• Eucalyptus maculata;
  • Casuarina cunninghamiana;
  • 15NH4+;
  • 15NO3;
  • Frankia;
  • Pisolithus sp.;
  • common ectomycorrhizal networks (CMNs);
  • two-way N transfer


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References
  • • 
    Two-way N transfers mediated by Pisolithus sp. were examined by excluding root contact and supplying 15NH4+ or 15NO3 to 6-month-old Eucalyptus maculata or Casuarina cunninghamiana grown in two-chambered-pots separated by 37 m screens.
  • • 
    Mycorrhizal colonization was 35% in Eucalyptus and 66% in Casuarina (c. 29% N2-fixation). Using an environmental scanning electron microscope, living hyphae were observed to interconnect Eucalyptus and Casuarina. Biomass and N accumulation was greatest in nodulated mycorrhizal Casuarina/mycorrhizal Eucalyptus pairs, less in nonnodulated mycorrhizal Casuarina/mycorrhizal Eucalyptus pairs, and least in nonnodulated nonmycorrhizal Casuarina/nonmycorrhizal Eucalyptus pairs.
  • • 
    In nonnodulated mycorrhizal pairs, N transfers to Eucalyptus or to Casuarina were similar (2.4–4.1 mg per plant in either direction) and were 2.6–4.0 times greater than in nonnodulated nonmycorrhizal pairs. In nodulated mycorrhizal pairs, N transfers were greater to Eucalyptus (5–7 times) and to Casuarina (12–18 times) than in nonnodulated mycorrhizal pairs. Net transfer to Eucalyptus or to Casuarina was low in both nonnodulated nonmycorrhizal (< 0.7 mg per plant) and nonnodulated mycorrhizal pairs (< 1.1 mg per plant). In nodulated mycorrhizal pairs, net transfer to Casuarina was 26.0 mg per plant.
  • • 
    The amount and direction of two-way mycorrhiza-mediated N transfer was increased by the presence of Pisolithus sp. and Frankia, resulting in a net N transfer from low-N-demanding Eucalyptus to high-N-demanding Casuarina.


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

Plants with the same fungal species can be linked to one another below-ground by a common mycorrhizal network (CMN) in either intra- or interspecific combinations (Newman, 1988; Newman et al., 1994). CMNs provide pathways for movement of nutrients such as carbon, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus. Unidirectional transfer of NH4+ or NO3 has been observed for arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) CMNs (Bethlenfalvay et al., 1991; Frey & Schuepp, 1993; Johansen & Jensen, 1996), and of NH4+ for ectomycorrhizal (EM) CMNs (Arnebrant et al., 1993; Ekblad & Huss-Danell, 1995). Such one-way N transfer between plants may occur directly through fungal hyphae in a CMN without entering the soil solution. Differences in N concentration between N-rich donors and N-poor receivers may drive N transfer (Bethlenfalvay et al., 1991; Frey & Schuepp, 1993). However, these studies did not determine net N transfer because only one-way N transfer was measured.

In Australia, the native trees, Casuarina and Eucalyptus, grow as pure or mixed stands and are mycorrhizal (Attiwill & Adams, 1996). N2-fixing Casuarina can contribute N to soil and indirectly to other adjacent nonN2-fixing plants including Eucalyptus (Subbarao & Rodriguez-Barrueco, 1995; Attiwill & Adams, 1996). However, the role of mycorrhizas in one- or two-way N transfer between these two species has not been investigated. Mycorrhiza-mediated N transfer may be determined by interactions among plant roots, mycorrhizal fungi, N2 fixation, and plant N requirements. We traced N movement between plants using 15NH4+ or 15NO3 and asked four questions: first, do mycorrhizas mediate N transfer from Casuarina to Eucalyptus? Second, do mycorrhizas mediate N transfer from Eucalyptus to Casuarina? Third, is N transfer altered by mycorrhization or by N2 fixation? Fourth, what is the amount and direction of net N transfer?

Materials and Methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

Experimental pots and plant growth conditions

Experimental pots were 5-l plastic boxes (300 × 12 × 150 cm). Boxes were separated by two perforated Perspex plates (0.25 cm wide) to form a 5 mm air gap between the two chambers. A similar system was used by Johansen & Jensen (1996). The purpose of the air gap was to prevent water and solute movement between the two chambers. Each perforated plate had 312 holes (6 mm in diameter). The Perspex plates had no holes in the bottom 10 mm to prevent water flow at the bottom of the chambers. On one side of the plates, there was a 37 m nylon mesh that allowed only hyphal connections. The structure of the experimental boxes resembled a multiple layer sandwich.

Each chamber contained 3 kg potting mix (sand: peat = 2 : 1, v/v, pH 6.5). Each m3 of potting mix contained 8.3 kg of stock fertilizer mix (1.5 kg cattle blood and bone powders, 0.3 kg K2SO4, 1.5 kg superphosphate, 2.5 kg dolomite, 1.5 kg hydrated lime, and 1.0 kg gypsum). In addition to the air gap, to further minimize water movement through nylon meshes within and between the two chambers, 0.5% (w/w) high water holding capacity crystals (RainSaver®, Hortex Australia Pty. Ltd, Seven Hills, NSW, Australia) were mixed with the potting mix. To prevent transformation of NH4+ to NO3, a nitrification inhibitor, N-serve [2-chloro-6-(trichloromethyl) pyridine, Sigma-Aldrich Pty Ltd, Castle Hills, NSW, Australia] was applied. N-serve was dissolved in ethanol, diluted in distilled water and mixed with potting mix (5 mg kg−1 potting mix). N-serve retards the first step in nitrification of NH4+ to hydroxylamine by Nitrosomonas sp. (Slangen & Kerkhoff, 1984) and has little effect on other soil microorganisms when < 10 mg kg−1 soil is used (Laskowski et al., 1975). The experimental pot contained one Casuarina seedling in one chamber and one Eucalyptus seedling in another chamber. Plants were grown for 6 months (September 1998 to February 1999) in a temperature-controlled glasshouse (28/23°C, day/night) located at the St Lucia campus of the University of Queensland. Plants were watered weekly with 5.0 ml nutrient solution (Brundrett et al., 1996) containing 2.0 mmol (14NH4)2SO4 or 4.0 mmol K14NO3.

Experimental design

There were three treatments: first, nonnodulated nonmycorrhizal (NodMyc); second, nonnodulated mycorrhizal (NodMyc+); and third, nodulated mycorrhizal (Nod+Myc+) (Table 1). The NodMyc treatment was used to measure N transfer through the growth medium (soil pathway). The NodMyc+ treatment was used to determine effects of mycorrhizas on N transfer. The Nod+Myc+ treatment was used to study effects of both mycorrhization and N2 fixation on N transfer.

Table 1.  Experimental design for two-way N transfer between Casuarina and Eucalyptus seedlings grown in two-chambered pots. The mycorrhizal fungus was Pisolithus sp. and the N2-fixing symbiont was Frankia
Pair nameN donorN receiverTreatment status
  1. 15N was supplied to the growth medium of donor plant side. Myc or M, mycorrhizal status; Nod or F, nodulation status; C, Casuarina; E, Eucalyptus.

NonnodulatedCasuarinaEucalyptusCM–F–[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]EM–
nonmycorrhizal pairsEucalyptusCasuarinaEM–[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]CM–F–
NonnodulatedCasuarinaEucalyptus+CM+F–[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]EM+
mycorrhizal pairsEucalyptusCasuarina+EM+[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]CM+F–
NodulatedCasuarinaEucalyptus++CM+F+[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]EM+
mycorrhizal pairsEucalyptusCasuarina++EM+[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]CM+F+

When plants were 5 months old, 6 mg 15N [(15NH4)2SO4, c. 98.8 atom percentage 15N or K15NO3, c. 97.6 atom percentage 15N], was dissolved in 200 ml deionized water and added to the growth media of the donor side for a 4-wk-period without further N supplement. No N was supplied to the receiver plants during this period. Either Casuarina or Eucalyptus was the donor. Thus net N transfer could be calculated as the difference between 15N translocation from Casuarina to Eucalyptus and from Eucalyptus to Casuarina.

Production of aseptic ectomycorrhizal seedlings

A sporocarp of Pisolithus sp. was collected by JW Cairney in 1988 at North Head, New South Wales, Australia. The sporocarp isolate was maintained by PA McGee and WG Allaway, University of Sydney, Australia. The isolate was cultured on nutrient agar (Ahmad & Hellebust, 1991). N was supplied as (14NH4)2SO4 or as K14NO3. Seeds of Casuarina cunninghamiana Miq. (river she-oak) and Eucalyptus maculata Hook (spotted gum) were purchased from the Queensland Institute of Forestry, Australia. Seeds were surface sterilized (70% ethanol, 30 s; 15% H2O2, 5 min), rinsed with sterile water, and germinated on the media of Ahmad & Hellebust (1991) (minus biotin and vitamin B12). Axenically germinated seeds were placed on agar plates with or without Pisolithus sp. in a growth chamber (23/18°C, day/night) (Brundrett et al., 1996). Mycorrhizal formation occurred after 6 wk.

Germinated Casuarina seeds were also placed on sterilized agar plates with or without Frankia (two strains UGL020604 and UGL020605, from CT Wheeler, University of Glasgow, UK). Plates were incubated in a growth chamber (23/18°C, day/night); nodules formed after 6 wk. To make Frankia inoculums, c. 5-mm diameter fresh Frankia nodules were surface sterilized (70% ethanol, 30 s), rinsed, ground, filtered and diluted with sterile water. To produce nodulated Casuarina seedlings, seedlings roots were dipped in fresh diluted Frankia suspension for 20 min before transplanting into plastic bags (90 cm × 150 cm). Five ml of this suspension was added to the growth media near tap roots at wk 1 and 3 after transplanting. In the Nod treatment, seedlings of Casuarina and Eucalyptus seedlings received boiled nodule suspension. In the glasshouse, seedlings were grown for 2 months in plastic bags, then transplanted into experimental pots and grown for 4 months until harvest.

Plant harvest

Plants were harvested 4 wk after 15N addition to the growth media on the N donor side. Shoots, roots and nodules were oven-dried, weighed, grounded in a ball-mill (Retsch GmbH & Co. KG, 5657 Haan 1, Germany) and analyzed for total N and 15N. Fresh Casuarina needles were collected before 15N treatment for estimation of N2 fixation. Subsamples of fresh roots were preserved in 50% ethanol for determination of mycorrhizal colonization (Brundrett et al., 1996). Using an ElectroScan E3 environmental scanning electron microscope (Electro-Scan Corp., Wilmington, MA, USA), living fungal hyphae and CMN formation were observed on mesh between the two chambers of experimental pots for mycorrhizal Casuarina/Eucalyptus and Eucalyptus/Casuarina treatments (Fig. 1; He, 2002).


Figure 1. Environmental scanning electron micrographs of hyphae of Pisolithus sp. (a) hyphae ramified on 37 m nylon mesh (× 225); (b) hyphae crossing mesh (× 395); (c) higher magnification showing hyphae within a hole of mesh (× 650).

Download figure to PowerPoint

Nitrogen assays, N2 fixation and N transfer calculations

Samples were analyzed for 15N (Automated 15N : 13C analyser-mass spectrometers, Europa Scientific, Crewe, UK). N2 fixation was expressed as specific nodule activity (g tissue N mg−1 d. wt nodule). Percent plant nitrogen derived from fixation (% Nfixed) was calculated (Knowles & Blackburn, 1993; Unkovich et al., 2001):

  • % Nfixed = (δ15Nnonfixing plant − δ15Nfixing plant)/ (δ15Nnonfixing plant − B) × 100(Eqn 1)

where ‘B’ is the δ15N value of nodulated N2-fixing plants grown without added N.

N transfer was expressed as percentage Ntransfer (eqn 2), amount of N transferred (mg per plant, eqn 4) and percentage NDFT (N in the N receiver derived from transfer, eqn 5) (Johansen & Jensen, 1996):

  • % Ntransfer = 15N contentreceiver × 100/ (15N contentreceiver + 15N contentdonor)(Eqn 2)


  • 15N contentplant = atom %15N excessplant × total Nplant/ atom % 15N excesslabeled N(Eqn 3)

Amount of N transferred (mg per plant):

  • Ntransfer = % Ntransfer × total Ndonor/(100 − % Ntransfer)(Eqn 4)

% of N in receiver derived from transfer (% NDFT):

  • % NDFT = Ntransfer × 100/total Nreceiver(Eqn 5)

% NDFT values were also calculated as follows (Tomm et al., 1994):

  • % NDFTdonor = (atom %15N excessreceiver/ atom %15N excessdonor) × 100(Eqn 6)

Statistical analyses

Each treatment had nine replicates. Data were arc-sine transformed if zero values existed, then analyzed by anova procedures for N donor and N receiver separately. Differences in means were compared (Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference Method) and were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 or 0.01 level (Sokal & Rohlf, 1995).


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

Biological nitrogen fixation in Casuarina plants

Shoot δ15N values in Nod+Myc+Casuarina seedlings were similar when either (NH4)2SO4 or KNO3 was the N-source (Table 2). There were no differences in percent N2 fixation and specific nodule activity for either N source. Casuarina provided more than a quarter of its total N needs by N2 fixation (Table 2).

Table 2.  Effect of N source on N2 fixation by 5-month-old mycorrhizal Casuarina seedlings grown in two-chambered pots
N-sourceShoot δ15N (‰)Nfixed (%)Specific Nodule Activity (µg N mg−1 d. wt nodule)
  1. Data are means ± SE (n = 9). For each parameter, values followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P ≤ 0.05). Percent Nfixed is calculated by eqn 1. Shoot δ15N value of Casuarina grown without added N was − 6.44 ± 0.78.

(NH4)2SO4−0.33 ± 0.19a27.0 ± 2.9a22.2 ± 0.4a
KNO3−0.84 ± 0.11a28.7 ± 1.6a22.1 ± 2.1a

Formation of mycorrhizas and common mycorrhizal networks

In the nonmycorrhizal treatments, colonization was < 5% (Table 3). No hyphae were observed on the nylon mesh and very few mycelia were seen in the growth media. Ectomycorrhizas were formed on mycorrhizal roots in mycorrhizal treatments. Colonization differed significantly between Myc and Myc+ plants in both species. Eucalyptus had nearly double the colonization of Casuarina. Both NodMyc+ and Nod+Myc+Casuarina had similar infection levels (Table 3). Observations with an environmental scanning electron microscope showed that living fungal mycelia ramified over nylon mesh (Fig. 1a), penetrated the mesh between chambers and established links between roots of the two plants in mycorrhizal treatments (Fig. 1b,c) in mycorrhizal treatments. No roots crossing the nylon meshes were observed in any treatment.

Table 3.  Mycorrhizal colonization and percentage N of Casuarina and Eucalyptus seedlings grown in two-chambered pots
N-sourceTreatmentColonization (%)N (%)
  1. Plants were fertilized with (14NH4)2SO4 or K14NO3 for 5 months, and then with (15NH4)2SO4 or K15NO3 (N donor only) for 1 month before harvest. Data are means ± SE (n = 18). For each parameter, values followed by different letters designate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) between treatments for a given N form and a given species within columns (a, b, c), and between species for a given N form and a given treatment within rows (x, y, z), respectively. Myc, mycorrhizal status; Nod, nodulation status.

(15NH4)2SO4 5 ± 1(b, x) 5 ± 1(b, x)0.85 ± 0.01(c, x)0.83 ± 0.04(b, x)
+34 ± 4(a, y)62 ± 3(a, x)1.06 ± 0.06(b, x)0.90 ± 0.02(ab, x)
++34 ± 7(a, y)66 ± 3(a, x)1.69 ± 0.06(a, x)0.96 ± 0.03(a, y)
K15NO3 2 ± 1(b, x) 3 ± 1(b, x)0.92 ± 0.03(c, x)0.82 ± 0.05(b, x)
+33 ± 4(a, y)63 ± 4(a, x)1.02 ± 0.05(b, x)0.91 ± 0.05(ab, x)
++35 ± 5(a, y)64 ± 6(a, x)1.66 ± 0.10(a, x)0.96 ± 0.06(a, y)

Biomass production

Biomass production of Casuarina and Eucalyptus followed the following pattern: Nod+Myc+ treatment (1.4–1.8 times) > NodMyc+ treatment (1.2–1.4 times) > NodMyc treatment (Fig. 2). Biomass production was not affected by whether Casuarina or Eucalyptus served as N donor or N receiver (Fig. 2), so donor and receiver biomass data were combined.


Figure 2. Biomass of Casuarina (solid bars) and Eucalyptus (open bars) seedlings as affected by mycorrhizas, nodulation and N source. Plants were fertilized with 14N for 5 months and 15N (N donor only) for 1 month before harvest. Since the identity of the donor plant did not affect biomass, data (means ± SE, n = 18) were combined. Values followed by the same letter for each plant species and each treatment are not significantly different (P ≤ 0.05). Abbreviations: C, Casuarina; E, Eucalyptus; M, mycorrhizal status; F, nodulation status.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Plant N concentration and N content

Nod+Myc+Casuarina had significantly greater %N than either NodMyc+Casuarina or NodMycCasuarina (Table 3). There were no statistical differences in N concentrations between Myc and Myc+Eucalyptus, if Eucalyptus was paired with NodMyc+Casuarina. When Myc+Eucalyptus was paired with Nod+Myc+Casuarina, plant %N was greater than MycEucalyptus (Table 3). N content in Casuarina and Eucalyptus was greater in the Nod+Myc+ treatment (3–4 times, Casuarina; 1.5–2 times, Eucalyptus) than in the NodMyc+ treatment (1.5 times, Casuarina; 1.2–1.5 times, Eucalyptus) or in the NodMyc treatment (Fig. 3). N content was not affected by N source or the genus of donor and receiver. Biomass production increased with tissue N content in both Casuarina and Eucalyptus (Fig. 4, r2 ranged from 0.83 to 0.99). NodMyc+ plants had significantly higher biomass and N content than NodMyc controls. The greatest biomass and N content was found in the combination – Nod+Myc+Casuarina and Myc+Eucalyptus.


Figure 3. Nitrogen content of Casuarina and Eucalyptus seedlings (solid bars for donors and open bars for receivers) as affected by mycorrhizas, nodulation, N source, and identity of the N-donor or N-receiver. Plants were fertilized with 14N for 5 months and with 15N (N donor only) for 1 month before harvest. Data are means ± SE (n = 9). Values followed by the same letter for each plant species and each treatment are not significantly different (P ≤ 0.05). Abbreviations: C, Casuarina; E, Eucalyptus; M, mycorrhizal status; F, nodulation status.

Download figure to PowerPoint


Figure 4. Relationship between biomass and N content of Casuarina (circles) and Eucalyptus (triangles) seedlings. The 15N-donors are indicated by solid symbols, 15N-receivers by open symbols. Data are means ± SE (n = 9). Regressions are shown for Casuarina (solid lines) and for Eucalyptus (dashed lines). Abbreviations: C, Casuarina; E, Eucalyptus; M, mycorrhizal status; F, nodulation status.

Download figure to PowerPoint

15N atom % excess and 15N content

As expected, 15N atom percentage excess was much greater in N donors than in N receivers, regardless of mycorrhizal status and N source (Table 4). For both Casuarina and Eucalyptus donors, whether 15NH4+ or 15NO3 was the N source, plants in the NodMyc treatment had significantly greater 15N atom percentage excess, followed by plants with NodMyc+ treatment, then by plants with Nod+Myc+ treatment. By contrast, in the NodMyc and NodMyc+ treatments, receivers had similar values for 15N atom % excess. When Myc+Eucalyptus was grown with Nod+Myc+Casuarina, both plant species had significantly higher 15N atom % excess than their NodMyc counterparts. In addition, 15N atom % excess was generally higher when 15NO3 was the N source.

Table 4. 15N atom % excess and total 15N content of Casuarina and Eucalyptus seedlings grown in two-chambered pots. Plants were fertilized with (14NH4)2SO4 or K14NO3 for 5 months, and then with (15NH4)2SO4 or K15NO3 (N donor only) for 1 month before harvest
N-sourceCodesN donor15N (atom % excess)15N (mg per plant)N receiver15N (atom % excess)15N (mg per plant)
  1. Data are means ± SE (n = 9). For each parameter, values followed by different letters designate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) between treatments for a given N form and a given species within columns (a, b, c), and between species for a given N form and a given treatment within rows (x, y, z), respectively. C, Casuarina; E, Eucalyptus; M, mycorrhizal status; F, nodulation status.

(15NH4)2SO4CM–F–[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]EM–Casuarina0.475 ± 0.006(a, x)1.041 ± 0.048(c, x)Eucalyptus0.004 ± 0(b, y)0.006 ± 0(c, y)
EM–[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]CM–F–Eucalyptus0.846 ± 0.054(a, x)1.771 ± 0.076(a, x)Casuarina0.003 ± 0(b, y)0.005 ± 0(c, y)
CM+F–[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]EM+Casuarina0.387 ± 0.006(b, x)1.398 ± 0.098(b, x)Eucalyptus0.008 ± 0(b, y)0.018 ± 0.001(b, y)
EM+[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]CM+F–Eucalyptus0.479 ± 0.002(b, x)1.273 ± 0.073(b, x)Casuarina0.004 ± 0(b, y)0.011 ± 0.001(b, y)
CM+F+[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]EM+Casuarina0.243 ± 0.002(c, x)1.710 ± 0.069(a, x)Eucalyptus0.014 ± 0.001(a, y)0.042 ± 0.003(a, y)
EM+[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]CM+F+Eucalyptus0.276 ± 0.021(c, x)0.945 ± 0.121(c, x)Casuarina0.019 ± 0.004(a, y)0.123 ± 0.025(a, y)
K15NO3CM–F–[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]EM–Casuarina0.995 ± 0.045(a, x)2.205 ± 0.115(a, x)Eucalyptus0.011 ± 0.002(b, y)0.014 ± 0.001(c, y)
EM–[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]CM–F–Eucalyptus1.037 ± 0.072(a, x)2.124 ± 0.187(a, x)Casuarina0.010 ± 0.001(b, y)0.015 ± 0.001(c, y)
CM+F–[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]EM+Casuarina0.551 ± 0.025(b, x)1.733 ± 0.068(b, x)Eucalyptus0.012 ± 0.001(b, y)0.025 ± 0.002(b, y)
EM+[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]CM+F–Eucalyptus0.701 ± 0.063(b, x)1.818 ± 0.007(b, x)Casuarina0.015 ± 0.001(b, y)0.036 ± 0(b, y)
CM+F+[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]EM+Casuarina0.281 ± 0.038(c, x)1.918 ± 0.371(b, x)Eucalyptus0.025 ± 0.002(a, y)0.068 ± 0.010(a, y)
EM+[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]CM+F+Eucalyptus0.496 ± 0.047(c, x)1.667 ± 0.021(b, x)Casuarina0.035 ± 0.002(a, y)0.243 ± 0.011(a, y)

N donors had significantly greater 15N content than N receivers. As a donor when 15NH4+ as the N-source, Casuarina showed a different pattern of 15N accumulation from Eucalyptus (Table 4). All donor and receiver plants fertilized with 15NH4+ had lower 15N content than plants fertilized with 15NO3 (Table 4). When 15NH4+ was supplied and either plant species was the N donor, 15N content in Casuarina (donor or receiver) was lowest in NodMyc treatment, greater in NodMyc+ treatment and greatest in Nod+Myc+ treatment. When 15NH4+ was supplied and either plant species was the N donor, 15N content decreased in Eucalyptus donor from NodMyc to NodMyc+, then to Nod+Myc+ plants, while 15N content increased in Eucalyptus receiver from NodMyc to NodMyc+, then to Nod+Myc+ plants. By contrast, when 15NO3 was supplied and either plant species was the N donor, 15N accumulation was similar in Nod+Myc+ and NodMyc+Casuarina and Eucalyptus donors, but the greatest 15N accumulation was displayed in NodMycCasuarina and Eucalyptus donors. On the other hand, for both Casuarina and Eucalyptus N receiver, 15N content consistently increased as follows: Nod+Myc+ > NodMyc+ > NodMyc plants, when either 15NH4+ or 15NO3 was supplied (Table 4).

Nitrogen transfer between Casuarina and Eucalyptus

In general, N transfer with either (15NH4)2SO4 or K15NO3 as the tracing N source was bi-directional in all Casuarina/Eucalyptus pairs (Table 5). There were three parameters of N transfer: first, percent N transfer; second, percent N in the receiver derived from transfer (% NDFT); and third, amount of N transferred. In NodMyc pairs, these three parameters were similar in either direction – from Casuarina to Eucalyptus or from Eucalyptus to Casuarina (Table 5). In NodMyc pairs, both % N transfer and % NDFT were very low (1.0%); amount of N transferred was < 1.4 mg N per plant. In NodMyc+ pairs, these three N transfer parameters were also similar in either direction, but they were 2–4 times greater than those in NodMyc pairs (Table 5).

Table 5.  Total N transfer and net N transfer between Casuarina and Eucalyptus seedlings grown in two-chambered pots. Plants were fertilized with (14NH4)2SO4 or K14NO3 for 5 months, and then with (15NH4)2SO4 or K15NO3 (N donor only) for 1 month before harvest
N-sourcePlant pairsN transfer (%)NDFT (%)N transfer (mg per plant)Net N transfer
Casuarina[DOWNWARDS ARROW]EucalyptusEucalyptus[DOWNWARDS ARROW]CasuarinaCasuarina[DOWNWARDS ARROW]EucalyptusEucalyptus[DOWNWARDS ARROW]CasuarinaCasuarina[DOWNWARDS ARROW]EucalyptusEucalyptus[DOWNWARDS ARROW]CasuarinaSink plantmg per plant
  1. Data are means ± SE (n = 9). For each parameter, values followed by different letters designate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) between directions of transfer in pairs for a given N form within rows (a, b, c), and between pairs for a given N form within columns (x, y, z), respectively. NDFT, N in the receiver derived from transfer; C, Casuarina; E, Eucalyptus; M, mycorrhizal status; F, nodulation status.

(15NH4)2SO4CM–F–[LEFT RIGHT ARROW]EM–0.6 ± 0 (a, z) 0.3 ± 0 (a, z)0.9 ± 0 (a, z)0.3 ± 0 (a, z) 1.3 ± 0 (a, z) 0.6 ± 0 (a, z)Eucalyptus +0.7
CM+F–[LEFT RIGHT ARROW]EM+1.3 ± 0 (a, y) 1.0 ± 0.1(a, y)2.1 ± 0 (a, y)1.0 ± 0.1(a, y) 3.5 ± 0.7(a, y) 2.4 ± 0.2(a, y)Eucalyptus +1.1
CM+F+[LEFT RIGHT ARROW]EM+2.4 ± 0.1(b, x)11.3 ± 1.1(a, x)5.9 ± 0.3(a, x)7.0 ± 1.1(a, x)17.4 ± 1.2(b, x)43.7 ± 6.2(a, x)Casuarina+26.3
K15NO3CM–F–[LEFT RIGHT ARROW]EM–0.7 ± 0.1(a, z) 0.7 ± 0.1(a, z)1.0 ± 0.1(a, z)0.7 ± 0 (a, z) 1.4 ± 0.1(a, z) 1.4 ± 0.1(a, z)Neither  0
CM+F–[LEFT RIGHT ARROW]EM+1.4 ± 0.1(a, y) 2.0 ± 0 (a, y)2.1 ± 0.1(a, y)1.7 ± 0.1(a, y) 3.6 ± 0.7(a, y) 4.1 ± 0.8(a, y)Casuarina +0.5
CM+F+[LEFT RIGHT ARROW]EM+3.5 ± 0.3(b, x)12.7 ± 0.7(a, x)8.6 ± 0.2(a, x)7.3 ± 0.3(a, x)24.1 ± 1.0(b, x)50.1 ± 5.8(a, x)Casuarina+26.0

In Nod+Myc+ pairs, N transfer expressed as % NDFT was similar in either direction, while % N transfer and amounts of N transfer were different and depended on the direction from Casuarina to Eucalyptus or from Eucalyptus to Casuarina (Table 5). In Nod+Myc+ pairs, compared with NodMyc+ pairs, more N was transferred to Eucalyptus (5–7 times) or to Casuarina (12–18 times). When Eucalyptus was paired with Nod+Myc+Casuarina, nonN2-fixing Myc+Eucalyptus donated 2.1–2.5 times more N to Nod+Myc+Casuarinas than the reverse (Table 5). In addition, NodMyc and Myc+ pairs showed little net N transfer, while Nod+Myc+ pairs showed much greater net N transfer to Casuarina (Table 5).


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

Biological nitrogen fixation

We used two strains of Frankia, UGL020604 and UGL020605, which are known to be highly effective on Ccunninghamiana (Wheeler et al., 2000). In our study, N2-fixation by C. cunninghamiana (27–29%) was generally comparable with data from other studies with Casuarina species including Ccunninghamiana (Mariotti et al., 1992; Parrota et al., 1994, 1996; Subbarao & Rodriguez-Barrueco, 1995). We used 15N natural abundance to calculate both percent of total plant N supplied by N2-fixation and the amount of N in the nodules expressed as g N mg−1 dry weight nodule. It is difficult to compare our values with Reddell & Bowen (1985) and Reddell et al. (1988, 1997). Reddell and coworkers calculated the amount of N in the nodule that was derived from fixation as mg N fixed mg−1 nodule dry weight; they did not calculate total nodule N, which includes N from other sources such as soils. In our study, plants received only 5 ml per pot of 4 mmol N as either (14NH4)2SO4 or K14NO3 once a week as a fertilizer. This low N load did not reduce fixation. Other studies reported that low N fertilization even stimulated N2-fixation (Huss-Danell, 1997; Wheeler et al., 2000). There was no effect of N source on N2-fixation in our study, but Zhang and Torrey (1985) found that NH4+ inhibited nodulation of C. cunninghamiana more than NO3. Other studies with Casuarina species did report reduction of fixation by either NH4+ or NO3 (Kohls & Baker, 1989; Arnone et al., 1994; Baker et al., 1994).

Mycorrhizal colonization

Mycorrhizal colonization in Casuarina (c. 35%) and in Eucalyptus (c. 65%) was generally higher than previously reported by other researchers. With a variety of EM fungi, Casuarina had 10–40% EM (Gardner, 1986; Theodorou & Reddell, 1991; Subbarao & Rodriguez-Barrueco, 1995); and Eucalyptus formed 10–60% EM colonization (Chilvers et al., 1987; Bellei et al., 1992; Burgess et al., 1993, 1994; May & Simpson, 1997; Reddell et al., 1999; Chen et al., 2000). Our seedlings were both EM and nodulated. Gardner (1986) and Subbarao & Rodriguez-Barrueco (1995) also worked with EM and nodulated Casuarinas species. We did not observe any increase in mycorrhization with nodulation, nor did Gardner (1986). Well-controlled aseptic and suitable glasshouse environments may have favored higher mycorrhizal colonization rates.

Common mycorrhizal networks between plants

In our experiment, fungal mycelia grew through nylon mesh and linked the roots of Casuarina and Eucalyptus, establishing a common EM network (He, 2002). We demonstrated that the CMN functioned in two-way N transfer. Mycorrhizal links between plants have been observed in transparent microcosms (Francis & Read, 1984; Newman, 1988; Newman et al., 1994) and by carbon and phosphorus isotope autoradiography (Chiariello et al., 1982; Francis & Read, 1984; McKendrick et al., 2000). Nitrogen movement through mycorrhizal linkage or CMNs from plant to plant has been reported (Haystead et al., 1988; Eissenstat, 1990; Bethlenfalvay et al., 1991; Frey & Schuepp, 1992, 1993; Arnebrant et al., 1993; Johansen et al., 1993a,b; Ikram et al., 1994; Tobar et al., 1994a,b; Ekblad & Huss-Danell, 1995; Ek et al., 1996; Johansen & Jensen, 1996). Read (1997) discussed the ecological importance of nutrient transfer through a CMN and speculated that nutrient transfer affects plant growth and biogeochemical cycling. Two-way nutrient transfer could reduce competition for soil resources between plants.

Responses of plant growth to mycorrhizal colonization and nodulation

Both biomass and N content in Casuarina and Eucalyptus were highest when Casuarina was Nod+Myc+, lower in NodMyc+ plants, and lowest in NodMyc plants. Although mycorrhizal infection was double in Eucalyptus compared with Casuarina, this had a slight effect on N accumulation by Eucalyptus. Mycorrhization did, however, enhance N accumulation by NodMyc+Casuarina. Compared with NodMyc+Casuarina, N content doubled in Nod+Myc+Casuarina, especially when Casuarina was the receiver. As the receiver, Casuarina experienced a 1-month-period with no N fertilizer, perhaps creating nutrient stress. The magnitude of increase in N content in mycorrhizal Eucalyptus was much less when they were partnered with Nod+Myc+Casuarina, rather than with NodMyc+Casuarina. Thus, the combination of Frankia and a mycorrhizal fungus had the greatest effect on growth of Casuarina. Both Casuarina and Eucalyptus receivers obtained substantial benefit via CMNs from their donors, when Casuarina was nodulated and mycorrhizal. Biomass production by Casuarina and Eucalyptus was similar whether either species acted as donor or receiver. This suggested a physiological benefit to receivers from N transfer. In our study, NodMyc+ seedlings were generally taller, had larger root systems, greater shoot and/or root biomass and higher N content than NodMyc seedlings. Similar results were observed for NodMyc+ and Nod+Myc+ seedlings. This has been reported by others (Smith & Read, 1997; Jonsson et al., 2001; Rogers et al., 2001).

Below-ground N-transfer between plants

Our results demonstrated that ectomycorrhizas mediated bidirectional N transfer between Casuarina and Eucalyptus. In the NodMyc treatment, there was almost no N transfer (< 1% in both N transfer and NDFT) to Casuarina or to Eucalyptus, and very low N transfer (c. 2% in both N transfer and NDFT) to Casuarina or to Eucalyptus in the NodMyc+ treatment. By contrast, N transfers were greatest in the Nod+Myc+ treatment. More N moved to Nod+Myc+Casuarina than to Myc+Eucalyptus, for both 15NH4+ and 15NO3. About twice as much N was transferred from Eucalyptus to Nod+Myc+Casuarinas than the reverse, resulting in increased growth by Casuarina due to interspecific N transfer. Since there was virtually no N transfer in the nonmycorrhizal treatment, but significant N transfer in the mycorrhizal treatment, N transfer was mediated by mycorrhizal fungi. The much higher N transfer between nodulated mycorrhizal plants indicated that mycorrhizas and Frankia together enhanced N fluxes between N2-fixing Casuarina and nonN2-fixing mycorrhizal Eucalyptus. The amount of N transfer was significantly greater from Eucalyptus to Nod+Myc+Casuarina than the reverse, contradicting the general hypothesis that N flows from N2-fixing to nonN2-fixing plants (Bethlenfalvay et al., 1991; Frey & Schuepp, 1993). However,% NDFT was similar for Casuarina and Eucalyptus even in Nod+Myc+ treatment, regardless of the direction of N transfer.

Nitrogen transfer from legume to non-legume can take place by indirect or direct routes (McNeill & Wood, 1990). Indirect N transfer via soil solution comes from dead and decayed nodules and roots (Dubach & Russelle, 1994), exudates such as ammonium, amino acids and amides from legume roots (Ta et al., 1989; Paynel et al., 2001), and sloughed-off root-cortical cells (Brophy & Heichel, 1989). These materials are deposited in soil and could be absorbed by adjacent plants. This is the soil pathway (Stern, 1993; Chalk, 1996). Direct N transfer may be mediated by mycorrhizal hyphae where CMNs connect plants. One-way N transfer via CMNs has been demonstrated using fine nylon mesh barriers that allow passage of hyphae but not roots (Bethlenfalvay et al., 1991; Frey & Schuepp, 1992; Arnebrant et al., 1993; Johansen & Jensen, 1996). The one-way N transfer hypothesis states that N flows from an N-rich legume source (N donor) to an N-poor nonlegume receiver (sink) (Bethlenfalvay et al., 1991; Frey & Schuepp, 1993). AM-mediated (15NH4+ or 15NO3) or EM-mediated (15NH4+ only) one-way N transfer from N2-fixing to nonN2-fixing plants has been reported (Bethlenfalvay et al., 1991; Frey & Schuepp, 1992; Arnebrant et al., 1993; Ekblad & Huss-Danell, 1995; Johansen & Jensen, 1996; Martensson et al., 1998). None of these studies measured bidirectional transfer.

We calculated net N transfer as the difference between N transferred from Casuarina to Eucalyptus and from Eucalyptus to Casuarina. Net N transfer was low in both the NodMyc and the NodMyc+ treatments (Table 5). Surprisingly, in the Nod+Myc+ treatment, there was greater net N transfer from nonN2-fixing Eucalyptus to N2-fixing Casuarina (Table 5). A similar phenomenon was reported for grass to legume pairs, resulting in a two-way N-flow between N2-fixing and nonN2-fixing plants (Brophy et al., 1987; Tomm et al., 1994; Hogh-Jensen & Schjoerring, 2000). Transfer was not significant under N-limited conditions and effects of mycorrhization were not examined in those studies. N transfer from barley to pea seedlings connected by Glomus intraradices was very low (Johansen & Jensen, 1996). No N transfer was found between clover and ryegrass through AM hyphal links (Rogers et al., 2001).

Inorganic N in soil is available to plants as NH4+ or NO3 (Forde & Clarkson, 1999). Most EM fungi can assimilate NH4+ (Jongbloed et al., 1991; Martin & Botton, 1993; Martin & Plassard, 2001), but few can efficiently reduce NO3 (Scheromm et al., 1990; Martin & Botton, 1993; Martin & Plassard, 2001). Apparently most AM fungi can assimilate both NH4+ (Smith et al., 1985; Cliquet & Stewart, 1993; Johansen et al., 1996) and NO3 (Ho & Trappe, 1975; Johansen et al., 1996; Faure et al., 1998). The less mobile NH4+ is adsorbed to soil colloids and moves toward plant roots by diffusion. The highly mobile NO3 is transported toward plant roots by mass flow (Brady & Weil, 2002). Mycorrhizal hyphae may play a greater role in transport of NH4+ than of NO3 to plant roots, except in water-deficient soil (Tobar et al., 1994b; Wu et al., 1999).

Our results showed that mycorrhization increased biomass production and N accumulation and that plant biomass increased with N content for both species. Mycorrhizas enhanced N accumulation, biomass production and N transfer between plants, and may thus affect plant fitness. Mycorrhizas had less impact on N accumulation in nonN2-fixing Eucalyptus than in N2-fixing Casuarina, despite the fact that Eucalyptus had nearly double the mycorrhizal infection compared with Casuarina. When Casuarina was nodulated and mycorrhizal and when Eucalyptus was mycorrhizal, biomass yield and N content were maximized in both plants. Our data corroborate previous reports that the main effect of mycorrhization on plant N status was in N2-fixing plants (Hayman, 1986). All these data suggest that N transfer has biological significance. Mycorrhization, together with N availability, plays a vital role in re-distribution of N between plants. Considering that N supply is crucial for plant growth in most terrestrial ecosystems (Vitousek et al., 1997; Moffat, 1998), and that the potential benefits of N transfer are great (CSIRO Publishing, 1998), two-way N transfer may be very significant.


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

For valuable comments on the manuscript, we thank two anonymous reviewers and Dr Francis Martin, the New Phytologist Section Editor; Dr D Southworth, Department of Biology, Southern Oregon University; and Dr AJ Bloom, Department of Vegetable Crops, University of California at Davis, USA. This research was supported by Postgraduate Research Scholarships from the Department of Education, Science and Training, and the University of Queensland, Australia; and a Postdoctoral Fellowship from NSF grant ‘Biocomplexity Phase I’ (DEB-9981711 to Dr CS Bledsoe). XH He is grateful to the Education Department of Yunnan Province and the Yunnan Normal University, China for permission to study overseas.


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and Methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References
  • Ahmad I, Hellebust JA. 1991. Enzymology of nitrogen assimilation in mycorrhiza. Methods in Microbiology 23: 181202.
  • Arnebrant K, Ek H, Finlay RD, Soderstrom B. 1993. Nitrogen translocation between Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. seedlings inoculated with Frankia sp. & Pinus contorta Doug. ex Loud seedlings connected by a common ectomycorrhizal mycelium. New Phytologist 124: 231242.
  • Arnone JA, Kohls SJ, Baker DD. 1994. Nitrate effects on nodulation and nitrogenase activity of actinorhizal Casuarina studied in split-root systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 26: 599606.
  • Attiwill PM, Adams MA. 1996. Nutrition of eucalypts. Collingwood, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
  • Baker DD, Du D, Fried M. 1994. Influence of combined nitrogen level and Eucalyptus competition on dinitrogen fixation in nodulated Casuarina. Protoplasm 183: 2428.
  • Bellei MDM, Garbaye J, Gil M. 1992. Mycorrhizal succession in young Eucalyptus viminalis plantations in Santa Catarina (Southern Brazil). Forest Ecology and Management 54: 14.
  • Bethlenfalvay GJ, Reyes-Solis MG, Camel SB, Ferrera-Cerrato R. 1991. Nutrient transfer between the root zones of soybean and maize plants connected by a common mycorrhizal mycelium. Physiologia Plantarum 82: 423432.
  • Brady NC, Weil RR. 2002. The nature and properties of soils, 13th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall International, Inc.
  • Brophy L, Heichel GH. 1989. Nitrogen release from roots of alfalfa and soybean grown in sand culture. Plant and Soil 116: 7784.
  • Brophy L, Heichel GH, Russel MP. 1987. Nitrogen transfer from forage legumes to grasses in a systematic planting design. Crop Science 27: 753757.
  • Brundrett MC, Bougher N, Dell B, Malajczuk N. 1996. Working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture (ACIAR Monograph 32). Canberra, Australia: The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
  • Burgess T, Dell B, Malajczuk N. 1994. Variation in mycorrhizal development and growth-stimulation by 20 Pisolithus isolates inoculated on to Eucalyptus-grandis W. Hill ex Maiden. New Phytologist 127: 731739.
  • Burgess T, Malajczuk N, Grove TS. 1993. The ability of 16 ectomycorrhizal fungi to increase growth and phosphorus uptake of Eucalyptus-globulus labill and E. diversicolor F. Muell. Plant and Soil 153: 155164.
  • Chalk PM. 1996. Nitrogen transfer from legumes to cereals in intercropping. In: ItoO, JohansenC, Adu-GyamfiJJ, KatayamaK, RaoJVDK, RegoTJ, eds. Dynamics of roots and nitrogen in cropping systems of the semi-arid tropics. Ibaraki, Japan: Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences. 351374.
  • Chen YL, Brundrett MA, Dell B. 2000. Effects of ectomycorrhizas and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas, alone or in competition, on root colonization and growth of Eucalyptus globulus and E. urophylla. New Phytologist 146: 545556.
  • Chiariello N, Hickman JA, Mooney HA. 1982. Endomycorrhizal role for interspecific transfer of phosphorus in a community of annual plants. Science 217: 941943.
  • Chilvers GA, Lapeyrie FF, Horan DP. 1987. Ectomycorrhizal vs endomycorrhizal fungi within the same root system. New Phytologist 107: 441448.
  • Cliquet JB, Stewart GR. 1993. Ammonium assimilation in Zea mays L. infected with a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus fasciculatum. Plant Physiology 101: 865871.
  • CSIRO Publishing (Special issue). 1998. Legumes and Cereals. Australian Journal Agricultural Research 49: 303564.
  • Dubach M, Russelle MP. 1994. Forage legume roots and nodules and their role in nitrogen transfer. Agronomy Journal 86: 259266.
  • Eissenstat DM. 1990. A comparison of phosphorus and nitrogen transfer between plants of different phosphorus status. Oecologia 82: 342347.
  • Ek H, Andersson S, Soderstrom B. 1996. Carbon and nitrogen flow in silver birch and Norway spruce connected by a common mycorrhizal mycelium. Mycorrhiza 6: 465467.
  • Ekblad A, Huss-Danell K. 1995. Nitrogen fixation by Alnus incana and nitrogen transfer from A. incana to Pinus sylvestris influenced by macronutrients and ectomycorhiza. New Phytologist 131: 453459.
  • Faure S, Cliquet JB, Thephany G, Boucaud J. 1998. Nitrogen assimilation in Lolium perenne colonized by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus fasciculatum. New Phytologist 138: 411417.
  • Forde BG, Clarkson DT. 1999. Nitrate and ammonium nutrition of plants: physiological and molecular perspectives. Advances in Botanical Research Incorporating Advances in Plant Pathology 30: 190.
  • Francis R, Read DJ. 1984. Direct transfer of carbon between plants connected by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelium. Nature 307: 5356.
  • Frey B, Schuepp H. 1992. Transfer of symbiotically fixed nitrogen from berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) to maize via vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae. New Phytologist 122: 447454.
  • Frey B, Schuepp H. 1993. A role of vesicular-arbuscular (VA) mycorrhizal fungi in facilitating interplant nitrogen transfer. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 25: 651658.
  • Gardner IA. 1986. Mycorrhizas of actinorhizal plants. MIRCEN Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2: 147160.
  • Hayman DS. 1986. Mycorrhizas of nitrogen-fixing legumes. MIRCEN Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2: 121145.
  • Haystead A, Malajczuk N, Grove TS. 1988. Underground transfer of nitrogen between pasture plants infected with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 108: 417423.
  • He XH. 2002. Nitrogen exchange between plants through common mycorrhizal networks. PhD Thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Ho I, Trappe JM. 1975. Nitrate reducing capacity of two vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycologia 67: 886888.
  • Hogh-Jensen H, Schjoerring JK. 2000. Below-ground nitrogen transfer between different grassland species: Direct quantification by 15N leaf feeding compared with indirect dilution of soil 15N. Plant and Soil 227: 171183.
  • Huss-Danell K. 1997. Actinorhizal symbioses and their N2 fixation. New Phytologist 136: 375405.
  • Ikram A, Jensen ES, Jakobsen I. 1994. No significant transfer of N and P from Pueraria phaseoloides to Hevea brasiliensis via hyphal links of arbuscular mycorrhiza. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 26: 15411547.
  • Johansen A, Finlay RD, Olsson PA. 1996. Nitrogen metabolism of external hyphae of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices. New Phytologist 133: 705712.
  • Johansen A, Jakobsen I, Jensen ES. 1993a. External hyphae of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus associated with Trifolium subterraneum L. 3. hyphal transport of 32P and 15N. New Phytologist 124: 6168.
  • Johansen A, Jakobsen I, Jensen ES. 1993b. Hyphal transport by a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus of N applied to the soil as ammonium or nitrate. Biology and Fertility of Soils 16: 6670.
  • Johansen A, Jensen ES. 1996. Transfer of N and P from intact or decomposing roots of pea to barley interconnected by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28: 7381.
  • Jongbloed RH, Clement JMM, Borst-Pauwels GWH. 1991. Kinetics of NH4+ and K+ uptake by ectomycorrhizal fungi: Effects of NH4+ on uptake. Physiologia Plantarum 83: 427432.
  • Jonsson LM, Nilsson MA, Wardle DA, Zackrisson O. 2001. Context dependent effects of ectomycorrhizal species richness on tree seedling productivity. Oikos 93: 353364.
  • Knowles R, Blackburn TH. 1993. Nitrogen isotope techniques. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.
  • Kohls SJ, Baker DD. 1989. Effects of substrate nitrate concentration on symbiotic nodule formation in actinorhizal plants. Plant and Soil 118: 171179.
  • Laskowski DA, O'Melia FC, Griffith JD, Regoli AJ, Joungson CR, Goring CAI. 1975. Effect of 2-chloro-6-(trichloromethyl) pyridine and its hydrolysis product 6-chloropicolinic acid on soil microorganisms. Journal of Environmental Quality 4: 412417.
  • Mariotti A, Sougoufara B, Dommergues YR. 1992. Estimation of nitrogen fixation using the natural abundance method in a plantation of Casuarina equisetifolia (Forst). Soil Biology and Biochemistry 24: 647653.
  • Martensson AM, Rydberg I, Vestberg M. 1998. Potential to improve transfer of N in intercropped systems by optimising host-endophyte combinations. Plant and Soil 205: 5766.
  • Martin F, Botton B. 1993. Nitrogen metabolism of ectomycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizas. Advances in Botanical Research: Incorporating Advances in Plant Pathology 9: 83102.
  • Martin F, Plassard C. 2001. Nitrogen assimilation by ectomycorrhizal symbiosis. In: Morot-GaudryJ-F, ed. Nitrogen assimilation by plants: physiological, biochemical and molecular aspects. Enfield, NH, USA: Science Publishers, Inc, 169183.
  • May TW, Simpson JA. 1997. Fungal diversity and ecology in eucalypt ecosystems. In: WilliamsJ, WoinarskiJ, eds. Eucalypt Ecology: Individuals to Ecosystems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 246277.
  • McKendrick SL, Leake JR, Taylor DL, Read DJ. 2000. Symbiotic germination and development of myco-heterotrophic plants in nature: transfer of carbon from ectomycorrhizal Salix repens and Betula pendula to the orchid Corallorhiza trifida through shared hyphal connections. New Phytologist 145: 539548.
  • McNeill AM, Wood M. 1990. Fixation and transfer of nitrogen by white clover to ryegrass. Soil Use and Management 6: 8486.
  • Moffat AS. 1998. Global nitrogen overload problem grows critical. Science 279: 988989.
  • Newman EI. 1988. Mycorrhizal links between plants: their functioning and ecological significance. Advances in Ecological Research 18: 243271.
  • Newman EI, Devoy ALN, Basen NJ, Fowles KJ. 1994. Plant species that can be linked by VA mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 126: 691693.
  • Parrota JA, Baker DD, Fried M. 1994. Application of N-15 enrichment methodologies to estimate nitrogen fixation in Casuarina equisetifolia. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 24: 201207.
  • Parrota JA, Baker DD, Fried M. 1996. Changes in dinitrogen fixation in maturing stands of Casuarina equisetifolia and Leucaena leucocephala. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 26: 16841691.
  • Paynel F, Murray PJ, Cliquet JB. 2001. Root exudates: a pathway for short-term N transfer from clover and ryegrass. Plant and Soil 229: 235243.
  • Read DJ. 1997. Mycorrhizal fungi: The ties that bind. Nature 388: 517518.
  • Reddell P, Bowen GD. 1985. Frankia source affects growth, nodulation and nitrogen-fixation in Casuarina species. New Phytologist 100: 115122.
  • Reddell P, Gordon V, Hopkins MS. 1999. Ectomycorrhizas in Eucalyptus tetrodonta and E. miniata forest communities in tropical northern Australia and their role in the rehabilitation of these forests following mining. Australian Journal of Botany 47: 881907.
  • Reddell P, Rosbrook PA, Bowen GD, Gwaze D. 1988. Growth-responses in Casuarina-cunninghamiana plantings to inoculation with Frankia. Plant and Soil 108: 7986.
  • Reddell P, Yun Y, Shipton WA. 1997. Do Casuarina cunninghamiana seedlings dependent on symbiotic N2-fixation have higher phosphorus requirements than those supplied with adequate fertilizer nitrogen? Plant and Soil 189: 213219.
  • Rogers JB, Laidlaw AS, Christie P. 2001. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the transfer of nutrients between white clover and perennial ryegrass. Chemosphere 42: 153159.
  • Scheromm P, Plassard C, Salsac L. 1990. Nitrate nutrition of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Soland in Ait.) ectomycorrhizal with Hebeloma cylindrosporum Romagn. New Phytologist 114: 9398.
  • Slangen JHG, Kerkhoff P. 1984. Nitrification inhibitiors in agriculture and horticulture: a literature review. Fertiliser Research 5: 176.
  • Smith SE, Read DJ. 1997. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 2nd edn. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.
  • Smith SE, St John BJ, Smith FA, Nicholas DJD. 1985. Activity of glutamine synthetase and glutamate dehydrogenase in Trifolium subterraneum L. & Allium cepa L. effects of mycorrhizal infection and phosphate nutrition. New Phytologist 99: 211227.
  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biology Research, 3rd edn. San Francisco, CA, USA: WH Freeman.
  • Stern WR. 1993. Nitrogen fixation and transfer in intercropping systems. Field Crops Research 34: 335356.
  • Subbarao NS, Rodriguez-Barrueco C. 1995. Casuarinas. Lebanon, NH, USA: Science Publishers, Inc.
  • Ta TC, Faris MA, McDowell FDH. 1989. Evaluation of 15N methods to measure nitrogen transfer from alfalfa to companion timonthy. Plant and Soil 114: 243247.
  • Theodorou C, Reddell P. 1991. In vitro synthesis of ectomycorrhizas on Casuarinaceae with range of mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 118: 279288.
  • Tobar RM, Azcon R, Barea JM. 1994a. The improvement of plant N acquisition from an ammonium-treated, drought-stressed soil by the fungal symbiont in arbuscular mycorrhizas. Mycorrhiza 4: 104108.
  • Tobar RM, Azcon R, Barea JM. 1994b. Improved nitrogen uptake and transport from 15Nitrogen-labelled nitrate by external hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhiza under water-stressed conditions. New Phytologist 126: 119122.
  • Tomm GO, Van Kessel C, Slinkard AE. 1994. Bi-directional transfer of nitrogen between alfalfa and bromegrass: Short and long term evidence. Plant and Soil 164: 7786.
  • Unkovich M, Pate J, McNeill A, Gibbs DJ. 2001. Stable isotope techniques in the study of biology processes and functioning of ecosystems. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG. 1997. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecological Applications 7: 737750.
  • Wheeler CT, Tilak M, Scrimgeour CM, Hooker JE, Handley LL. 2000. Effects of symbiosis with Frankia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on the natural abundance of 15N in four species of Casuarina. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 287297.
  • Wu B, Watanabe I, Hayatsu M, Nioh I. 1999. Effect of ectomycorrhizas on the growth and uptake and transport of 15N-labeled compounds by Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings under water-stressed conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils 28: 136138.
  • Zhang ZZ, Torrey JG. 1985. Biological and cultural characteristics of the effective Frankia strain HFPCcI3 (Actinomycetales) from Casuarina cunninghamiana (Casuarinaceae). Annals of Botany 56: 367378.