• Cochard H. 2002. A technique for measuring xylem hydraulic conductance under high negative pressures. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 815819.
  • Cochard H, Ameglio T, Cruiziat P. 2001a. The cohesion theory debate continues. Trends in Plant Science 6: 456.
  • Cochard H, Bodet C, Ameglio T, Cruiziat P. 2000. Cryo-scanning electron microscopy observations of vessel content during transpiration in walnut petioles. Facts or artifacts? Plant Physiology 124: 11911202.
  • Cochard H, Forestier S, Ameglio T. 2001b. A new validation of Scholander pressure chamber technique based on stem diameter variations. Journal of Experimental Botany. 52: 13611365.
  • Comstock JP. 1999. Why Canny's theory doesn't hold water. American Journal of Botany 86: 10771081.
  • Holbrook NM, Burns MJ, Field CB. 1995. Negative xylem pressures in plants: a test of the balancing pressure technique. Science 270: 11931194.
  • Melcher PJ, Meinzer FC, Yount DE, Goldstein GH, Zimmermann U. 1998. Comparative measurements of xylem pressure in transpiring and non-transpiring leaves by means of the pressure chamber and the xylem pressure probe. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 17571760.
  • Milburn JA. 1996. Sap ascent in vascular plants: Challengers to the Cohesion Theory ignore the significance of immature xylem and the recycling of Munch water. Annals of Botany 78: 399407.
  • Pockman WT, Sperry JS, O'Leary JW. 1995. Sustained and significant negative water pressure in xylem. Nature 378: 715716.
  • Richter H. 2001. The cohesion theory debate continues: the pitfalls of cryobiology. Trends in Plant Science 6: 456457.
  • Sperry JS, Saliendra NZ, Pockman WT, Cochard H, Cruiziat P, Davis SD, Ewers FW, Tyree MT. 1996. New evidence for large negative xylem pressures and their measurement by the pressure chamber method. Plant, Cell & Environment 19: 427436.
  • Steudle E. 1995. Trees under tension. Nature 378: 663664.
  • Steudle E. 2001. The cohesion-tension mechanism and the acquisition of water by plant roots. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology 52: 847875.
  • Stiller V, Sperry JS. 1999. Canny's Compensating Pressure Theory fails a test. American Journal of Botany 86: 10821086.
  • Tyree MT. 1997. The Cohesion-Tension theory of sap ascent: current controversies. Journal of Experimental Botany 48: 17531765.
  • Tyree MT. 1999. The forgotten component of plant water potential: a reply. Tissue pressures are not additive in the way M.J. Canny suggests. Plant Biology 1: 598601.
  • Tyree MT. 2003. The ascent of water. Nature 423: 923.
  • Tyree MT, Cochard H. 2003. Vessel content of leaves after excision: a test of the Scholander assumption. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 21332139.
  • Tyree MT, Cochard H, Cruiziat P. 2003. The water-filled versus air-filled status of vessels cut open in air: The ‘Scholander assumption’ revisited. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 613621.
  • Tyree MT, Zimmermann MH. 2002. Xylem structure and the ascent of sap. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
  • Wei C, Steudle E, Tyree MT. 1999a. Water ascent in plants: do ongoing controversies have a sound basis? Trends in Plant Science 4: 372375.
  • Wei C, Tyree MT, Steudle E. 1999b. Direct measurement of xylem pressure in leaves of intact maize plants. A test of the Cohesion-Tension theory taking hydraulic architecture into consideration. Plant Physiology 121: 11911205.
  • Zimmermann U, Schneider H, Wegner LH, Haase A. 2004. Water ascent in tall trees: does evolution of land plants rely on a highly metastable state? New Phytologist 162: 575615.