SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Banfield WM. 1938. The relation of sap flow, vessel length and spore distribution to development of Dutch elm disease in American elm. Phytopathology 28: 3.
  • Banfield WM. 1941. Distribution by the sap stream of spores of three fungi that induce vascular wilt diseases of elm. Journal of Agricultural Research 62: 637681.
  • Banfield WM. 1968. Dutch elm disease recurrence and recovery in American elm. Phytopathologie Zeitschrift 62: 2160.
  • Brasier CM. 2000. Intercontinental spread and continuing evolution of the Dutch elm disease pathogens. In: DunnCP, ed. The Elms: Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 6172.
  • Brasier CM, Lea J, Rawlings MK. 1981. The aggressive and non-aggressive strains of Ceratocystis ulmi have different temperature optima for growth. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 76: 213218.
  • Campana RJ, Hyland F. 1974. Comparative size, number and distribution of vessels in roots and stems of American elm and factors in recurrence of Dutch elm disease. Proceedings of the American Phytopathological Society 1: 3031.
  • Carlquist S. 1977. Ecological factors in wood evolution: a floristic approach. American Journal of Botany 64: 87896.
  • Cogolludo-Agustín MA, Agúndez D, Gil L. 2000. Identification of native and hybrid elms in Spain using isozyme gene markers. Heredity 85: 157166.
  • Costa A, Pereira H, Oliveira A. 2003. Variability of radial growth in cork oak adult trees under cork production. Forest Ecology and Management 175: 239246.
  • Elgersma DM. 1967. Factors determining resistance of elms to Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 57: 641642.
  • Elgersma DM. 1970. Length and diameter of xylem vessels as a factors in resistance of elms to Ceratocystis ulmi. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 76: 179182.
  • Ellmore GS, Ewers FW. 1985. Hydraulic conductivity in trunk xylem of Elm, Ulmus americana. IAWA Bulletin 4: 303307.
  • Faccoli M, Battisti A. 1997. Observations on the transmission of Ophiostoma ulmi by the smaller elm bark beetles (Scolytus spp.). In: GregoireJC, LiebholdAM, StephenFM, DayKR, SalomSM, eds. Interacting Cultural Tactics Into the Management of Bark Beetle Reforestation Pests. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-236. Radnor, PA, USA: USDA, 172176.
  • Gibbs NJ. 2001. Vascular wilt diseases of trees – An Anglo-American perspective. In: AshCL, ed. Shade Tree Wilt Diseases. St Paul, MN, USA: American Phytopathological Society Press, 1528.
  • Giordano R, Salleo S, Wanderlingh F. 1978. Flow in xylem vessels and Poiseuille's law. Canadian Journal of Botany 56: 333338.
  • Gkinis A. 1977. Factors affecting resistance of elms to Dutch elm disease. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Gorsuch D, Oberbauer SF. 2002. Effects of mid-season frost and elevated growing season temperature on stomatal conductance and specific xylem conductivity of the artic shrub, Salix pulchra. Tree Physiology 22: 10271034.
  • Heybroek HM. 1979. Mini-monograph of elms in agroforestry, technical consultation on fast-growing broadleaved trees for Mediterranean and temperate zones. FAO, FO: FGB-79- 8/7: 423441.
  • Kuntz JE, Beckman CH, Riker AJ. 1952. Oak wilt development in relation to time and place of inoculation and concentration of inoculum. Phytopathology 42: 13.
  • López JC, Solla A, Menéndez Y, Iglesias S, Gil L. 2000. Escolítidos vectores de la grafiosis en Puerta de Hierro (Madrid) y Valsaín (Segovia) durante el período de 1996–99. Ecologia 14: 211217.
  • Lovisolo C, Schubert A. 1998. Effects of water stress on vessel size and xylem hydraulic conductivity in Vitis vinifera L. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 693700.
  • Mackenthun GL. 2004. The role of Ulmus laevis in German floodplain landscapes. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 5563.
  • McNabb HS, , ( Jr, ) Heybroek HM, McDonald WL. 1970. Anatomical factors in resistance to Dutch Elm Disease. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 76: 196204.
  • Melching JB, Sinclair WA. 1975. Hydraulic conductivity of stem internodes relates to resistance of American elms to Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 65: 643645.
  • Mittempergher L, Santini A. 2004. The history of elm breeding. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 161177.
  • Newbanks D, Bosh A, Zimmermann MH. 1983. Evidence for xylem dysfunction by embolization in Dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 73: 10601063.
  • Ouellette GB, Rioux D, Simard M, Cherif M. 2004. Ultrastructural and cytochemical studies of host and pathogens in some fungal wilt diseases: retro- and introspection towards a better understanding of DED. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 119145.
  • Pomerleau R. 1966. Relation of early cambial activity in white elm and infection by Ceratocystis ulmi (Buis.) C. Moreau. Canadian Journal of Botany 44: 109111 (Note).
  • Richards WC. 1993. Cerato-ulmin: a unique wilt toxin of instrumental importance in the development of Dutch elm disease. In: SticklenM, SheraldJ, eds. Dutch Elm Disease Research: Cellular and Molecular Approaches. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, 89151.
  • Richens RH. 1983. Elm. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Santini A, Ghelardini L, Falusi M, Bohnens J, Burón M, Collin E, Solla A, Vanden Broek A. 2004. Vegetative bud-burst variability of European elms. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 3745.
  • Sinclair WA, Zahand JP, Melching JB. 1975. Anatomical markers for resistance of Ulmus americana to Ceratocystis ulmi. Phytopathology 65: 349352.
  • Smalley EB. 1963. Seasonal fluctuations in susceptibility of young elm seedlings to Dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 53: 846853.
  • Smalley EB, Kais AG. 1966. Seasonal variations in the resistance of various elm species to Dutch elm Disease. In: GerholdHD, SchreinerEJ, McDermottRE, WinieskiJA, eds. Breeding Pest-Resistant Trees. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 279287.
  • Solla A, Gil L. 2002. Xylem vessel diameter as a factor in resistance of Ulmus minor to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Forest Pathology 32: 123134.
  • Solla A, Gil L. 2003. Evaluating Verticillium dahliae for biological control of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi in Ulmus minor. Plant Pathology 52: 579585.
  • Solla A, Bohnens J, Collin E, Diamandis S, Franke A, Gil L, Burón M, Santini A, Mittempergher L, Pinon J, Vanden Broek A. 2005. Screening European elms for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Forest Science 51: (In press.)
  • Sperry JS, Nichols KL, Sullivan JEM, Eastlack SE. 1994. Comparative studies of xylem embolism in ring-porous, diffuse porous and coniferous trees of northern Utah and interior Alaska. Ecology 75: 17361752.
  • Stipes RJ, Campana R. 1981. Compendium of Elm Diseases. St Paul, MN, USA: American Phytopathological Society.
  • Tchernoff V. 1965. Methods for screening and for the rapid selection of elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 14: 409452.
  • Tyree MT, Zimmermann MH. 2002. Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Wang CW. 1961. The Forests of China, with a Survey of Grassland and Dessert Vegetation. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University.
  • Webber JF. 2004. Experimental studies on factors influencing the transmission of Dutch elm disease. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 197205.
  • Zürcher ER. 1986. Sprossachsen – Ontogenie der Bergulme (Ulmus glabra Huds.), bei Normal- und Langtagbedingungen. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich 131: 235294.