SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerly D. 1997. Allocation, leaf display, and growth in fluctuating light environments. In: BazzazFA, GraceJ, eds. Plant Resource Allocation. New York: Academic Press, 231264.
  • Alpert P, Stuefer JF. 1997. Division of labour in clonal plants. In: De KroonH, Van GroenendaelJ, eds. The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Leiden, the Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers, 137154.
  • Baldocchi D, Collineau S. 1994. The physical nature of solar radiation in heterogeneous canopies: spatial and temporal attributes. In: CaldwellMM, PearcyRW, eds. Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants. Ecophysiological Processes Above- and Belowground. San Diego, USA: Academic Press, 2171.
  • Birch CPD, Hutchings MJ. 1994. Exploitation of patchily distributed soil resources by the clonal herb Glechoma hederaceae. Journal of Ecology 82: 653664.
  • Bradshaw AD. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics 13: 115155.
  • Casal JJ, Fankhauser C, Coupland G, Blazquez MA. 2004. Signalling for developmental plasticity. Trends in Plant Science 9: 309314.
  • Casper BB, Schenk HJ, Jackson RB. 2003. Defining a plant's belowground zone of influence. Ecology 84: 23132321.
  • Chazdon RL, Pearcy RW. 1991. The importance of sunflecks for forest understorey plants. Bioscience 41: 760766.
  • Coleman JS, McConnaughay KDM. 1995. A non-functional interpretation of a classical optimal-partitioning example. Functional Ecology 9: 951954.
  • Diggle PK. 1994. The expression of andromonoecy in Solanum hirtum (Solanaceae) – phenotypic plasticity and ontogenetic contingency. American Journal of Botany 81: 13541365.
  • Dong M. 1993. Morphological plasticity of the clonal herb Lamiastrum galeobdolon (L.) Ehrend. & Polatschek in response to partial shading. New Phytologist 124: 291300.
  • Dong M. 1995. Morphological responses to local light conditions in clonal herbs from contrasting habitats, and their modification due to physiological integration. Oecologia 101: 282288.
  • Drew MC. 1975. Comparison of the effects of a localized supply of phosphate, nitrate, ammonium and potassium on the growth of the seminal root system, and the shoot, in barley. New Phytologist 75: 479490.
  • Drew MC, Saker LR, Ashley TW. 1973. Nutrient supply and the growth of the seminal root system in barley. I. The effect of nitrate concentration on the growth of axies and laterals. Journal of Experimental Botany 24: 11891202.
  • Evans CG. 1972. The Qualitative Analysis of Plant Growth. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  • Evans JP, Cain ML. 1995. A spatially explicit test of foraging behavior in a clonal plant. Ecology 76: 11471155.
  • Fransen B, De Kroon H, Berendse F. 1998. Root morphological plasticity and nutrient acquisition of perennial grass species from habitats of different nutrient availability. Oecologia 115: 351358.
  • Fransen B, De Kroon H, De Kovel C, Van Den Bosch F. 1999. Disentangling the effects of selective root placement and inherent growth rate on plant biomass accumulation in heterogeneous environments: a modelling study. Annals of Botany 84: 305311.
  • Guo D, Mou P, Jones RH, Mitchell RJ. 2002. Temporal changes in spatial patterns of soil moisture following disturbance: an experimental approach. Journal of Ecology 90: 338347.
  • Harper JL. 1985. Modules, branches and the capture of resources. In: JacksonJBC, BussLW, CookRE, eds. Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press, 133.
  • Haukioja E. 1991. The influence of grazing on the evolution, morphology and physiology of plants as modular organisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B -Biology Sciences 333: 241247.
  • Hodge A. 2004. The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients. New Phytologist 162: 924.
  • Hook PB, Burke IC, Lauenroth WK. 1991. Heterogeneity of soil and plant N and C associated with individual plants and openings in North American shortgrass priarie. Plant and Soil 138: 247256.
  • Huber H, Fijan A, During HJ. 1998. A comparative study of spacer plasticity in erect and stoloniferous herbs. Oikos 81: 576586.
  • Huber H, Kane NC, Heschel MS, Von Wettberg EJ, Banta J, Leuck AM, Schmitt J. 2004. Frequency and microenvironmental pattern of selection on plastic shade-avoidance traits in a natural population of Impatiens capensis. American Naturalist 163: 548563.
  • Huber H, Lukacs S, Watson MA. 1999. Spatial structure of stoloniferous herbs: an interplay between structural blue-print, ontogeny and phenotypic plasticity. Plant Ecology 141: 107115.
  • Huber H, Stuefer JF. 1997. Shade induced changes in the branching pattern of a stoloniferous herb: functional response or allometric effect? Oecologia 110: 478486.
  • Hutchings MJ, De Kroon H. 1994. Foraging in plants: the role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Advances in Ecological Research 25: 159238.
  • Hutchings MJ, Wijesinghe DK. 1997. Patchy habitats, division of labour and growth dividends in clonal plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 390394.
  • Jackson RB, Caldwell MM. 1993. The scale of nutrient heterogeneity around individual plants and its quantification with geostatistics. Ecology 74: 612614.
  • Jones M. Harper JL. 1987. The influence of neighbours on the growth of trees. I. The demography of buds in Betula pendula. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 232: 118.
  • De Jong G. 1995. Phenotypic plasticity as a product of selection in a variable environment. American Naturalist 145: 493512.
  • Katagiri F. 2004. A global view of defense gene expression regulation – a highly interconnected signaling network. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7: 506511.
  • Kessler A, Baldwin IT. 2002. Plant responses to insect herbivory: The emerging molecular analysis. Annual Review of Plant Biology 53: 299328.
  • De Kroon H, Fransen B, Van Rheenen JWA, Van Dijk A, Kreulen R. 1996. High levels of inter-ramet water translocation in two rhizomatous Carex species, as quantified by deuterium labelling. Oecologia 106: 7384.
  • De Kroon H, Schieving F. 1990. Resource partitioning in relation to clonal growth strategy. In: Van GroenendaelJ, De KroonH, eds. Clonal Growth in Plants – Regulation and Function. The. Hague, the Netherlands: SPB Academic Publishing, 113130.
  • Lovett Doust L. 1987. Population-dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens). 3. Responses to light and nutrient supply. Journal of Ecology 75: 555568.
  • Pedersen B, Tuomi J. 1995. Hierarchical selection and fitness in modular and clonal organisms. Oikos 73: 167180.
  • Pierik R, Whitelam GC, Voesenek LACJ, De Kroon H, Visser EJW. 2004. Canopy studies on ethylene-insensitive tobacco identify ethylene as a novel element in blue light and plant-plant signalling. Plant Journal 38: 310319.
  • Pieterse CM, Van Loon L. 2004. NPR1: the spider in the web of induced resistance signaling pathways. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7: 456464.
  • Pigliucci M, Pollard H, Cruzan MB. 2003. Comparative studies of evolutionary responses to light environments in Arabidopsis. American Naturalist 161: 6882.
  • Preston KA, Ackerly DD. 2004. Allometry and evolution in modular organisms. In: PigliucciM, PrestonKA, eds. Modularity and Phenotypic Complexity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 80106.
  • Robin C, Hay MJM, Newton PCD. 1994a. Effect of light quality (red: far-red ratio) and defoliation treatments applied at a single phytomer on axillary bud outgrowth in Trifolium repens L. Oecologia 100: 236242.
  • Robin C, Hay MJM, Newton PCD, Greer DH. 1994b. Effect of light quality (red: far-red ratio) at the apical bud of the main stolon on morphogenesis of Trifolium repens L. Annals of Botany 74: 119123.
  • Robinson D. 1994. The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. New Phytologist 127: 635674.
  • Ryel RJ, Beyschlag W, Caldwell MM. 1994. Light field heterogeneity among tussock grasses: Theoretical considerations of light harvesting and seedling establishment in tussocks and uniform tiller distributions. Oecologia 98: 241246.
  • Sachs T, Novoplansky A. 1997. What does aclonal organization suggest concerning clonal plants? In: De KroonH, Van GroenendaelJ, eds. The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Leiden, the Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers, 5577.
  • Scheiner SM. 1993. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 3568.
  • Schimel JP, Bennett J. 2004. Nitrogen mineralization: Challenges of a changing paradigm. Ecology 85: 591602.
  • Schlichting CD. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 667693.
  • Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M. 1998. Phenotypic Evolution: a Reaction Norm Perspective. Sunderland, USA: Sinauer.
  • Schmitt J, Stinchcombe JR, Heschel MS, Huber H. 2003. The adaptive evolution of plasticity: Phytochrome-mediated shade avoidance responses. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43: 459469.
  • Schmitt J, Wulff RD. 1993. Light spectral quality, phytochrome and plant competition. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 4751.
  • Smith H. 2000. Phytochromes and light signal perception by plants – an emerging synthesis. Nature 407: 585591.
  • Smith H, Whitelam GC. 1997. The shade avoidance syndrome: multiple responses mediated by multiple phytochromes. Plant, Cell & Environment 20: 840844.
  • Sprugel DG. 2002. When branch autonomy fails: Milton's Law of resource availability and allocation. Tree Physiology 22: 11191124.
  • Sprugel DG, Hinckley TM, Schaap W. 1991. The theory and practice of branch autonomy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22: 309334.
  • Stark JM. 1994. Causes of soil heterogeneity at different scales. In: CaldwellMM, PearcyRW, eds. Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants. Ecophysiological Processes Above- and Belowground. San Diego, USA: Academic Press, 255284.
  • Stoll P, Schmid B. 1998. Architecture, biomass allocation, and bud demography of Pinus sylvestris branches in heterogeneous light environments. Journal of Ecology 86: 934945.
  • Stuefer JF. 1996. Potential and limitations of current concepts regarding the response of clonal plants to environmental heterogeneity. Vegetatio 127: 5570.
  • Stuefer JF. 1998. Two types of division of labour in clonal plants: benefits, costs and constraints. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics 1: 4760.
  • Stuefer JF, De Kroon H, During HJ. 1996. Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by spatial division of labour in a clonal plant. Functional Ecology 10: 328334.
  • Stuefer JF, During HJ, De Kroon H. 1994. High benefits of clonal integration in two stoloniferous species, in response to heterogeneous light conditions. Journal of Ecology 82: 511518.
  • Sultan SE, Spencer HG. 2002. Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. American Naturalist 160: 271283.
  • Tang YH, Washitani I. 1995. Characteristics of small-scale heterogeneity in light availability within a Miscanthus sinensis canopy. Ecological Research 10: 189197.
  • Thompson L. 1993. The influence of the radiation environment around the node on morphogenesis and growth of white clover (Trifolium repens). Grass and Forage Science 48: 271278.
  • Thompson L. 1995. Sites of photoperception in white clover. Grass and Forage Science 50: 259262.
  • Tuomi J, Vuorisalo T. 1989. Hierarchical selection in modular organisms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4: 209213.
  • Via S, Gomulkiewicz R, De Jong G, Scheiner SM, Schlichting CD, Van Tienderen PH. 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: Consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 212217.
  • Via S, Lande R. 1985. Genotype–environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39: 505522.
  • Waite S. 1994. Field evidence of plastic growth responses to habitat heterogeneity in the clonal herb Ranunculus repens. Ecological Research 9: 311316.
  • Watson MA, Geber MA, Jones CS. 1995. Ontogenetic contingency and the expression of plant plasticity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 474475.
  • Weiner J. 2004. Allocation, plasticity, and allometry in plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics 6: 207215.
  • West-Eberhard MJ. 2003. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
  • White J. 1979. The plant as a metapopulation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 109145.
  • Wilson SD. 2000. Heterogeneity, diversity and scale in plant communities. In: HutchingsMJ, JohnEA, StewartAJA, eds. The Ecological Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 5369.
  • Winn AA. 1996a. Adaptation to fine-grained environmental variation: An analysis of within-individual leaf variation in an annual plant. Evolution 50: 11111118.
  • Winn AA. 1996b. The contributions of programmed developmental change and phenotypic plasticity to within-individual variation in leaf traits in Dicerandra linearifolia. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9: 737752.
  • Young TP, Hubbell SP. 1991. Crown asymmetry, treefalls, and repeat disturbance of tropical forest gaps. Ecology 72: 14641471.