SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adams KL, Wendel JF. 2005. Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8: 135141.
  • Ainouche ML, Baumel A, Salmon A, Yannic G. 2003. Hybridization, polyploidy and speciation in Spartina (Poaceae). New Phytologist 161: 165172.
  • Amsellem L, Noyer J-L, Hossaert-McKey M. 2001. Evidence for a switch in the reproductive biology of Rubus alceifolius (Rosaceae) towards apomixis, between its native range and its area of introduction. American Journal of Botany 88: 22432251.
  • Van Andel TH. 2002. The climate and landscape of the middle part of the Weichselian glaciation in Europe: the stage 3 project. Quaternary Research 57: 28.
  • Anderson E. 1949. Introgressive Hybridization. New York: Wiley.
  • Arnold ML. 1997. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Asker SE, Jerling L. 1992. Apomixis in Plants. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Barraclough TG, Birky CW, Burt A. 2003. Diversification in sexual and asexual organisms. Evolution 57: 21662172.
  • Barton NH. 2001. The role of hybridization in evolution. Molecular Ecology 10: 551568.
  • Bayer RJ, Chandler GT. in press. Evolution of polyploid agamic complexes: a case study using the Catipes group of Antennaria, including A. rosea complex (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae). In: HörandlE, GrossniklausU, SharbelT, Van DijkP, eds. Apomixis: Evolution, Mechanisms and Perspectives. Ruggell, Liechtenstein: Gantner Verlag.
  • Bierzychudek P. 1985. Patterns in plant parthenogenesis. Experientia 41: 12551264.
  • Birks HJB. 1986. Late-quaternary biotic changes in terrestrial and lacustrine environments, with particular reference to north-west Europe. In: BerglundE, ed. Handbook of Holocene Palaecology and Palaehydrology. New York: Wiley, 365.
  • Birky CW. 1996. Heterozygosity, heteromorphy, and phylogenetic trees in asexual eukaryotes. Genetics 144: 427437.
  • Carman JG. 1997. Asynchronous expression of duplicate genes in angiosperms may cause apomixis, bispory, tetraspory, and polyembryony. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 61: 5194.
  • Comai L. 2005. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 836846.
  • Congiu L, Dupanlop I, Patarnello T, Fontana F, Rossi R, Arlatis G, Zane L. 2001. Identification of interspecific hybrids by amplified fragment length polymorphism: the case of sturgeon. Molecular Ecology 10: 23552359.
  • Delmotte F, Sabater-Munoz B, Prunier-Leterme N, Latorre A, Sunnucks P, Rispe C, Simon J-C. 2003. Phylogenetic evidence for hybrid origins of asexual lineages in an aphid species. Evolution 57: 12911303.
  • Di Rienzo A, Donnelly P, Toomajian C, Sisk B, Hill A, Petzl-Erler ML, Haines GK, Barch DH. 1998. Heterogeneity of microsatellite mutations within and between loci, and implications for human demographic histories. Genetics 148: 12691284.
  • Dice LR. 1945. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Journal of Ecology 26: 297302.
  • Dobeš C, Vitek E. 2000. Documented Chromosome Number Checklist of Austrian Vascular Plants. Vienna, Austria: Naturhistorisches Museum.
  • Ericsson S. 1992. The microspecies of the Ranunculus auricomus complex treated at the species level. Annales Botanici Fennici 29: 123158.
  • Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. 2005. Arlequin, Version 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Available at: http://cmpg.unibe.ch/software/arlequin3.
  • Fehrer J, Šimek R, Krahulcová A, Krahulec F, Chrtek J, Bräutigam E, Bräutigam S. 2005. Evolution, hybridisation, and clonal distribution of apo- and amphimictic species of Hieracium subgen. Pilosella (Asteraceae, Lactucaceae) in a central European mountain range. In: BakkerF, ChatrouL, GravendeelB, PelserPB, eds. Plant Species-Level Systematics: New Perspectives on Pattern and Process. Ruggell, Liechtenstein: Gantner Verlag, 175201.
  • Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenetics: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783791.
  • Frenzel B, Pécsi M, Velichko AA. 1992. Atlas of Paleoclimates and Paleoenvironments of the Northern Hemisphere, Late Pleistocene–Holocene. Budapest, Hungary: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
  • Goldstein DB, Linares AR, Feldman MW, Cavalli-Sforza LL. 1995. An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci. Genetics 139: 463471.
  • Gornall RJ. 1999. Population genetic structure in agamospermous plants. In: HollingsworthPM, BatemanRM, GornallRJ, eds. Molecular Systematics and Plant Evolution. London, UK: Taylor & Francis, 118138.
  • Grimanelli D, Leblanc O, Perotti E, Grossniklaus U. 2001. Developmental genetics of gametophytic apomixis. Trends in Genetics 17: 597604.
  • Guo Y-P, Saukel J, Mittermayr R, Ehrendorfer F. 2005. AFLP analyses demonstrate genetic divergence, hybridization, and multiple polyploidization in the evolution of Achillea (Asteraceae-Anthemideae). New Phytologist 166: 273290.
  • Hardy OJ, Vekemans X. 2002. SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes 2: 618620.
  • Hegarty MJ, Hiscock SJ. 2005. Hybrid speciation in plants: new insights from molecular studies. New Phytologist 165: 411423.
  • Heuertz M, Hausman J-F, Hardy OJ, Vendramin GG, Fracaria-Lacoste N, Vekemans X. 2004. Nuclear microsatellites reveal contrasting patterns of genetic structure between western and southeastern European populations of the common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Evolution 58: 976988.
  • Hollingsworth PM, Ennos RA. 2004. Neighbour joining trees, dominant markers and population genetic structure. Heredity 92: 490498.
  • Hörandl E. 1998. Species concepts in agamic complexes: applications in the Ranunculus auricomus complex and general perspectives. Folia Geobotanica 33: 335348.
  • Hörandl E. 2002. Morphological differentiation within the Ranunculus cassubicus group compared to variation of isozymes, ploidy levels, and reproductive systems: implications for taxonomy. Plant Systematics and Evolution 233: 6578.
  • Hörandl E. 2004. Comparative analysis of genetic divergence among sexual ancestors of apomictic complexes using isozyme data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 615622.
  • Hörandl E, Greilhuber J. 2002. Diploid and autotetraploid sexuals and their relationships to apomicts in the Ranunculus cassubicus group: insights from DNA content and isozyme variation. Plant Systematics and Evolution 234: 85100.
  • Hörandl E, Gutermann W. 1998. Der Ranunculus auricomus-Komplex in Österreich. 2. Die R. cassubicus-, R-monophyllus- und R. fallax-Sammelgruppe. Botanische Jahrbücher 120: 545598.
  • Hörandl E, Paun O. in press. Patterns and sources of genetic diversity in apomictic plants: implications for evolutionary potentials and ecology. In: HörandlE, GrossniklausU, SharbelT, Van DijkP, eds. Apomixis: Evolution, Mechanisms and Perspectives. Ruggell, Liechtenstein: Gantner Verlag.
  • Hörandl E, Paun O, Johansson JT, Lehnebach C, Armstrong T, Chen L, Lockhart P. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary traits in Ranunculus s.l. (Ranunculaceae) inferred from ITS sequence analysis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36: 305327.
  • Huson DH. 1998. SplitsTree: analysing and visualizing evolutionary data. Bioinformatics 14: 6873.
  • Innes DJ, Herbert PND. 1988. The origin and genetic basis of obligate parthenogenesis in Daphnia pulex. Evolution 42: 10241035.
  • Jalas J, Suominen J, eds. 1989. Atlas Florae Europaeae. Distribution of Vascular Plants in Europe. Vol. 8, Nymphaeaceae to Ranunculaceae. Helsinki, Finland: The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe.
  • Kearney M. 2005. Hybridization, glaciation and geographical parthenogenesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 495502.
  • Koch MA, Dobeš C, Mitchell-Olds T. 2003. Multiple hybrid formation in natural populations: concerted evolution of the internal transcribed spacer of nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS) in North American Arabis divaricarpa (Brassicaceae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 338350.
  • Levin DA. 2002. The Role of Chromosomal Change in Plant Evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Linder CR, Rieseberg LH. 2004. Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in plants. American Journal of Botany 91: 17001708.
  • Májovský J, Murin A, eds. 1987. Karyotaxonomicky prehl’ad flóry Slovenska. Bratislava, Slovakia: VEDA.
  • Mládenková K. 2005. Príspevok k taxonomickému štúdiu agregátu Ranunculus auricomus na Slovensku. Masters Thesis, Prírodovecká fakulta Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave.
  • Nei M, Li WH. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 76: 52695273.
  • Nogler GA. 1984. Genetics of apospory in apomictic Ranunculus auricomus: 5. conclusion. Botanica Helvetica 94: 411423.
  • O'Hanlon PC, Peakall R, Briese DT. 1999. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) reaveals introgression in weedy Onopordum thistles: hybridization and invasion. Molecular Ecology 8: 12391246.
  • Ohta T, Kimura M. 1973. A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genetical Research, Cambridge 22: 201204.
  • Paun O. 2005. Origin, diversity and evolutionary potentials of apomixis: insights from molecular population studies on the Ranunculus cassubicus complex. PhD Dissertation, University of Vienna, Vienna.
  • Paun O, Greilhuber J, Temsch E, Hörandl E. 2006. Patterns, sources and ecological implications of clonal diversity in apomictic Ranunculus carpaticola (Ranunculus auricomus complex, Ranunculaceae). Molecular Ecology 15: 897910.
  • Quarin CL, Espinoza F, Martinez EJ, Pessino SC, Bovo OA. 2001. A rise of ploidy level induces the expression of apomixis in Paspalum notatum. Sexual Plant Reproduction 13: 243249.
  • Rapp RA, Wendel JF. 2005. Epigenetics and plant evolution. New Phytologist 168: 8191.
  • Richards AJ. 2003. Apomixis in flowering plants: an overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 358: 10851093.
  • Rieseberg LH, Archer AM, Wayne RK. 1999. Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83: 363372.
  • Robertson A, Newton AC, Ennos RA. 2004. Multiple hybrid origins, genetic diversity and population genetic structure of two endemic Sorbus taxa on the Isle of Arran, Scotland. Molecular Ecology 13: 123134.
  • Rohlf FJ. 1997. NTSYS-Pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Setauket, Version 2.0.2. New York, USA: Exeter Software (http://www.ExeterSoftware.com).
  • Rousi A. 1956. Cytotaxonomy and reproduction in the apomictic Ranunculus auricomus group. Annales Botanici Societatis Zoologicae-Botanicae Fennicae ‘Vanamo’ 29: 164.
  • Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 406425.
  • Salmon A, Ainouche ML, Wendel JF. 2005. Genetic and epigenetic consequences of recent hybridization and polyploidy in Spartina (Poaceae). Molecular Ecology 14: 11631175.
  • Schlötterer C. 2000. Evolutionary dynamics of microsatellite DNA. Chromosoma 109: 365371.
  • Seehausen O. 2004. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 198207.
  • Segarra-Moragues JG, Palop-Esteban M, Gonzalez-Candelas F, Catalan P. 2004. Characterization of seven (CTT)n microsatellite loci in the pyrenean endemic Borderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae): remarks on ploidy level and hybrid origin assessed through allozymes and microsatellite analyses. Journal of Heredity 95: 177183.
  • Sharbel TF, Mitchell-Olds T. 2001. Recurrent polyploid origins and chloroplast phylogeography in the Arabis holboellii complex (Brassicaceae). Heredity 87: 5968.
  • Slatkin M. 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139: 457462.
  • Steinbach K, Gottsberger G. 1994. Phenology and pollination biology of five Ranunculus species in Giessen, Central Germany. Phyton 34: 203218.
  • Sümegi P, Krolopp E. 2002. Quatermalacological analyses for modeling of the Upper Weichselian palaeoenvironmental changes in the Carpathian Basin. Quaternary International 91: 5363.
  • Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Tsedakis PC, Lawson IT, Frogley MR, Hewitt GM, Preece RC. 2002. Buffered tree population changes in a Quaternary refugium: evolutionary implications. Science 297: 20442047.
  • Van Dijk P. 2003. Ecological and evolutionary opportunities of apomixis: insights from Taraxacum and Chondrilla. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 358: 11131121.
  • Van Dijk PJ, Vijverberg K. 2005. The significance of apomixis in the evolution of the angiosperms: a reappraisal. In: BakkerF, ChatrouL, GravendeelB, PelserPB, eds. Plant Species-Level Systematics: New Perspectives on Pattern and Process. Ruggell, Liechtenstein: Gantner Verlag, 101116.
  • Vriesendorp B, Bakker FT. 2005. Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in angiosperms: what can we do? Taxon 54: 593604.
  • Winkworth RC, Bryant D, Lockhart PJ, Havell D, Moulton V. 2005. Biogeographic interpretation of Split Graphs: Least Squares Optimization of branch length. Systematic Biology 54: 5665.