SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abney M, McPeek MS, Ober C. 2000. Estimation of variance components of quantitative traits in inbred populations. American Journal of Human Genetics 66: 629650.
  • Agren J, Schemske DW. 1993. Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in two annual monoecious herbs, Begonia hirsuta and B. semiovata. Evolution 47: 125135.
  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: A. Practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag.
  • Byers DL, Waller DM. 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 479513.
  • Campbell RB. 1986. The interdependence of mating structure and inbreeding depression. Theoretical Pop Biology 30: 232244.
  • Carr DE, Dudash MR. 2003. Recent approaches into the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in plants. Phility Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 358: 10711084.
  • Carr DE, Fenster CB, Dudash MR. 1997. The relationship between mating-system characters and inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 51: 363372.
  • Carr DE, Murphy JF, Eubanks MD. 2003. The susceptibility and response of inbred and outbred Mimulus guttatus to infection by cucumber mosaic virus. Evolutionary Ecology 17: 85103.
  • Chang S-M, Rausher MD. 1999. The role of inbreeding depression in maintaining the mixed mating system of the common morning glory, Ipomea purpurea. Evolution 53: 13661376.
  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237268.
  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1990. Inbreeding depression with heterozygote advantage and its effect on selection for modifiers changing the outcrossing rate. Evolution 44: 870888.
  • Charlesworth B, Hughes KA. 2000. The maintenance of genetic variation in life history traits. In: Krimbas, CB, ed. Evolutionary genetics from molecules to morphology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 369392.
  • Clausen J, Keck DD, Hiesey WM. 1940. Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. The effect of varied environments on western American plants Rep. 520. Washington, DC, USA: Carnegie Institute.
  • Cockerham CC. 1983. Covariances of relatives from self-fertilization. Crop Science 23: 11771180.
  • Cockerham CC, Weir BS. 1984. Covariances of relatives stemming from a population undergoing mixed self and random mating. Biometrics 40: 157164.
  • Conner JK. 2002. Genetic mechanisms of floral trait correlations in a natural population. Nature 420: 407410.
  • Crnokrak P, Barrett SCH. 2002. Perspective: Purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56: 23472358.
  • Crow JF. 1993. Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 9: 342.
  • Darwin CR. 1876. The effects of cross- and self-fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. London, UK: John Murray.
  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. London, UK: Prentice Hall.
  • Fishman L. 2001. Inbreeding depression in two populations of arenaria uniflora (caryophyllaceae) with contrasting mating systems. Heredity 86: 184194.
  • Gallais A. 1977. An experimental check of quantitative genetics on an autotetraploid plant, Medicago sativa, l., with special reference to the identity by descent relationship. In: PollackE, KempthorneO, BaileyTB, eds. Proceedings of the international Conference on Quantitative Genetics. Ames, Iowa, USA: State University Press, 519540.
  • Gardner CO. 1963. Estimates of genetic parameters in cross-fertilizing plants and their implications in plant breeding. National Academy of Sciences–Natural Research Council Publishers 982: 225252.
  • Gillespie JH, Turelli M. 1989. Genotype–environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation. Genetics 121: 129138.
  • Harris DL. 1964. Genotypic covariances between inbred relatives. Genetics 50: 13191348.
  • Hartl DL, Clark AG. 1989. Principles of population genetics. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Holsinger KE. 1988. Inbreeding depression doesn't matter: The genetic basis of mating-system evolution. Evolution 42: 12351244.
  • Holtsford TP, Ellstrand NC. 1990. Inbreeding effects in clarkia tembloriensis (onagraceae) populations with different natural outcrossing rates. Evolution 44: 20312046.
  • Husband BC, Schemske DW. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 5470.
  • Jarne P, Perdieu MA, Pernot AF, Delay B, David P. 2000. The influence of self-fertilization and grouping on fitness attributes in the freshwater snail Physa acuta: Population and individual inbreeding depression. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 645655.
  • Johnston MO, Schoen DJ. 1994. On the measurement of inbreeding depression. Evolution 48: 17351741.
  • Kalisz S. 1989. Fitness consequences of mating system, seed weight, and emergence date in a winter annual, Colinsia verna. Evolution 43: 12631272.
  • Keller LF, Waller DM. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 230241.
  • Kelly JK. 1999. An experimental method for evaluating the contribution of deleterious mutations to quantitative trait variation. Genetic Research 73: 263273.
  • Kelly JK. 2003. Deleterious mutations and the genetic variance of male fitness components in Mimulus guttatus. Genetics 164: 10711085.
  • Kelly JK, Arathi HS. 2003. Inbreeding and the genetic variance of floral traits in Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 90: 7783.
  • Kendall MG, Stuart A. 1973. The advanced theory of statistics, Vol. 2. New York, NY, USA: Hafner.
  • Kimura M. 1959. Conflict between self fertilization and outbreeding in plants. Annals of Report the National Institute Genetics Japan 9: 8788.
  • Koelewijn HP, Koski V, Savolainen O. 1999. Magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in scots pine (Pinus sylvestris 1.). Evolution 53: 758768.
  • Lande R, Schemske DW. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 2440.
  • Lloyd DG. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113: 6779.
  • Lynch M, Conery J, Burger R. 1995. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. American Naturalist 146: 489518.
  • Lynch M, Walsh B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative characters. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Moll RH, Lindsey MF, Robinson HF. 1964. Estimates of genetic variances and level of dominance in maize. Genetics 49: 411423.
  • Mutikainen P, Delph LF. 1998. Inbreeding depression in gynodioecious Lobelia siphilitica: Among-family differences override between-morph differences. Evolution 52: 15721582.
  • Norman JK, Sakai AK, Weller SG, Dawson TE. 1995. Inbreeding depression in morphological and physiological traits of Schiedea lydgatei (caryophyllaceae) in two environments. Evolution 49: 297306.
  • Parker IM, Nakamura RR, Schemske DW. 1995. Reproductive allocation and the fitness consequences of selfing in two sympatric species of Epilobium (Onagraceae) with contrasting mating systems. American Journal of Botany 82: 10071016.
  • Rao G-Y, Widen B, Andersson S. 2002. Patterns of inbreeding depression in a population of Brassica cretica (Brassicaceae): Evidence from family-level analyses. Biological Journal of Linnean Society 76: 317325.
  • Roach DA, Wulff RD. 1987. Maternal effects in plants. Annals of Review of Ecological Syst 18: 209236.
  • Rose MR. 1982. Antagonistic pleiotropy, dominance, and genetic-variation. Heredity 48: 6378.
  • Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE. 1992. Variance components. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
  • Shaw RG, Byers DL, Shaw FH. 1998. Genetic components of variation in Nemophila menziesii undergoing inbreeding: Morphology and flowering time. Genetics 150: 16491661.
  • Shultz S, Willis J. 1995. Individual variation in inbreeding depression – the roles of inbreeding history and mutation. Genetics 141: 12091223.
  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 2000. Biometry, 3rd edn. New York, NY, USA: Freeman and Company.
  • Stone JL, Motten AF. 2002. Anther-stigma separation is associated with inbreeding depression in Datura stramonium, a predominantly self-fertilizing annual. Evolution 56: 21872195.
  • Subramaniam B, Rausher MD. 2000. Balancing selection on a floral polymorphism. Evolution 54: 691695.
  • Takebayashi N, Delph LF. 2000. An association between a floral trait and inbreeding depression. Evolution 54: 840846.
  • Uyenoyama MK, Holsinger KE, Waller DM. 1993. Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 9: 327381.
  • Uyenoyama MK, Waller DM. 1991. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. Ii. Symmetric overdominance in viability. Theoretical Population Biology 40: 4777.
  • Vogler DW, Filmore K, Stephenson AG. 1999. Inbreeding depression in campanula rapunculoides 1. I. A comparison of inbreeding depression in plants derived from strong and weak self-incompatibility phenotypes. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 483494.
  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1977. Two-locus theory in quantitative genetics. In: PollackE, KempthorneO, BaileyTB, eds. Proceedings of the International Conference on Quantitative Genetics. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press, 247262.
  • Willis JH. 1999. Inbreeding load, average dominance, and the mutation rate for mildy deleterious alleles in Mimulus guttatus. Genetics 153: 18851898.