SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abbott RJ, Bretagnolle FC, Thebaud C. 1998. Evolution of a polymorphism for outcrossing rate in Senecio vulgaris: Influence of germination behavior. Evolution 52: 15931601.
  • Atwood SS. 1944. The behaviour of oppositional alleles in polyploids of Trifolium repens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 39: 6769.
  • Barrett SCH. 1988. The evolution, maintenance, and loss of self-incompatibility systems. In: J Lovett Doust, L Lovett Doust, eds.Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 98124.
  • Bateman AJ. 1952. Self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. I. Theory. Heredity 6: 285310.
  • Bennett JH. 1976. Expectations for inbreeding depression on self-fertilization of tetraploids. Biometrics 32: 449452.
  • Bertin R. 1993. Incidence of monoecy and dichogamy in relation to self-fertilization in angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 80: 557560.
  • Blanc G, Hokamp K, Wolfe K. 2003. A recent polyploidy superimposed on older large-scale duplications in the Arabidopsis genome. Genome Research 13: 137144.
  • Brennan A, Harris S, Hiscock S. 2003. The population genetics of sporophytic self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae): avoidance of mating constraints imposed by low S-allele number. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 358: 10471050.
  • Busbice TH, Wilsie CP. 1966. Inbreeding depression and heterosis in autotetraploids with application to Medicago sativa. Euphytica 15: 5267.
  • Chawla B, Bernatzky R, Liang W, Marcotrigiano M. 1997. Breakdown of self-incompatibility in tetraploid Lycopersicum peruvianum: inheritance and expression of S-related proteins. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95: 992996.
  • Cheung WY, Champagne G, Hubert N, Tusierum L. 1997. Conservation of S-locus for self-incompatibility in Brassica napus (L.) and Brassica oleracea (L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95: 7382.
  • Cook LM, Soltis PS. 2000. Mating systems of diploid and allotetraploid populations of Tragopogon (Asteraceae). II. Artificial populations. Heredity 84: 410415.
  • Crane MB, Lewis D. 1942. Genetical studies in pears III. Incompatibility and sterility. Journal of Genetics 43: 3143.
  • Darlington CD. 1928. Studies in Prunus, I and II. Journal of Genetics 19: 213264.
  • Darlington CD, Wylie AP. 1955. Chromosome atlas of flowering plants. London: George Allen & Unwin, 519.
  • Downey RK, Rakow GFW. 1987. Rapeseed and mustard. In: WR Fehr, ed. Principles of Cultivar Development. New York: MacMillan, 437486.
  • Felber F. 1991. Establishment of a tetraploid cytotype in a diploid population: effect of relative fitness of cytotypes. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 4: 194207.
  • Fulnecek J, Lim K, Leitch A, Kovarik A, Matyasek R. 2002. Evolution and structure of 5S rDNA loci in allotetraploid Nicotiana tabacum and its putative parental species. Heredity 88: 1925.
  • Hauck NR, Yamane H, Tao R, Iezzoni A. 2002. Self-compatibility and incompatibility in tetraploid sweet cherry (Prunus cerasus L.). Sexual Plant Reproduction 15: 3946.
  • Hecht A. 1944. Induced tetraploids of a self sterile Oenothera. Genetics 29: 6974.
  • Hedrick PW. 1987. Genetic load and the mating system in homosporous ferns. Evolution 41: 12821289.
  • Hiscock S. 2000. Genetic control of self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae): a successful colonizing species. Heredity 85: 1019.
  • Husband BC. 2004. The role of triploid hybrids in the evolutionary dynamics of mixed-ploidy populations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society (In press).
  • Husband BC, Schemske DW. 1997. The effect of inbreeding in diploid and tetraploid populations of Epibolium angustifolium (Onagraceae): implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Evolution 51: 737746.
  • Husband BC, Schemske DW. 2000. Ecological mechanisms of reproductive isolation between diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium. Journal of Ecology 88: 689701.
  • Johnson AG. 1971. Factors affecting the degree of self-incompatibility in inbred lines of Brussel sprouts. Euphytica 20: 561573.
  • Karle R, Parks CA, O'Leary MC, Boyle TH. 2002. Polyploidy-induced changes in the breeding behavior of Hatiora × graeseri (Cactaceae). Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 1227: 397403.
  • Lande R, Schemske DW. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 2440.
  • Lawrence MJ. 2000. Population genetics of the homomorphic self-incompatibility polymorphisms in flowering plants. Annals of Botany 85: 221226.
  • Lawrence WJ. 1930. Incompatibility in polyploids. Genetica 12: 269296.
  • Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. 1997. Polyploidy in angiosperms. Trends in Plant Science 2: 470476.
  • Levin DA. 1975. Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon 24: 3543.
  • Lewis D. 1942. The physiology of incompatibility in plants. I. The effect of temperature. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 131: 13.
  • Lewis D. 1943a. The incompatibility sieve for producing polyploids. Journal of Genetics 45: 261264.
  • Lewis D. 1943b. Physiology of incompatibility in plants. III. Autopolyploids. Journal of Genetics 45: 171185.
  • Lewis D. 1947. Competition and dominance of incompatibility alleles in diploid pollen. Heredity 1: 85108.
  • Lewis D. 1949. Incompatibility in flowering plants. Biological Review 24: 472496.
  • Lewis D. 1979. Sexual incompatibility in plants. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
  • Lewis D, Modlibowska I. 1942. Genetical studies in pears IV. Pollen-tube growth and incompatibility. Journal of Genetics 43: 211222.
  • Lundquist A. 1998. Disomic control of self-incompatibility in the tetraploid Ranunculus repens (Ranunculaceae). Hereditas 128: 181183.
  • Luu D-T, Qin X, Laublin G, Yang Q, Morse D, Cappadocia M. 2001. Rejection of S-heteroallelic pollen by a dual-specific S-RNase in Solanum chaocencse predicts a multimeric SI pollen component. Genetics 159: 329358.
  • Mable BK. 2004. Evolutionary genetics of self-incompatibility in a new ‘model’ plant: Arabidopsis lyrata. In: QCCronk, JWhitton, IEPTaylor, eds. Plant adaptation: molecular biology and ecology. Ottawa: NRC Research Press.
  • Masuyama S, Watano Y. 1990. Trends for inbreeding in polyploid pteridophytes. Plant Species Biology 5: 1318.
  • Miller JS, Venable DL. 2000. Polyploidy and the evolution of gender dimorphism in plants. Science 289: 23352338.
  • De Nettancourt D. 1977. Incompatibility in Angiosperms. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • De Nettancourt D, Saccardo F, Laneri U, Capaccio E. 1974. Self-compatibility in a spontaneous tetraploid of Lycopersicon peruvianum Mill. In: Proceedings of the Meeting on Mutation and Polyploidy, Bari, Italy, 2–10 October 1972. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency, 7784.
  • Otto SP, Whitton J. 2000. Polyploidy: incidence and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 34: 401437.
  • Pandey KK. 1968. Colchicine-induced changes in the self-incompatibility behaviour of Nicotiana. Genetica 39: 257271.
  • Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 467501.
  • Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 589639.
  • Rodríguez DJ. 1996. A model for the establishment of polyploidy in plants. American Naturalist 147: 3346.
  • Ronfort J. 1999. The mutation load under tetrasomic inheritance and its consequences for the evolution of the selfing rate in autotetraploid species. Genetical Research 74: 3142.
  • Skalicka K, Lim KY, Matyasek R, Koukalova B, Leitch AR, Kovarik A. 2003. Rapid evolution of parental rDNA in a synthetic tobacco allotetraploid line. American Journal of Botany 90: 988996.
  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry. New York: W.H. Freeman.
  • Soltis DE, Soltis PS. 1999. Polyploidy: recurrent formation and genome evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 348352.
  • Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Chase MW, Mort ME, Albach DC, Zanis M, Savolainen V, Hahn WH, Hoot SB, Fay MF, Axtell M, Swensen SM, Prince LM, Kress WR, Nixon KC, Farris JS. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 381461.
  • Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2000. The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 70517057.
  • Stebbins GL. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. New York, London: Columbia University Press, 643.
  • Stone JL. 2002. Molecular mechanisms underlying the breakdown of gametophytic self-incompatibility. Quarterly Review of Biology 77: 1732.
  • Thompson JD, Lumaret R. 1992. The evolutionary dynamics of polyploidy plants: origins, establishment and persistence. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7: 302307.
  • Weller SG, Sakai AK. 1999. Using phylogenetic approaches for the analysis of plant breeding system evolution. Annual Review of Ecological Systematics 30: 167199.
  • Weller SG, Donoghue MJ, Charlesworth D. 1995. The evolution of self-incompatibility in flowering plants: A phylogenetic approach. In: PC Hoch, AG Stephenson, eds. Experimental and Molecular Approaches to Plant Biosystematics. Missouri: Missouri Botanical Garden, 355382.
  • Wendel JF, Schnabel A, Seelanan T. 1995. Bidirectional interlocus concerted evolution following allopolyploid speciation in cotton (Gossypium). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92: 280284.
  • Williams W. 1951. Genetics of incompatibility in alsike clover, Trifolium hybridum. Heredity 5: 5173.
  • Yates F. 1934. Contingency tables involving small numbers and the χ2 test. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1: 217235.
  • Young AG, Millar C, Gregory E, Langston A. 2000. Sporophytic self-incompatibility in diploid and tetraploid races of Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides (Asteraceae). Australian Journal of Botany 48: 667672.