SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alfaro ME, Zoller S, Luitzoni F. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 255266.
  • Armbruster WS, Edwards ME, Debevec EM. 1994. Floral character displacement generates assemblage structure of Western-Australian triggerplants (Stylidium). Ecology 75: 315329.
  • Armbruster WS, Pérez-Barrales R, Arroyo J, Edwards ME, Vargas P. 2006. Three-dimensional reciprocity of floral morphs in wild flax (Linum suffruticosum): a new twist on heterostyly. New Phytologist 171: 581590.
  • Arroyo J. 2002. Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae), the evolution of flower polymorphisms and conservation beyond the ‘red lists’. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 75: 3955.
  • Arroyo J, Barrett SCH. 2000. Discovery of distyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 748751.
  • Arroyo J, Barrett SCH, Hidalgo R, Cole WW. 2002. Evolutionary maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 12421249.
  • Arroyo J, Dafni A. 1995. Variations in habitat, season, flower traits and pollinators in dimorphic Narcissus tazetta L. (Amaryllidaceae) in Israel. New Phytologist 129: 135145.
  • Baker HG. 1955. Self compatibility and establishment after long distance dispersal. Evolution 9: 347349.
  • Baker AM, Thompson JD, Barrett SCH. 2000a. Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. I. Floral variation and style-morph ratios. Heredity 84: 502513.
  • Baker AM, Thompson JD, Barrett SCH. 2000b. Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. II. Fitness comparisons between style morphs. Heredity 84: 514524.
  • Barrett SCH, Cole WW, Arroyo J, Cruzan MB, Lloyd DG. 1997. Sexual polymorphisms in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae): Is this species tristylous? Heredity 78: 135145.
  • Barrett SCH, Harder LD. 2005. The evolution of polymorphic sexual systems in daffodils (Narcissus). New Phytologist 165: 4553.
  • Barrett SCH, Harder LD, Cole WW. 2004. Correlated evolution of floral morphology and mating-type frequencies in a sexually polymorphic plant. Evolution 58: 964975.
  • Barrett SCH, Lloyd DG, Arroyo J. 1996. Stylar polymorphisms and the evolution of heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). In: LloydDG, BarrettSCH, eds. Floral biology, studies on floral evolution in animal- pollinated plants. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall, 339376.
  • Bateman AJ. 1954. The genetics of Narcissus. I. Sterility. Daffodil and Tulip Year Book 19: 2329
  • Busch JW. 2005. The evolution of self-compatibility in geographically peripheral populations of Leavenworthia alabamica (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 95: 1503211512.
  • Cesaro AC, Barrett SCH, Maurice S, Vaissiere BE, Thompson JD. 2004. An experimental evaluation of self-interference in Narcissus assoanus: functional and evolutionary implications. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 13671376.
  • Cesaro AC, Thompson JD. 2004. Darwin's cross-promotion hypothesis and the evolution of stylar polymorphism. Ecology Letters 7: 12091215.
  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1979. A model for the evolution of distyly. American Naturalist 114: 467498.
  • Darwin C. 1877. On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilized. London, UK: John Murray.
  • De Nettancourt D. 1977. Incompatibility in angiosperms. Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics 3. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Dinkel T, Lunau K. 2001. How drone flies (Eristalis tenax L., Syrphidae, Diptera) use floral guides to locate food sources. Journal of Insect Physiology 47: 11111118.
  • Dulberger R. 1964. Flower dimorphism and self-incompatibility in Narcissus tazetta L. Evolution 18: 361363.
  • Dumolin-Lapegue S, Pemonge MH, Petit RJ. 1997. An enlarged set of consensus primers for the study of organelle DNA in plants. Molecular Ecology 6: 393397.
  • Faivre AE. 2000. Ontogenetic differences in heterostylous plants and implications for development from a herkogamous ancestor. Evolution 54: 847858.
  • Graham SW, Barrett SCH. 2004. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the evolution of stylar polymorphisms in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 91: 10071021.
  • Herrera CM. 1987. Components of pollinator quality: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos 50: 7990.
  • Herrera CM. 1995. Floral biology, microclimate, and pollination by ectothermic bees in an early-blooming herb. Ecology 76: 218228.
  • Hiei K, Suzuki K. 2001. Visitation frequency of Melampyrum roseum var. japonicum (Scrophulariaceae) by three bumblebee species and its relation to pollination efficiency. Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 11671174.
  • Hodgings KA, Barrett SCH. 2006. Mating patterns and demography in the tristylous daffodil Narcissus triandrus. Heredity 96: 262270.
  • Igic B, Bohs L, Kohn JR. 2004. Historical inferences from the self-incompatibility locus. New Phytologist 161: 97105.
  • Igic B, Bohs L, Kohn JR. 2006. Ancient polymorphism reveals unidirectional breeding system shifts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 13591363.
  • Kearns CA, Inouye DW. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. Niwot, CO, USA: Colorado University Press.
  • Kohn JR, Graham SW, Morton B, Doyle JJ, Barrett SCH. 1996. Reconstruction of the evolution of reproductive characters in Pontederiaceae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction-site variation. Evolution 50: 14541469.
  • Lau P, Bosque C. 2003. Pollen flow in the distylous Palicourea fendleri (Rubiaceae): an experimental test of the disassortative pollen flow hypothesis. Oecologia 135: 593600.
  • Lloyd DG, Schoen DJ. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153: 358369.
  • Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1992a. The evolution of heterostyly. In: BarrettSCH, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 151178.
  • Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1992b. The selection of heterostyly. In: BarrettSCH, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 179207.
  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 1999. MacClade, version 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sunderland, MA. USA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
  • Maire R. 1959. Flore de l’Afrique du Nord, VI. Paris, France: Paul Lechevalier.
  • Medrano M, Herrera CM, Barrett SCH. 2005. Herkogamy and mating patterns in the self-compatible daffodil Narcissus longispathus. Annals of Botany 95: 11051111.
  • Nishihiro J, Washitani I, Thomson JD, Thomson BA. 2000. Patterns and consequences of stigma height variation in a natural population of a distylous plant, Primula sieboldii. Functional Ecology 14: 502512.
  • Nylander JAA. 2002. MrModeltest. Version 1.0b. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Systematic Zoology, Uppsala University.
  • Ornduff R. 1988. Distyly and monomorphism in Villarsia (Menyanthaceae): some evolutionary considerations. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75: 761767.
  • Ornduff R. 1992. Historical perspective on heterostyly. In: BarrettSCH, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 3139.
  • Pérez R, Vargas P, Arroyo J. 2004. Convergent evolution of flower polymorphism in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). New Phytologist 161: 235252.
  • Pérez-Barrales R. 2005. La evolución de la heterostilia en Narcissus: análisis macro y microevolutivo. PhD dissertation, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
  • Petterson E, Hasselrot AE. 1994. Mating and nectar feeding in the psychomyiid caddis-fly Tinodes waeneri. Aquatic Insects 16: 177187.
  • Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817818.
  • Posada D, Crandall KA. 2001. Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution. Systematic Biology 50: 581601.
  • Quinn G, Keough M. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 15721574.
  • Routley MB, Bertin RI, Husband BC. 2004. Correlated evolution of dichogamy and self-incompatibility: a phylogenetic perspective. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 983993.
  • Sage TL, Strumas F, Cole WW, Barrett SCH. 1999. Differential ovule development following self- and cross-pollination: the basis of self-sterility in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 855870.
  • Schoen DJ, Johnston MO, L’Heureux AM, Marsolais JV. 1997. Evolutionary history of the mating system in Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 51: 10901099.
  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Freeman.
  • Stone JL. 1996. Components of pollination effectiveness in Psychotria suerrensis, a tropical distylous shrub. Oecologia 107: 504512.
  • Stone JL. 2002. Molecular mechanisms underlying the breakdown of gametophythic self-incompatibility. Quarterly Review of Biology 77: 1732.
  • Stone JL, Thomson JD. 1994. The evolution of distyly: pollen transfer in artificial flowers. Evolution 48: 15951606.
  • Swofford DL. 1999. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Version 4.0. Champain, IL, USA: Illinois Natural History Survey.
  • Takebayashi N, Morrell PL. 2001. Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach. American Journal of Botany 88: 11431150.
  • Thompson JD, Barrett SCH, Baker AM. 2003. Frequency-dependent variation in reproductive success in Narcissus: implications for the maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 270: 949953.
  • Truyens S, Arbo MM, Shore JS. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships, chromosome and breeding system evolution in Turnera (Turneraceae): inferences from ITS sequence data. American Journal of Botany 92: 17491758.
  • Vogel S, Muller-Doblies D. 1975. Eine nachtblütige herbst-Narzisse. Zwiebeldbau und blütenökologie von Narcissus viridiflorus Scousboe. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographic 96: 427447.