SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Basile B, Marsal J, DeJong TM. 2003. Daily shoot extension growth of peach trees growing on rootstocks that reduce scion growth is related to daily dynamics of stem water potential. Tree Physiology 23: 695704.
  • Berman ME, DeJong TM. 1997. Diurnal patterns of stem extension growth in peach (Prunus persica): temperature and fluctuations in water status determine growth rate. Physiologia Plantarum 100: 361370.
  • Bidel LPR, Pages L, Riviere LM, Pelloux G, Lorendeau JY. 2000. MassFlowDyn I: a carbon transport and partitioning model for root system architecture. Annals of Botany 85: 869886.
  • Bradford KJ, Hsiao TC. 1982. Physiological responses to moderate water stress. In: LangeOL, NobelPS, OsmondCB, ZieglerH, eds. Physiological Plant Ecology II. Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 263324.
  • Brouwer R. 1983. Functional equilibrium: sense or nonsense? Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 31: 335348.
  • DeJong TM, Grossman YL. 1995. Quantifying sink and source limitations on dry matter partitioning to fruit growth in peach trees. Physiologia Plantarum 95: 437443.
  • Farrar JF. 1993. Sink strength: what is it and how do we measure it? Plant, Cell & Environment 16: 1015.
  • Farrar J, Gunn S. 1998. Allocation: allometry, acclimation – and alchemy? In: LambersH, PoorterH and Van VurenMMI, eds. Physiological Mechanisms and Ecological Consequences. Leiden, the Netherlands: Backhuys, 183198.
  • Federl P, Prusinkiewicz P. 2004. Solving differential equations in developmental models of multicellular structures expressed using L-systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3037: 6572.
  • Gifford RM, Evans LT. 1981. Photosynthesis, carbon partitioning and yield. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 32: 485509.
  • Grossman YL, DeJong TM. 1994. PEACH: a simulation model of reproductive and vegetative growth in peach trees. Tree Physiology 14: 329345.
  • Grossman YL, DeJong TM. 1995a. Maximum fruit growth potential and seasonal patterns of resource dynamics during peach growth. Annals of Botany 75: 553560.
  • Grossman YL, DeJong TM. 1995b. Maximum fruit growth potential following resource limitation during peach growth. Annals of Botany 75: 561567.
  • Grossman YL, DeJong TM. 1995c. Maximum vegetative growth potential and seasonal patterns of resource dynamics during peach growth. Annals of Botany 76: 473482.
  • Karwowski R, Prusinkiewicz P. 2003. Design and implementation of the L+C modeling language. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 86: 19p.
  • Lacointe A. 2000. Carbon allocation among tree organs: a review of basic processes and representation in functional–structural models. Annals of Forest Science 57: 521534.
  • Lacointe A, Isebrands JG, Host GE. 2002. A new way to account for the effect of source–sink spatial relationships in whole plant carbon allocation models. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32: 18381848.
  • Le Dizès S, Cruiziat P, Lacointe A, Sinoquet H, Le Roux X, Balandier P, Jacquet P. 1997. A model for simulating structure–function relationships in walnut tree growth processes. Silva Fennica 31: 313328.
  • Le Roux X, Lacointe A, Escobar-Gutiérrez A, LeDizès S. 2001. Carbon-based models of individual tree growth: a critical appraisal. Annals of Forest Science 58: 469506.
  • Lindenmayer A. 1968. Mathematical models of cellular interaction in development, Parts I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 18: 280315.
  • Loescher WH, McCamant T, Keller JD. 1990. Carbohydrate reserves, translocation and storage in woody plant roots. Hortscience 25: 274281.
  • Loomis RS, Rabbinge R, Ng E. 1979. Explanatory models in crop physiology. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 30: 339367.
  • Mech R, Prusinkiewicz P. 1996. Visual models of plants interacting with their environment. In: Rusheimer H, ed. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1996. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series 1996. ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, USA: 397410.
  • Minchin PEH, Thorpe MR, Farrar JF. 1993. A simple mechanistic model of phloem transport which explains sink priority. Journal of Experimental Botany 44: 947955.
  • Niklas KJ, Enquist BJ. 2002. Canonical rules for plant organ biomass partitioning and annual allocation. American Journal of Botany 89: 812819.
  • Perttunen J, Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, Salminen H, Saarenmaa H, Väkevä J. 1996. Lignum: a tree model based on simple structural units. Annals of Botany 77: 8798.
  • Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. 1992. Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Prusinkiewicz P. 2004. Art and science for life: designing and growing virtual plants with L-systems. Acta Horticulturae 630: 1528.
  • Prusinkiewicz P, Lindenmayer A. 1990. The Algrithmic Beauty of Plants. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Rosati A, DeJong TM. 2003. Estimating photosynthetic radiation use efficiency using incident light and photosynthesis of individual leaves. Annals of Botany 91: 869877.
  • Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T. 1964. A quantitative analysis of plant form – the pipe model theory. I. Basic analyses. Japanese Journal of Botany 14: 97104.
  • Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, Nygren P, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Perttunen J, Hakula H. 2000. Components of functional–structural tree models. Annals of Forestry Science 57: 399412.
  • Thornley JHM, Johnson IR. 1990. Plant and Crop Modeling: A Mathematical Approach to Plant and Crop Physiology. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  • Valentine HT. 1985. Tree growth models: derivations employing the pipe model theory. Journal of Theoretical Biology 117: 579585.
  • Warren-Wilson J. 1967. Ecological data on dry-matter production by plants and plant communities. In: BradleyEF, DenmeadOT, eds. The Collection and Processing of Field Data. Sydney: Interscience, 77123.