: 588594.