SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Agrawal AA, Strauss SY, Stout MJ. 1999. Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution 53: 10931104.
  • Arendt JD. 1997. Adaptive intrinsic growth rates: an integration across taxa. Quarterly Review of Biology 72: 149177.
  • Baldwin IT. 1999. Inducible nicotine production in native Nicotiana as an example of adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25: 330.
  • Bell DL, Sultan SE. 1999. Dynamic phenotypic plasticity for root growth in Polygonum: a comparative study. American Journal of Botany 86: 807819.
  • Bond BJ. 2000. Age-related changes in photosynthesis of woody plants. Trends in Plant Science 5: 349353.
  • Causin HF, Wulff RD. 2003. Changes in the response to light quality during ontogeny in Chenopodium album. Canadian Journal of Botany 81: 152163.
  • Chapin FS III, Autumn K, Pugnaire F. 1993. Evolution of suites of traits in response to environmental stress. American Naturalist 142: S78S92.
  • Chapin FS III, Bloom AJ, Field CB, Waring RH. 1987. Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. Bioscience 37: 4957.
  • Chapin FS III, Schulze E, Mooney HA. 1990. The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21: 423447.
  • Coleman JS, McConnaughay KDM. 1995. A non-functional interpretation of a classical optimal-partitioning example. Functional Ecology 9: 951954.
  • Coleman JS, McConnaughay KDM, Ackerly DD. 1994. Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 187191.
  • Dorn LA, Pyle EH, Schmitt J. 2000. Plasticity to light cues and resources in Arabidopsis thaliana: testing for adaptive value and costs. Evolution 54: 19821994.
  • Dudley SA, Schmitt J. 1996. Testing the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: density dependent selection on manipulated stem length in Impatiens capensis. American Naturalist 147: 445465.
  • Evans GC. 1972. The Quantitative Analysis of Plant Growth. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
  • Farnsworth E. 2004. Hormones and shifting ecology throughout plant development. Ecology 85: 515.
  • Fernald ML. 1970. Grays Manual of Botany. New York, USA: D. van Nostrand.
  • Fox GA. 1993. Failure-time analysis: emergence, flowering, survivorship, and other waiting times. In: Scheiner, SM, Gurevitch, J, eds. Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. New York, USA: Chapman & Hall, 253289.
  • Gedroc JJ, McConnaughay KDM, Coleman JS. 1996. Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic, or both? Functional Ecology 10: 4450.
  • Gilbert SF. 2001. Ecological developmental biology: developmental biology meets the real world. Developmental Biology 233: 112.
  • Gomez JM. 2003. Herbivory reduces the strength of pollinator-mediated selection in the Mediterranean herb Erysimum mediohispanicum: consequences for plant specialization. American Naturalist 162: 242256.
  • Gunn S, Bailey SJ, Farrar JF. 1999. Partitioning of dry mass and leaf area within plants of three species grown at elevated CO2. Functional Ecology 13: S3S11.
  • Haag JJ, Coupe MD, Cahill JF, Jr. 2004. Antagonistic interactions between competition and insect herbivory on plant growth. Journal of Ecology 92: 156167.
  • Huber H, Kane NC, Heschel MS, Von Wettberg EJ, Banta J, Leuck A, Schmitt J. 2004. Frequency and microenvironmental pattern of selection on plastic shade-avoidance traits in a natural population of Impatiens capensis. American Naturalist 163: 548563.
  • Huitema BE. 1980. The Analysis of Covariance and Alternatives. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kikuzawa K. 1995. The basis for variation in leaf longevity of plants. Vegetatio 121: 89100.
  • Knight H, Knight MR. 2001. Abiotic stress signaling pathways: specificity and cross-talk. Trends in Plant Science 6: 262267.
  • Lambers H, Poorter H. 1992. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Advances in Ecological Research 23: 188242.
  • Lee ET, Wang JW. 2003. Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • McConnaughay KDM, Coleman JS. 1998. Can plants track changes in nutrient availability via changes in biomass partitioning? Plant and Soil 202: 201209.
  • McConnaughay KDM, Coleman JS. 1999. Biomass allocation in plants: ontogenetic or optimality? A test along three resource gradients. Ecology 80: 25812593.
  • Niinemets Ü. 2004. Adaptive adjustments to light in foliage and whole-plant characteristics depend on relative age in the perennial herb Leontodon hispidus. New Phytologist 162: 683696.
  • SAS. 1999. SAS/STAT Users Guide. Cary, USA: SAS Institute.
  • Stanton ML, Roy BA, Thiede DA. 2000. Evolution in stressful environments. I. phenotypic variability, phenotypic selection, and response to selection in five distinct environmental stresses. Evolution 54: 93111.
  • Steinger T, Roy BA, Stanton ML. 2003. Evolution in stressful environments II: adaptive value and costs of plasticity in response to low light in Sinapis arvensis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 313323.
  • Weinig C. 2000. Differing selection in alternative competitive environments: shade-avoidance responses and germination timing. Evolution 54: 124136.
  • Weinig C, Delph LF. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity early in life constrains developmental response later. Evolution 55: 930936.
  • Winn AA. 1999. The functional significance and fitness consequences of heterophylly. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: S113S121.
  • Wright SD, McConnaughay KDM. 2002. Interpreting phenotypic plasticity: the importance of ontogeny. Plant Species Biology 17: 119131.
    Direct Link:
  • Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR. 1990. Furanocoumarin induction in wild parsnip: genetics and population variation. Ecology 71: 19331940.
  • Zhu J-K. 2002. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 53: 247273.