SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerly DD. 2000. Taxon sampling, correlated evolution, and independent contrasts. Evolution 54: 14801492.
  • Ackerly DD, Donoghue MJ. 1998. Leaf size, sapling allometry, and Corner's rules. Phylogeny and correlated evolution in maples (Acer). American Naturalist 152: 767791.
  • Akimoto J, Fukuhara T, Kikuzawa K. 1999. Sex ratios and genetic variation in a functionally androdiecious species, Schizopepon bryoniaefolius (Cucurbitaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 880886.
  • Baker PA, Freeman C, Harper KT. 1982. Variation in the breeding system of Acer grandidentatum. Forest Science 28: 563572.
  • Charlesworth D. 1984. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 22: 333348.
  • Charlesworth D. 1999. Theories of the evolution of dioecy. In: GeberMA, DawsonTE, DelphLE, eds. Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 3360.
  • Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 1978a. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 112: 975997.
  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1978b. Population-genetics of partial male-sterility and evolution of monoecy and dioecy. Heredity 41: 137153.
  • Darwin C. 1877. The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. New York, NY, USA: Appleton.
  • Dawson TE, Ehleringer JR. 1993. Gender specific physiology, carbon isotope discrimination, and habitat distribution in boxelder, Acer negundo. Ecology 74: 798815.
  • Dommée B, Bompar J-L, Denelle N. 1990. Sexual tetramorphism in Thymelaea hirsuta (Thymelaeaceae): evidence of the pathway from heterodichogamy to dioecy at the infraspecific level. American Journal of Botany 77: 14491462.
  • Dommée B, Geslot A, Thompson JD, Reille M, Denelle N. 1999. Androdioecy in the entomophilous tree Fraxinus ornus (Oleaceae). New Phytologist 143: 419426.
  • Dorken ME, Friedman J, Barrett SCH. 2002. The evolution and maintenance of monoecy and dioecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Evolution 56: 3141.
  • Felsenstein J. 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Fitch DHA, Bugajgaweda B, Emmons SW, Miyamoto MM, Fitch WM. 1995. 18S ribosomal-RNA gene phylogeny for some Rhabditidae related to Caenorhabditis. Testing the covarion hypothesis of molecular evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12: 346358.
  • Freeman C, Lovett Doust J, El-Keblawy A, Miglia K. 1997. Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. Botanical Review 63: 6592.
  • Gleiser G, Picher MC, Veintimilla P, Martínez J, Verdú M. 2004. Seed dormancy in relation to seed storage behaviour in Acer. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 145: 203208.
  • Haag ES, Kimble J. 2000. Regulatory elements required for development of Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodites are conserved in the tra-2 homologue of C. remanei, a male/female sister species. Genetics 155: 105116.
  • Hibbs DE, Fischer BC. 1979. Sexual and vegetative reproduction of striped maple (Acer pensylvanicum). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 106: 222227.
  • Ishida K, Hiura T. 1998. Pollen fertility and flowering phenology in an androdioecious tree, Fraxinus lanuginosa (Oleaceae), in Hokkaido, Japan. International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 941947.
  • De Jong PC. 1976. Flowering and sex expression in Acer L. A biosystematic study. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschoological Wageningen, Nederland 76: 1201.
  • De Jong PC. 1994. Taxonomy and reproductive biology of maples. In: Van GelderenDM, De JongPC, OterdoomHJ, eds. Maples of the World. Portland, OR, USA: Timber Press, 69103.
  • Krahenbuhl M, Yuan YM, Kupfer P. 2002. Chromosome and breeding system evolution of the genus Mercurialis (Euphorbiaceae): implications of ITS molecular phylogeny. Plant Systematics and Evolution 234: 155169.
  • Lepart J, Dommée B. 1992. Is Phyllirea angustifolia L. (Oleaceae) an androdioecious species?. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 108: 375387.
  • Liston A, Rieseberg L, Elias T. 1990. Functional androdioecy in the flowering plant Datisca glomerata. Nature 343: 641642.
  • Lloyd DG. 1974. The genetic contributions of individual males and females in dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms. Heredity 32: 4551.
  • Lloyd DG. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45: 325339.
  • Lloyd DG. 1979. Evolution towards dioecy in heterostylous populations. Plant Systematics and Evolution 131: 7180.
  • Lloyd DG. 1980. The distributions of gender in four angiosperm species illustrating two evolutionary pathways to dioecy. Evolution 34: 123134.
  • Mabberley DJ. 1997. The Plant-Book. A Portable Dictionary of Vascular Plants. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 1992. macclade Version 3: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2003. mesquite, A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. URL http://mesquiteproject.org
  • Matsui K. 1995. Sex expression, sex change and fruiting habit in an Acer rufinerve population. Ecological Research 10: 6574.
  • McShea DW, Venit EP. 2002. Testing for bias in the evolution of coloniality: a demonstration in cyclostome bryozoans. Paleobiology 28: 308327.
  • Mooers AO, Schluter D. 1999. Reconstructing ancestor states with maximum likelihood: support for one- and two-rate models. Systematic Biology 48: 623633.
  • Nosil P. 2002. Transition rates between specialization and generalization in phytophagous insects. Evolution 56: 17011706.
  • Pagel M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies – a general-method for the comparative-analysis of discrete characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 255: 3745.
  • Pagel M. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zoologica Scripta 26: 331348.
  • Pagel M. 1999a. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401: 877884.
  • Pagel M. 1999b. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 48: 612622.
  • Pannell J. 1997. Widespread functional androdioecy in Mercurialis annua L. (Euphorbiaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 61: 95116.
  • Pannell J. 2002. The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 397425.
  • Pendleton RL, Freeman C, McArthur ED, Sanderson SC. 2000. Gender specialization in heterodichogamous Grayia brandegei (Chenopodiaceae): evidence for an alternative pathway to dioecy. American Journal of Botany 87: 508516.
  • Renner S, Ricklefs R. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82: 596606.
  • Renner S, Won H. 2001. Repeated evolution of dioecy from monoecy in Siparunaceae (Laurales). Systematic Biology 50: 700712.
  • Rieseberg LH, Hanson MA, Philbrick CT. 1992. Androdioecy is derived from dioecy in Datiscaceae: evidence from restriction site mapping of PCR-amplified chloroplast DNA fragments. Systematic Botany 17: 324336.
  • Sakai S. 2001. Thrips pollination of androdioecious Castilla elastica (Moraceae) in a seasonal tropical forest. American Journal of Botany 88: 15271534.
  • Sato T. 2002. Phenology of sex expression and gender variation in a heterodichogamous maple, Acer japonicum. Ecology 83: 12261238.
  • Suh Y, Heo K, Park CW. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of maples (Acer L., Aceraceae) implied by nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. Journal of Plant Research 113: 193202.
  • Tian XZH, Guo ZH, Li DZ. 2002. Phylogeny of Aceraceae based on ITS and trnL-F data sets. Acta Botanica Sinica 44: 714724.
  • Traveset A, Willson MF, Verdú M. 2004. Characteristics of fleshy fruits in southeast Alaska: phylogenetic comparison with fruits from Illinois. Ecography 27: 4148.
  • Valiente-Banuet A, Rojas-Martínez A, Del Coro-Arizmendi M, Davila P. 1997. Pollination biology of two columnar cacti (Neobuxbaumia mezcalaensis and Neobuxbaumia macrocephala) in the Tehuacan Valley, Central Mexico. American Journal of Botany 84: 452455.
  • Verdú M. 2002. Age at maturity and diversification in woody angiosperms. Evolution 56: 13521361.
  • Verdú M. 2004. Physiological and reproductive differences between hermaphrodites and males in the androdioecious plant Fraxinus ornus. Oikos 105: 239246.
  • Verdú M, García-Fayos P, Gleiser G. 2004a. Mites attack males of the sexually polymorphic tree Acer opalus more harmfully and more often. Functional Ecology 18: 592597.
  • Verdú M, Montilla AI, Pannell JR. 2004b. Paternal effects on functional gender account for cryptic dioecy in a perennial plant. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 271: 20172023.
  • Wallander E. 2001. Evolution of wind pollination in Fraxinus (Oleaceae) – an ecophylogenetic approach. PhD thesis, Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University.
  • Webb CJ. 1999. Empirical studies: evolution and maintenance of dimorphic breeding systems. In: GeberMA, DawsonTE, DelphLE, eds. Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 6195.
  • Weller S, Sakai A. 1999. Using phylogenetic approaches for the analysis of plant breeding system evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 167199.
  • Wolf DE, Takebayashi N. 2004. Pollen limitation and the evolution of androdioecy from dioecy. American Naturalist 163: 122137.