SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aars J, Ims RA. 1999. The effect of habitat corridors on rates of transfer and interbreeding between vole demes. Ecology 80: 16481655.
  • Apparicio P. 2000. Residential segregation indices: a tool integrated into a geographical information system. Cybergeo 134.
  • Arendt JD, Wilson DS. 1997. Optimistic growth: competition and an ontogenetic niche-shift select for rapid growth in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus). Evolution 51: 19461954.
  • Arnal G. 1996. Les plantes protégées d’Ile de France. Paris, France: Biotope Collection Pénélope.
  • Arthur AE, Gale JS, Lawrence MJ. 1973. Variation in wild populations of Papaver dublium. Heredity 30: 189197.
  • Barrett SCH, Kohn J. 1991. The genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plant: implications for conservation. In: FalkD, HolsingerKE, eds. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 330.
  • Baskin JM, Baskin CC. 1998. Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.
  • Boudjemadi K, Lecomte J, Clobert J. 1999. Influence of connectivity on demography and dispersal in two contrasting habitats: an experimental approach. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 12071224.
  • Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A. 1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography, effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58: 445449.
  • Danton P, Baffray M. 1995. Inventaire des plantes protégées en France. Paris, France: Nathan
  • Dupré C, Ehrlen J. 2002. Habitat configuration, species traits and plant distributions. Journal of Ecology 90: 796–805.
  • Eriksson O, Kiviniemi K. 1999. Site occupancy, recruitment and extinction thresholds in grassland plants: an experimental study. Biological Conservation 87: 319325.
  • Fahrig L, Merriam G. 1985. Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66: 17621768.
  • González-Astorga J, Núñez-Farfán J. 2000. Variable demography in relation to germination time in Tagetes micantha Cav. (Asteraceae). Plant Ecology 151: 253259.
  • Grasman J, HilleRisLambers R. 1997. On local extinction in a metapopulation. Ecological Modelling 103: 7180.
  • Gutiérrez JR, Maserve PL. 2003. El Niño effects on soil seed bank dynamics in north-central Chile. Oecologia 134: 511517.
  • Haddad MH. 1999. Corridor and distance effects on interpatch movements: a landscape experiment with butterflies. Ecological Applications 9: 612622.
  • Haddad NM, Baum KA. 1999. An experimental test of corridor effects on butterfly densities. Ecological Applications 9: 623633.
  • Hanski I. 1997. Metapopulation dynamics: from concepts and observations to predictive models. In: HanskiI, GilpinME, eds. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. London, UK: Academic Press, 6992.
  • Hanski I, Simberloff D. 1997. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain and application to conservation. In: HanskiI, GilpinME, eds. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. London, UK: Academic Press, 526.
  • Hanski I, Moilanen A, Gyllenberg M. 1996. Minimum viable metapopulation size. American Naturalist 147: 527541.
  • Heschel MS, Paige KN. 1995. Inbreeding depression, environmental stress, and population size in scarlet gilia (Ipomopsis aggregata). Conservation Biology 9: 126133.
  • Higgins K, Lynch M. 2001. Metapopulation extinction caused by mutation accumulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98: 29282933.
  • Johansson ME, Nilsson C, Nilsson E. 1996. Do rivers function as corridors for plant dispersal? Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 593–598.
  • Kalisz S, Horth L, McPeek MA. 1997. Fragmentation and the role of seed banks in promoting persistence in isolated populations of Collinsia verna. In: SchwartzMW, ed. Conservation in highly fragmented landscapes. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall, 286312.
  • Kirchner F, Ferdy JB, Andalo C, Colas B, Moret J. 2003. Role of corridors in plant dispersal: an example with the endangered Ranunculus nodiflorus. Conservation Biology 14: 401410.
  • Leck MA. 1996. Germination of macrophytes from a Delaware River tidal freshwater wetland (USA). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 123: 4867.
  • Legendre P, Fortin MJ. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80: 107138.
  • Levin R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15: 237240.
  • Levin DA. 1990. The seed bank as a source of genetic novelty in plants. American Naturalist 135: 563572.
  • Luijten SH, Dierick A, Oostermeijer JGB, Raijmann LEL, Den Nijs JCM. 2000. Population size, genetic variation and reproductive success in the rapidly declining, self-incompatible Arnica montana in the Netherlands. Conservation Biology 14: 17761786.
  • Mech SG, Hallett JG. 2001. Evaluating the effectiveness of corridors: a genetic approach. Conservation Biology 15: 467474.
  • Mills LS, Allendorf FW. 1996. The one-migrant-per-generation rule in conservation and management. Conservation Biology 10: 15091518.
  • Murphy HT, Lovett-Doust J. 2004. Context and connectivity in plant metapopulations and landscape mosaics: does the matrix matter? Oikos 105: 314.
  • Olivier L, Galland JP, Maurin H, Roux JP. 1995. Livre Rouge de la Flore Menacée de France. Tome 1. Espèces prioritaires. Paris, France: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle.
  • Pavone LV, Reader RJ. 1982. The dynamics of seed bank size and seed state of Medicago lupulina. Journal of Ecology 70: 537547.
  • Richards CM. 2000. Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. American Naturalist 155: 383394.
  • Richards CM, Emery SN, McCauley DE. 2003. Genetic and demographic dynamics of small populations of Silene latifolia. Heredity 90: 181186.
  • Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392: 491494.
  • Schaffer WM. 1974. Optimal reproductive effort in fluctuating environments. American Naturalist 108: 783790.
  • Simberloff D, Farr JA, Cox J, Mehlman DW. 1992. Movement corridors: conservation bargains or poor investments? Conservation Biology 6: 493504.
  • Tewksbury JJ, Levey DJ, Haddad NM, Sargent S, Orrock JL, Weldon A, Danielson BJ, Brinkerhoff J, Damschen EI, Townsend P. 2002. Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in fragmented landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 1292312926.
  • Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B. 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 268: 17911796.
  • Thrall PH, Richards CM, McCauley DE, Antonovics J. 1998. Metapopulation collapse: the consequences of limited gene-flow in spatially structured populations. In: BascompteJ, SoléRV, eds. Modeling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 83104.
  • Wahlberg N, Klemetti T, Hanski I. 2002. Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly. Ecography 25: 224232.
  • Winkler E, Stocklin J. 2002. Sexual and vegetative reproduction of Hieracium pilosella L. under competition and disturbance: a grid-based simulation model. Annals of Botany 89: 525536.
  • Young A, Boyle T, Brown T. 1996. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 413418.