SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerly DD. 1996. Canopy structure and dynamics: integration of growth processes in tropical pioneer trees. In: MulkeySS, ChazdonRL, SmithAP, eds. Tropical Forest Plant Ecophysiology. New York, USA: Chapman & Hall, 619658.
  • Amthor JS. 2000. The McCree-deWit-Penning de Vries-Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later. Annals of Botany 86: 120.
  • Aono M, Kunii TL. 1984. Botanical tree image generation. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 4: 1034.
  • Bartelink H. 1997. Simulation of Growth and Competition in Mixed Stands of Douglas-Fir and Beech. PhD Thesis, Ponser & Looijen, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • Bell AD. 1991. Plant Form, an Illustrated Guide to Flowering Plant Morphology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Bongers F, Popma J. 1990. Leaf characteristics of the tropical rain forest flora of los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Botanical Gazette 151: 354365.
  • Boojh R, Ramakrishnan PS. 1982. Growth strategy of trees related to successional status II. Leaf dynamics. Forest Ecology and Management 4: 374386.
  • Brown CM, McAlpine RG, Kormanik PP. 1967. Apical dominance and form in woody plants: a reappraisal. American Journal of Botany 54: 153162.
  • Campbell GS. 1977. An Introduction to Environmental Physics. New York, USA: Springer
  • Chabot BF, Hicks DJ. 1982. The ecology of leaf life spans. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 13: 229259.
  • Chazdon RL. 1986. The costs of leaf support in understory palms -economy versus safety. American Naturalist 127: 930.
  • Chazdon RL. 1988. Sunflecks and their importance to understorey plants. Advances in Ecological Research 18: 163.
  • Chazdon RL, Fetcher N. 1984. Light environments of tropical forests. In: MedinaE, MooneyHA, Vasquez-YanesC, eds. Physiological Ecology of Plant of the Wet Tropics. The Hague, the Netherlands: W. Junk, 2736.
  • Clark DA, Clark DB. 1992. Life history diversity of canopy and emergent trees in a Neotropical rain forest. Ecological Monographs 62: 315344.
  • Cline MG. 1997. Concepts and terminology of apical dominance. American Journal of Botany 84: 10641069.
  • Coen E. 2004. From genes to morphogenesis. In: GodinC, HananJ, KurthW, LacointeA, TakenakaA, PruskinkiewiczP, DeJongT, BeveridgeC, AndrieuB, eds. 4th International Workshop on Functional–Structural Plant Models. Montpellier, France: Proceedings UMR & AMAP.
  • Coley PD. 1988. Effect of plant growth rate and leaf lifetime on the amount and type of anti-herbivore defense. Oecologia 74: 531536.
  • Ellsworth DS, Reich PB. 1993. Canopy structure and vertical patterns of photosynthesis and related leaf traits in a deciduous forest. Oecologia 96: 169178.
  • Enquist BJ. 2002. Universal scaling in tree and vascular plant allometry: toward a general quantitative theory of linking plant form and function from cells to ecosystems. Tree Physiologist 22: 10451064.
  • Finegan B. 1996. Pattern and process in neotropical secondary rain forests: the first 100 years of succession. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 119124.
  • Franco M. 1985. A modular approach to tree production. In: WhiteJ, ed. Studies on Plant Demography: a Festschrift to John L. Harper. London, UK: Academic Press, 257272.
  • Gifford RM. 2003. Plant respiration in productivity models: conceptualization, representation and issues for global terrestrial carbon-cycle research. Functional Plant Biology 30: 171186.
  • Givnish TJ. 1988. Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole-plant perspective. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15: 6392.
  • Goudriaan J. 1977. Crop Micrometeorology: a Simulation Study. PhD Thesis, Pudoc, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • Hallé F, Oldeman RAA, Tomlinson PB. 1978. Tropical Trees and Forests. An Architectural Analysis. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  • Horn HS. 1971. The Adaptive Geometry of Trees. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
  • Johnson IR, Thornley JHM. 1984. A model of instantaneous and daily canopy photosynthesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 107: 531545.
  • Kikuzawa K. 1991. A Cost-benefit analysis of leaf habit and leaf longevity of trees and their geographical pattern. American Naturalist 138: 12501263.
  • King DA. 1991a. Correlations between biomass allocation, relative growth rate and light environment in tropical forest saplings. Functional Ecology 5: 485492.
  • King DA. 1991b. Tree size. National Geographyraphical Research and Exploration 7: 342351.
  • King DA. 1994. Influence of light level on the growth and morphology of saplings in Panamanian forest. American Journal of Botany 81: 948957.
  • Kira T. 1978. Community architecture and organic matter dynamics in tropical lowland rain forests of southeast Asia with special reference to Pasoh forest, West Malaysia. In: TomlinsonPB, ZimmermannMH, eds. Tropical Trees as Living Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 561590.
  • Kira T, Shinozaki KK, Hozumi K. 1969. Structure of forest canopies as related to their primary productivity. Plant Cell Physiology 10: 129142.
  • Kitajima K. 1994. Relative importance of photosynthetic traits and allocation patterns as correlates of seedling shade tolerance of 13 tropical trees. Oecologia 98: 419428.
  • Kobe RK, Paccala SW, Silander JA, Canham CD. 1995. Juvenile tree survivorship as a component of shade tolerance. Ecological Applications 3: 517532.
  • Kohyama T, Hotta M. 1990. Significance of allometry in tropical saplings. Functional Ecology 4: 515521.
  • Koop H, Sterck FJ. 1994. Light penetration through structurally complex forest canopies: an example of a lowland tropical rain forest. Forest Ecology and Management 69: 111122.
  • Kramer EM, Borkowksi MH. 2004. Wood grain patterns at branch junctions: modeling and implications. Trees: Structure and Function 18: 493500.
  • Kramer PJ, Kozlowski TT. 1979. Physiology of Woody Plants. New York, USA: Academic Press.
  • Lieberman M, Lieberman D. 1994. Patterns of density and dispersion of forest trees. In: McDadeLA, BawaKS, HespenheideHA, HartshornGS, eds. La Selva: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Rain Forest. London, UK: Chicago Press, 106199.
  • Mäkelä A. 1986. Implications of the pipe model theory on dry matter partitioning and height growth in trees. Journal of Theoretical Biology 123: 103120.
  • Mäkelä A. 2003. Process-based modeling of tree and stand growth: towards a hierarchical treatment of multi-scale processes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33: 398409.
  • Mäkelä A, Perttunen J, Nikinmaa E, Sievänen R. 2004. Two–way interactions between process-based tree growth models and 3D structural-functional models – lessons learned from a scaling exercise. In: GodinC, HananJ, KurthW, LacointeA, TakenakaA, PruskinkiewiczP, DeJongT, BeveridgeC, AndrieuB, eds. 4th International Workshop on Functional–Structural Plant Models. Montpellier, France: Proceedings UMR & AMAP.
  • Mattheck CI. 1991. Trees: the Mechanical Design. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Mech R, Prusinkiewicz P. 1996. Visual models of plant interacting with their environment. Computer Graphics Proceedings,Annual Conference Series: 397–410.
  • Van Der Meer P. 1995. Canopy Dynamics of a Tropical Rain Forest in French Guiana. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • Monteith JL, Unsworth MH. 1991. Principles of Environmental Physics. London, UK: Arnold Publishers.
  • Montgomery RA, Chazdon RL. 2001. Forest structure, canopy architecture, and light transmittance in tropical wet forests. Ecology 82: 27072718.
  • Morgan J, Cannell MGR. 1987. Structural analysis of tree trunks and branches: tapered cantilever beams subject to large deflections under complex loading. Tree Physiology 3: 365374.
  • Niklas KJ. 1994. Plant Allometry: the Scaling of Form and Process. London, UK: The. University of Chicago Press.
  • Paccala SW, Canham CD, Saponara J, Silander J, Kobe RK, Ribbens E. 1996. Forest models defined by field measurements: estimation, error analysis and dynamics. Ecological Monographs 66: 143.
  • Pearcy RW, Yang W. 1996. A three-dimensional crown architecture model for assessment of light capture and carbon gain by understory plants. Oecologia 108: 112.
  • Penning de Vries FWT. 1975. The costs of maintenance processes in plants. Annals of Botany 39: 7792.
  • Perttunen J, Sievanen R, Nikinmaa E, Salminen H, Saarenmaa H, Vakeva J. 1996. Lignum: a tree model based on simple structural units. Annals of Botany 77: 8798.
  • Poorter L, Bongers F, Sterck FJ, Wöll H. 2003. Architecture of 53 rain forest tree species differing in adult stature and shade tolerance. Ecology 84: 602608.
  • Poorter H, Villar R. 1997. The fate of acquired carbon in plants: chemical composition and construction costs. In: BazzazFA, GraceJ, eds. Plant Resource Allocation. New York, USA: Academic Press, 3972.
  • Prusinkiewicz P, Lindenmayer A. 1990. The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. New York, USA: Springer.
  • Prusinkiewicz P, Remphrey WR. 2000. Characterization of architectural tree models using l-systems and Petri nets. In: LabrecqueM, ed. L’arbre – the Tree 2000, 177186.
  • Raaijmakers D. 1994. Growth of Tropical Rain Forest Trees as Dependent on Phosphorous Supply. Tropenbos Series 11. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Tropenbos Foundation.
  • Reich PB, Uhl C, Walters MB, Prugh L, Ellsworth DS. 1991. Leaf lifespan as a determinant of leaf structure and function among 23 Amazonian tree species. Oecologia 86: 1624.
  • Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS. 1992. Leaf life span in relation to leaf plant and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecological Monographs 62: 365392.
  • Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cavender-Bares J, Craine JM, Oleksyn J, Westoby M, Walters MB. 2003. The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: S143S164.
  • Reyes G, Brown S, Chapman J. 1992. Wood densities of tropical trees. New Orleans, LA, USA: Southern Forest Experiment Station.
  • Richards PW. 1996. The Tropical Rain Forest, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rijkers T. 2000. Leaf Function in Tropical Rain Forest Canopies. PhD Thesis, Ponser & Looijen, Wageningen.
  • Room PM, Maillette L, Hanan JS. 1994. Modular and metamer dynamics and virtual plants. Advances in Ecological Research 25: 105157.
  • Russel G, Jarvis PG, Monteith JL. 1989. Absorption of radiation by canopies and stand growth. In: RusselGB, MarhsallB, JarvisPJ, eds. Plant Canopies: Their Growth, Form and Function. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2140.
  • Ryan MG, Waring RH. 1992. Maintenance respiration and stand development in a subalpine lodgepole pine forest. Ecology 73: 21002108.
  • Shinozaki KK, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T. 1964. A quantitative analysis of plant form – the pipeline model theory I. Basic analysis. Japanese Journal of Ecology 14: 133139.
  • Sinoquet H, Phattaralerphong J, Kasemsap P, Thanisawanyangkura S. 2004. Light and carbon acquisition partitioning between flushes of two-year-old mango trees. Montpellier, France: Proceedings FSPM04.
  • Sorrensen-Cothern KA, Ford ED, Sprugel DG. 1993. A model of competition incorporating plasticity through modular foliage and crown development. Ecological Monographs 63: 277304.
  • Sprugel DG. 2002. When branch autonomy fails: Milton's Law of resource availability and allocation. Tree Physiologist 22: 11191124.
  • Sterck FJ. 1999. Crown development in tropical rain forest trees in gaps and understorey. Plant Ecology 143: 8998.
  • Sterck FJ. 2004. Woody architecture. In: TurnbullC, ed. Annual Plant Reviews: Plant Architecture and its Manipulation. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell Science, 208236.
  • Sterck FJ, Bongers F. 2001. Crown development in tropical rain forest trees: patterns with light availability and tree height. Journal of Ecology 89: 113.
  • Sterck FJ, Bongers F, During HJ, Martínez-Ramos M, De Kroon H. 2003. Module responses in a tropical forest tree analyzed with a matrix model. Ecology 84: 27512761.
  • Sterck FJ, Bongers F, Newbery DM. 2001. Tree architecture in a Bornean lowland rain forest: intra-specific and inter-specific patterns. Plant Ecology 153: 279292.
  • Stoll P, Schmid B. 1998. Plant foraging and dynamic competition between branches of Pinus sylvestris in contrasting light environments. Journal of Ecology 86: 341354.
  • Valladares F, Stillman JB, Pearcy RW. 2002. Convergence in light capture efficiencies among tropical forest understorey plants with contrasting crown architectures: a case of morphological compensation. American Journal of Botany 89: 12751284.
  • Valladares F, Wright SJ, Lasso E, Kitajima K, Pearcy RW. 2000. Plastic phenotypic response to light of 16 congeneric shrubs from a Panamanian rainforest. Ecology 81: 19251936.
  • Veneklaas EJ, Poorter L. 1998. Growth and carbon partitioning of tropical tree seedlings growing in contrasting light environments. In: LambersH, PoorterH, Van VuurenMI, eds. Inherent Variation in Plant Growth. Physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Leiden, the Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers, 337361.
  • Warren-Wilson W. 1981. Analysis of light interception by a single plant. Annals of Botany 48: 501505.
  • Watson MA, Casper BB. 1984. Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 233258.
  • West GB, Brown JM, Enquist BJ. 1999. A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature 400: 664667.
  • Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ. 2002. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 33: 125159.
  • White J. 1979. The plant as a metapopulation. Annual Revue of Ecology and Systematics 10: 109145.
  • Williams K, Field CB, Mooney HA. 1989. Relationships among leaf construction cost, leaf longevity, and light environment in rain-forest plants of the genus Piper. American Naturalist 133: 198211.
  • Wilson BF. 2000. Apical control of branch growth and angle in woody plants. American Journal of Botany 87: 601607.
  • Wright IJ, Reich RB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas ML, Niinemets U, Oleksyn ML, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet K, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R. 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428: 821827.
  • Yoda K. 1974. Three dimensional distribution of light intensity in a tropical rain forest of West Malaysia. Japanese Journal of Ecology 24: 247254.