SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ashman T-L. 2000. Pollinator selectivity and its implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. Ecology 81: 25772591.
  • Ashman T-L, Stanton ML. 1991. Seasonal variation in pollination dynamics of the sexually dimorphic species, Sidalcea oregana ssp. spicata (Malvaceae). Ecology 72: 9931003.
  • Ashman T-L, Shivitz S, Swetz J. 2000. Understanding the basis of pollinator selectivity in sexually dimorphic Fragaria virginiana. Oikos 90: 347356.
  • Bell G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Biology 224: 223265.
  • Bell SA, Cresswell JE. 1998. The phenology of gender in homogamous flowers: temporal change in the residual sex function of flowers of Oil-seed Rape (Brassica napus). Functional Ecology 12: 298306.
  • Campbell DR, Waser NM, Price MV, Lynch EA, Mitchell RJ. 1991. Components of phenotypic selection: pollen export and flower corolla width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 45: 14581467.
  • Caruso CM. 2004. The quantitative genetics of floral trait variation in Lobelia: potential constraints on adaptive evolution. Evolution 58: 732740.
  • Charlesworth D. 1993. Why are unisexual flowers associated with wind pollination and unspecialized pollinators? American Naturalist 141: 481490.
  • Chen J-K. 1989. Systematic and evolutionary studies on Sagittaria from China. Wuhan, China: Wuhan University Press.
  • Cohen D, Dukas R. 1990. The optimal number of female flowers and the fruits-to-flowers ratio in plants under pollination and resource limitation. American Naturalist 135: 218241.
  • Conner JK, Rush S. 1996. Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105: 509516.
  • Corbet SA. 2003. Nectar sugar content: estimating standing crop and secretion rate in the field. Apidologie 34: 110.
  • Darwin C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. London: John Murray.
  • Delph LF. 1996. Flower size dimorphism in plants with unisexual flowers. In: LloydDG, BarrettSCH, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall, 217237.
  • Delph LF, Lively CM. 1992. Pollinator visitation, floral display, and nectar production of the sexual morphs of a gynodioecious shrub. Oikos 63: 161170.
  • Delph LF, Galloway LF, Stanton ML. 1996. Sexual dimorphism in flower size. American Naturalist 148: 299320.
  • Delph LF, Gehring JL, Frey FM, Arntz AM, Levri M. 2004. Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection. Evolution 58: 19361946.
  • Delph LF, Gehring JL, Arntz AM, Levri M, Frey FM. 2005. Genetic correlations with floral display lead to a sexual dimorphism in the cost of reproduction. American Naturalist 166: S31S41.
  • Diggle PK. 1997. Ontogenetic contingency and floral morphology: the effect of architecture and resource limitation. International Journal of Plant Science 158: 99107.
  • Diggle PK, Miller JS. 2004. Architectural effects mimic floral sexual dimorphism in Solanum (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 91: 20302040.
  • Dorken ME, Barrett SCH. 2003a. Life-history differentiation and the maintenance of monoecy and dioecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Evolution 57: 19731988.
  • Dorken ME, Barrett SCH. 2003b. Gender plasticity in Sagittaria sagittifolia (Alismataceae), a monoecious species. Plant Systematics and Evolution 237: 99106.
  • Dorken ME, Friedman J, Barrett SCH. 2002. The evolution and maintenance of monoecy and dioecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Evolution 56: 3141.
  • Eckhart VM. 1991. The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evolutionary Ecology 5: 370384.
  • Eckhart VM. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences. In: GeberMA, DawsonTE, DelphLF, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 123148.
  • Galen C. 1989. Measuring pollinator-mediated selection on morphometric floral traits: bumble bees and the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 43: 882890.
  • Harder LD, Barrett SCH. 1995. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373: 512515.
  • Harder LD, Barrett SCH. 1996. Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. In: LloydDG, BarrettSCH, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall, 140190.
  • Harder LD, Thomson JD. 1989. Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal-pollinated plants. American Naturalist 133: 323344.
  • Harder LD, Jordan CY, Gross WE, Routley MB. 2004. Beyond floricentrism: the pollination function of inflorescences. Plant Species Biology 19: 137148.
  • Huang S-Q. 2003. Flower dimorphism and the maintenance of andromonoecy in Sagittaria guyanensis subsp. lappula (Alismataceae). New Phytologist 157: 357364.
  • Huang S-Q, Jin B-F, Wang Q-F, Guo Y-H. 1999. Floral display and pollen flow in a natural population of Sagittaria trifolia. Acta Botanica Sinica 41: 726730.
  • Huang S-Q, Sun S-G, Takahashi Y, Guo Y-H. 2002. Gender variation of sequential inflorescences in a monoecious plant Sagittaria trifolia (Alismataceae). Annals of Botany 90: 613622.
  • Humeau L, Pailler T, Thompson JD. 2003. Flower size dimorphism in diclinous plants native to La Reunion Island. Plant Systematics and Evolution 240: 163173.
  • Kaul RB. 1979. Inflorescence architecture and flower sex ratios in Sagittaria brevirostra (Alismataceace). American Journal of Botany 66: 10621066.
  • Kawagoe T, Suzuki N. 2002. Floral sexual dimorphism and flower choice by pollinators in a nectarless monoecious vine Akebia quinata (Lardizabalaceae). Ecological Research 17: 295303.
  • Le Corff J, Ågren J, Schemske DW. 1998. Floral display, pollinator discrimination and female reproductive success in two monoecious Begonia species. Ecology 79: 16101619.
  • Lloyd DG. 1984. Gender allocations in outcrossing cosexual plants. In: DirzoR, SarukhánJ, eds. Perspectives on plant population ecology. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates, 277300.
  • Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1977. Secondary sex characters in plants. Botanical Review 43: 177216.
  • Lloyd DG, Yates JM. 1982. Intrasexual selection and the segregation of pollen and stigmas in hermaphrodite plants, exemplified by Wahlenbergia albomarginata (Campanulaceae). Evolution 36: 903913.
  • Martin NH. 2004. Flower size preferences of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) foraging on Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Evolutionary Ecological Research 6: 777782.
  • Meagher TR. 1999. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism. In: GeberMA, DawsonTE, DelphLF, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 275294.
  • Mitchell RJ, Karron JD, Holmquist KG, Bell JM. 2004. The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Functional Ecology 18: 116124.
  • Morgan MT. 1993. Fruit to flower ratios and trade-offs in size and number. Evolutionary Ecology 7: 219232.
  • Muenchow GE, Delesalle VA. 1994. Pollinators response to male floral display size in two Sagittaria (Alismataceae) species. American Journal of Botany 81: 568573.
  • Ohashi K, Yahara T. 2001. Behavioural responses of pollinators to variation in floral display size and their influences on the evolution of floral traits. In: ChittkaL, ThomsonJD, eds. Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behavior and floral evolution. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 274296.
  • SAS Institute Inc. 2000. SAS/Stat User's Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute.
  • Sato H, Yahara T. 1999. Trade-offs between flower number and investment to a flower in selfing and outcrossing varieties of Impatiens hypophylla (Balsaminaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 16991707.
  • Schemske DW, Ågren J. 1995. Deceit pollination and selection on female flower size in Begonia involucrata: an experimental approach. Evolution 49: 207214.
  • Snow AA, Spira TP, Simpson R, Klips RA. 1996. The ecology of geitonogamous pollination. In: LloydDG, BarrettSCH, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall, 191216.
  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry. New York: W.H. Freeman.
  • Stanton ML, Snow AA, Handell SN. 1986. Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness. Science 232: 16251627.
  • Thomson JD. 1988. Effects of variation in inflorescence size and floral rewards on the visitation rates of traplining pollinators of Aralia hispida. Evolutionary Ecology 2: 6576.
  • Thomson JD, Barrett SCH. 1981. Temporal variation of gender in Aralia hispida (Araliaceae). Evolution 35: 10941107.
  • Vamosi JC, Otto SP. 2002. When looks can kill: the evolution of sexually-dimorphic floral display and the extinction of dioecious plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Biology 269: 11871194.
  • Vaughton G, Ramsey M. 1998. Floral display, pollinator visitation and reproductive success in the dioecious perennial herb Wurmbea dioica (Liliaceae). Oecologia 115: 93101.
  • Williams CF, Kuchenreuther MA, Drew A. 2000. Floral dimorphism, pollination, and self-fertilization in gynodioecious Geranium richardsonii (Geraniaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 661669.
  • Wilson P, Thomson JD, Stanton ML, Rigney LP. 1994. Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination success. American Naturalist 143: 283296.
  • Worley AC, Barrett SCH. 2001. Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): Genetic correlations between flower size and number. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14: 469481.