SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ashman TL, Knight TM, Steets JA, Amarasekare P, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mazer SJ, Mitchell RJ, Morgan MT, Wilson WG. 2004. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85: 24082421.
  • Barrett SCH. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 358: 9911004.
  • Barrett SCH, Harder LD, Worley AC. 1996. The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 352: 12711280.
  • Burd M. 1994. Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Botanical Review 60: 83139.
  • Burd M. 1998. ‘Excess’ flower production and selective fruit abortion: a model of potential benefits. Ecology 79: 21232132.
  • Burd M, Callahan HS. 2000. What does the male function hypothesis claim? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 735742.
  • Byers DL, Waller DM. 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 479513.
  • Campbell RB. 1986. The interdependence of mating structure and inbreeding depression. Theoretical Population Biology 30: 232244.
  • Casper BB. 1988. Evidence for selective embryo abortion in Cryptantha flava. American Naturalist 132: 318326.
  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Bodmer WF. 1999. The Genetics of Human Populations. Mineola, NY, USA: Dover Publications.
  • Charlesworth D. 1989. Why do plants produce so many more ovules than seeds? Nature 338: 2122.
  • Charlesworth B. 1994. The evolution of lethals in the t-haplotype system of the mouse. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 258: 101107.
  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237268.
  • Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 1999. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genetical Research 74: 329340.
  • Charlesworth D, Morgan MT, Charlesworth B. 1990. Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44: 14691489.
  • Cheptou PO, Dieckmann U. 2002. The evolution of self-fertilization in density-regulated populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269: 11771186.
  • Cheptou PO, Mathias A. 2001. Can varying inbreeding depression select for intermediary selfing rates? American Naturalist 157: 361373.
  • Damgaard D, Couvet D, Loeschke V. 1992. Partial selfing as an optimal mating strategy. Heredity 69: 289295.
  • Diamond JM. 1987. Causes of death before birth. Nature 329: 487488.
  • Dieckmann U. 1997. Can adaptive dynamics invade? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 128131.
  • Fisher RA. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Annals of Eugenics 11: 5363.
  • Haig D. 1992. Brood reduction in gymnosperms. In: ElgarMA, CrespiBJ, eds. Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution among Diverse Taxa. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 6384.
  • Hastings IM. 2000. Models of human genetic disease: how biased are the standard formulae? Genetical Research 75: 107114.
  • Hastings IM. 2001. Reproductive compensation and human genetic disease. Genetical Research 77: 277283.
  • Hedrick PW, Savolainen O, Kärkkäinen K. 1999. Factors influencing the extent of inbreeding depression: an example from Scots pine. Heredity 82: 441450.
  • Holsinger KE. 1986. Dispersal and plant mating systems. The evolution of self-fertilization in subdivided populations. Evolution 40: 405413.
  • Holsinger KE. 1991. Mass-action models of plant mating systems: the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. American Naturalist 138: 606622.
  • Husband BC, Schemske DW. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 5470.
  • Johnston MO. 1992. Effect of cross and self-fertilization on progeny fitness in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica. Evolution 46: 688702.
  • Johnston MO. 1998. Evolution of intermediate selfing rates in plants: pollination ecology versus deleterious mutations. Genetica 102/103: 267278.
  • Kärkkäinen K, Savolainen O. 1993. The degree of early inbreeding depression determines the selfing rate at the seed stage: model and results from Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine). Heredity 71: 160166.
  • Klekowski EJ Jr. 1982. Genetic load and soft selection in ferns. Heredity 49: 191197.
  • Klekowski EJ Jr, Godfrey PJ. 1989. Ageing and mutation in plants. Nature 340: 389391.
  • Kondrashov AS. 1985. Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. II. Facultative apomixis and selfing. Genetics 111: 635653.
  • Korbecka G, Klinkhamer PGL, Vrieling K. 2002. Selective embryo abortion hypothesis revisited – a molecular approach. Plant Biology 4: 298310.
  • Kozlowski J, Stearns SC. 1989. Hypothesis for the production of excess zygotes: models of bet-hedging and selective abortion. Evolution 43: 13691377.
  • Krebs SL, Hancock JF. 1991. Embryonic genetic load in the highbush blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum (Ericaceae). American Journal of Botany 78: 14271437.
  • Lande R, Schemske DW. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 1. Genetics models. Evolution 39: 2440.
  • Lande R, Schemske DW, Schultz ST. 1994. High inbreeding depression, selective interference among loci, and the threshold selfing rate for purging recessive lethal mutations. Evolution 48: 965978.
  • Larson BMH, Barrett SCH. 2000. A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69: 503520.
  • Latta RG. 1995. The effects of embryo competition with mixed mating on the genetic load in plants. Heredity 75: 635643.
  • Latta RG, Ritland KR. 1994. Conditions favoring stable mixed mating systems with jointly evolving inbreeding depression. Journal of Theoretical Biology 170: 1523.
  • Lee TD. 1988. Patterns of fruit and seed production. In: Lovett DoustJ, Lovett DoustL, eds. Plant Reproductive Ecology: Patterns and Strategies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 179202.
  • Lloyd DG. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the evolution of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113: 6779.
  • Lloyd DG. 1980. Sexual strategies in plants. I. An hypothesis of serial adjustment of maternal investment during one reproductive season. New Phytologist 86: 6979.
  • Lloyd DG. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. International Journal of Plant Science 153: 370380.
  • Lynch M, Walsh B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Melser C, Klinkhamer PGL. 2001. Selective seed abortion increases offspring survival in Cynoglossum officinale (Boraginaceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 10331040.
  • Overall ADJ, Ahmad M, Nichols RA. 2002. The effects of reproductive compensation on recessive disorders within consanguineous human populations. Heredity 88: 474479.
  • Porcher E, Lande R. 2005a. Loss of gametophytic self-incompatibility with evolution of inbreeding depression. Evolution 59: 4660.
  • Porcher E, Lande R. 2005b. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression under pollen discounting and pollen limitation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. (In press.)
  • Ramsey M, Vaughton G. 1998. Effect of environment on the magnitude of inbreeding depression in seed germination in a partially self-fertile perennial herb (Blanfordia grandiflora, Liliaceae). International Journal of Plant Science 159: 98104.
  • Schemske DW, Lande R. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 2. Empirical observations. Evolution 39: 4152.
  • Simmons MJ, Crow JF. 1977. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annual Review of Genetics 11: 4978.
  • Sorensen FC. 1982. The roles of polyembryony and embryo viability in the genetic system of conifers. Evolution 36: 725733.
  • Stephenson AG. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 253279.
  • Sutherland S. 1987. Why hermaphroditic plants produce many more flowers than fruit: experimental tests with Agave mckelveyana. Evolution 41: 750759.
  • Uma Shaanker R, Ganeshaiah KN. 1996. Polyembryony in plants: a weapon in the war over offspring numbers? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 2627.
  • Uma Shaanker R, Ganeshaiah KN, Bawa KS. 1988. Parent–offspring conflict, sibling rivalry, and brood size patterns in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19: 177205.
  • Uyenoyama MK. 1986. Inbreeding depression and the cost of meiosis: the evolution of selfing in population practising biparental inbreeding. Evolution 40: 388404.
  • Vogler DW, Kalisz S. 2001. Sex among the flowers: the distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution 55: 202204.
  • Wiens D. 1984. Ovule survivorship, brood size, life history, breeding systems, and reproductive success in plants. Oecologia 64: 4753.
  • Wiens D, Calvin CL, Wilson CA, Davern CI, Frank D, Seavey SR. 1987. Reproductive success, spontaneous embryo abortion, and genetic load in flowering plants. Oecologia 71: 501509.
  • Wiens D, Nickrent DL, Davern CI, Calvin CL, Vivrette LJ. 1989. Developmental failure and loss of reproductive capacity in the rare paleoendemic shrub Dedeckera eurekensis. Nature 338: 6567.