SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Fisher JB. 1992. How predictive are computer simulations of tree architecture?. International Journal of Plant Science 153: S137S146.
  • Fournier C, Andrieu B. 1998. A 3D architectural and process-based model of maize development. Annals of Botany 81: 233250.
  • Godin C, Guedon Y, Costes E. 1999. Exploration of a plant architecture database with the Amapmod software illustrated on an apple tree hybrid family. Agronomie, 19: 163184.
  • Godin C, Hanan J, Kurth W, Lacointe A, Takenaka A, Prusinkiewicz P, DeJong. T, Beveridge C, Andrieu B, eds. 2004. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models (FSPM04). Montpellier, France: UMR AMAP, CIRAD.
  • Grimm V. 1994. Mathematical models and understanding in ecology. Ecological Modelling 75/76: 641651.
  • Haefner JW. 1996. Modeling Biological Systems: Principles and Applications. New York, USA: Chapman & Hall.
  • Hallé FR, Oldeman AA, Tomlinson PB. 1978. Tropical Trees and Forests: an Architectural Analysis. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Hanan J. 2004. Modelling cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) with l-systems: A template model for incorporating physiology. In: GodinC, HananJ, KurthW, LacointeA, TakenakaA, PrusinkiewiczP, DeJong.T, BeveridgeC, AndrieuB, eds. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models (FSPM04). Montpellier, France: UMR AMAP, CIRAD.
  • Hanan JS, Hearn AB. 2002. Linking physiological and architectural models of cotton. Agricultural Systems 75: 4777.
  • Hayes PA, Steeves TA, Neal BR. 1990. An architectural analysis of Shepherdia canadensis and Shepherdia argentea (Elaeagnaceae): the architectural models. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 719725.
  • Kaitaniemi P. 2000. A canonical model of tree resource allocation after defoliation and bud consumption. Ecological Modelling 129: 259272.
  • Kurth W, Sloboda B. 1997. Growth grammars simulating trees – an extension of Lsystems incorporating local variables and sensitivity. Silva Fennica 31: 285295.
  • Lacointe A. 2000. Carbon allocation among tree organs: A review of basic processes and representation in functional-structural tree models. Annals of Forest Science 57: 521533.
  • Le Roux X, Lacointe A, Escobar-Gutierrez A, Le Dizès S. 2001. Carbon-based models of individual tree growth: a critical appraisal. Annals of Forest Science 58: 469506.
  • Lindenmayer A. 1968. Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development, Parts I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 18: 280315.
  • Lindenmayer A, Prusinkiewicz P. 1990. The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag.
  • Marcelis LFM. 2001. Yield and quality prediction of vegetables: the case of cucumber. In: Tijskens, L, Hertog, M, Nicolai, B, eds. Food Process Modelling. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 183200.
  • Martin PG. 1997. The use of canonical S-system modelling for condensation of complex dynamic models. Ecological Modelling 103: 4370.
  • Perttunen J, Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E. 1998. LIGNUM: a model combining the structure and the functioning of trees. Ecological Modelling 108: 189198.
  • Prusinkiewicz P. 1998. Modelling of spatial structure and development of plants: a review. Scientia Horticulturae 74: 113149.
  • De Reffye P, Fourcaud T, Blaise F, Barthelemy D, Houllier F. 1997. A functional model of tree growth and tree architecture. Silva Fennica 31: 297311.
  • Renton M. 2004. Function, Form and Frangipanis: Modelling the Patterns of Plant Growth. PhD Thesis. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Renton M, Hanan J, Kaitaniemi P. 2005. Functional-structural plant modelling using a combination of architectural analysis, 1-systems and a canonical model of function. Ecological Modelling. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.10.008
  • Renton M, Hanan J, Kaitaniemi P. 2003. The inside story: including physiology in structural plant models. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Graphics, Interactive Techniques in Australasia, South-East Asia. (GRAPHITE2003). New York, USA: ACM Press, 95102.
  • Room P, Hanan J, Prusinkiewicz P. 1996. Virtual plants: new perspectives for ecologists, pathologists and agricultural scientists. Trends in Plant Science 1: 3338.
  • Sachs T, Novoplansky A. 1995. Tree form: architectural models do not suffice. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 43: 203212.
  • Savageau MA. 1969. Biochemical systems analysis. I. Some mathematical properties of the rate law for the component enzymatic reactions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 25: 365369.
  • Savageau MA. 1976. Biochemical Systems Analysis: A. Study of Function and Design in Molecular Biology. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Savageau MA. 1980. Growth equations: a general equation and a survey of special cases. Mathematical Biosciences 48: 267278.
  • Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, Nygren P, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Perttunen J, Hakula H. 2000. Components of functional-structural tree models. Annals of Forest Science 57: 399412.
  • Sinoquet H, Le Roux X. 2000. Short term interactions between tree foliage and the aerial environment: An overview of modelling approaches available for tree structure-function models. Annals of Forest Science 57: 477496.
  • Suzuki A. 2000. Patterns of vegetative growth and reproduction in relation to branch orders: the plant as a spatially structured population. Trees-Structure and Function, 14: 329333.
  • Thornby D. 2004. Using Computational Tools to Investigate the Responses of Cotton. Plants (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) to Defoliation. PhD Thesis. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Thornby D, Renton M, Hanan J. 2003. Using computational plant science tools to investigate morphological aspects of compensatory growth. Lecture Notes In Computer Science 2660: 708717.
  • Thornley JHM, Johnson IR. 1990. Plant and Crop Modelling. A Mathematical Approach to Plant and Crop Physiology. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  • Torres NV. 1996. S-system modelling approach to ecosystem: application to a study of magnesium flow in a tropical forest. Ecological Modelling 89: 109120.
  • Voit EO. 1988. Dynamics of self-thinning tree stands. Annals of Botany 62: 6778.
  • Voit EO. 1991. Canonical Non-linear Modelling: S-System Approach to Understanding Complexity. New York, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Voit EO. 1993. S-system modelling of complex systems with chaotic input. Environmetrics 4: 153186.
  • Voit EO. 2000. Computational Analysis of Biochemical Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Voit EO, Sands PJ. 1996a. Modelling forest growth I. Canonical approach. Ecological Modelling 86: 5171.
  • Voit EO, Sands PJ. 1996b. Modelling forest growth II. Biomass partitioning in Scots pine. Ecological Modelling 86: 7389.