You have free access to this content

Pollination mutualisms in Caryophyllaceae

  1. Susan Kephart

Article first published online: 26 JAN 2006

DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01656.x

Issue

New Phytologist

New Phytologist

Volume 169, Issue 4, pages 637–640, February 2006

Additional Information

How to Cite

Kephart, S. (2006), Pollination mutualisms in Caryophyllaceae. New Phytologist, 169: 637–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01656.x

Author Information

  1. Department of Biology, Willamette University, Salem, OR 97301, USA (tel +1 503 3706481; fax +1 503 3755425; email skephart@willamette.edu)

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 26 JAN 2006
  2. Article first published online: 26 JAN 2006

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (232K)

References

  • Ashman T, Knight T, Agren J, Steets J, Amarasekare P, Burd M, Campbell D, Dudash M, Johnston M, Mazer S, Mitchell R, Morgan M, Wilson W. 2004. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 86: 76–91.
  • Barthelmess E, Richards D, McCauley D. 2006. Relative effects of nocturnal vs diurnal pollinators and distance on gene flow in small Silene alba populations. New Phytologist 169: 689–698.
    Direct Link:
  • Biere A, Honders S. 2006. Coping with third parties in a nursery pollination mutualism: Hadena bicruris avoids oviposition on pathogen-infected, less rewarding Silene latifolia. New Phytologist 169: 719–727.
    Direct Link:
  • Bloch D, Werdenberg N, Erhardt A. 2006. Pollination crisis in the butterfly pollinated, wild carnation Dianthus carthusianorum? New Phytologist 169: 699–706.
    Direct Link:
  • Brantjes N. 1976. Prevention of super-parasitism of Melandrium flowers (Caryophyllaceae) Hadena (Lepidoptera). Oecologia 24: 1–6.
  • Bronstein J, Dieckmann U, Ferrière R. 2004. Coevolutionary dynamics and the conservation of mutualisms. In: FerrièreR, DieckmannU, CouvetD (eds). Evolutionary Conservation Biology. Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press, 305–325.
  • Carlsson-Granér U, Elmqvist T, Agren J, Gardfjell H, Ingvarsson P. 1998. Floral sex ratios, disease, and seed set in dioecious Silene dioica. Journal of Ecology 86: 76–91.
    Direct Link:
  • Dötterl S, Jürgens A, Seifert K, Laube T, Weißbecker B, Schütz S. 2006. Nursery pollination by a moth in Silene latifolia: the role of odours in eliciting antennal and behavioural responses. New Phytologist 169: 707–718.
    Direct Link:
  • Dufay M, Anstett M. 2003. Conflicts between plants and pollinators that reproduce within inflorescences. Oikos 100: 3–14.
    Direct Link:
  • Elzinga J, Turin H, Van Damme J, Biere A. 2005. Plant population size and isolation affect herbivory of Silene latifolia by the specialist herbivore Hadena bicruris and parasitism of the herbivore by parasitoids. Oecologia 144: 416–426.
  • Fenster C, Armbruster W, Wilson P, Dudash M, Thomson J. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 35: 375–403.
  • Fenster C, Dudash M. 2001. Spatiotemporal variation in the role of hummingbirds as pollinators of Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae). Ecology 82: 844–851.
  • Giles B, Pettersson T, Carlsson-Granér U, Ingvarsson P. 2006. Natural selection on floral traits of female Silene dioica by a sexually transmitted disease. New Phytologist 169: 729–739.
    Direct Link:
  • Grant V. 2004. Plant Speciation, the book: perspectives and paradigms. New Phytologist 161: 8–11.
    Direct Link:
  • Gross C. 2005. Pollination efficiency and pollinator effectiveness. In: DafniA, KevanP, HusbandB (eds). Practical Pollination Biology. Cambridge, ON: Enviroquest, Ltd, 354–363.
  • Holland J, Fleming T. 2002. Co-pollinators and specialization in the pollinating seed-consumer mutualism between senita cacti and senita moths. Oecologia 133: 534–540.
  • Inouye D, Gill D, Dudash M, Fenster C. 1994. A model and lexicon for pollen fate. American. Journal of Botany 81: 1517–1530.
  • Jennersten O. 1988. Pollination of Viscaria vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae): the contributions of diurnal and nocturnal insects to seed set and seed predation. Oikos 52: 310–327.
  • Jennersten O, Nilsson S. 1993. Insect flower visitation frequency and seed production in relation to patch size of Viscaria vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). Oikos 68: 283–292.
  • Judd W, Campbell S, Kellogg E, Stevens P, Donoghue M. 2002. Plant Systematics: a Phylogenetic Approach. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Jürgens A. 2004. Flower scent composition in diurnal Silene species (Caryophyllaceae): phylogenetic constraints or adaptation to flower visitors? Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 32: 841–859.
  • Jürgens A, Witt T, Gottsberger G. 1996. Reproduction and pollination in Central European populations of Silene and Saponaria species. Botanica Acta 109: 316–324.
  • Jürgens A, Witt T, Gottsberger G. 2002. Flower scent composition in night-flowering Silene species (Caryophyllaceae). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 30: 383–397.
  • Jürgens A, Witt T, Gottsberger G. 2003. Flower scent composition in Dianthus and Saponaria species (Caryophyllaceae) and its relevance for pollination biology and taxonomy. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 31: 345–357.
  • Kawakita A, Takimura A, Terachi T, Sota T, Kato M. 2004. Cospeciation analysis of an obligate pollination mutualism: Have Glochidion trees (Euphorbiaceae) and pollinating Epicephala moths (Gracillariidae) diversified in parallel? Evolution 58: 2201–2214.
  • Kephart S, Reynolds R, Rutter M, Fenster C, Dudash M. 2006. Pollination and seed predation by moths on Silene and allied Caryophyllaceae: evaluating a model system to study the evolution of mutualisms. New Phytologist 169: 667–680.
  • Larson B, Kevan P, Inouye D. 2001. Flies and flowers: taxonomic diversity of anthophiles and pollinators. Canadian Entomologist 133: 439–465.
  • Marr D. 2006. Seed fitness of hermaphrodites in areas with females and anther smut disease: Silene acaulis and Microbotryum violaceum. New Phytologist 169: 741–751.
    Direct Link:
  • Menges E. 1995. Factors limiting fecundity and germination in small populations of Silene regia (Caryophyllaceae), a rare hummingbird-pollinated prairie forb. American Midland Naturalist 133: 242–255.
  • Oxelman B, Lidén M, Rabeler R, Popp M. 2001. A revised generic classification of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 20: 513–518.
  • Pettersson M. 1991. Pollination by a guild of fluctuation moth populations option for unspecialization in Silene vulgaris. Journal of Ecology 79: 591–604.
  • Rausher M. 2005. Plant evolutionary ecology. New Phytologist 165: 2–5.
    Direct Link:
  • Rieseberg L. 2004. Plant Speciation: the rise of poor cousins. New Phytologist 161: 3–8.
    Direct Link:
  • Talavera S, Arista M, Salgueiro F. 1996. Population size, pollination, and breeding system of Silene stockenii Chater (Caryophyllaceae), and annual gynodioecious species of southern Spain. Botanica Acta 109: 333–339.
  • Thompson J, Pellmyr O. 1992. Mutualism with pollinating seed parasites amid co-pollinators: Constraints on specialization. Ecology 73: 1780–1791.
  • Troubridge J, Crabo L. 2002. A review of the nearctic species of Hadena Schrank, 1802 (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with descriptions of six new species. Fabreries 27: 109–154.
  • Westerbergh A. 2004. An interaction between a specialized seed predator moth and its dioecious host plant shifting from parasitism to mutualism. Oikos 105: 564–574.
    Direct Link:
  • Wolfe L. 2002. Why alien invaders succeed: Support for the escape-from-enemy hypothesis. American Naturalist 160: 705–711.
  • Young H. 2002. Diurnal and nocturnal pollination of Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 433–440.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (232K)