SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Agrawal AA, Rutter MT. 1998. Dynamic anti-herbivore defense in ant-plants: the role of induced responses. Oikos 83: 227236.
  • Aigner PA. 2001. Optimality modeling and fitness tradeoffs: when should plants become pollinator specialists? Oikos 95: 177184.
  • Aigner PA. 2004. Floral specialization without trade-offs: optimal corolla flare in contrasting pollination environments. Ecology 85: 25602569.
  • Alarcón R. 2004. The structure of plant–pollinator interactions in montane meadow environments. PhD thesis. Riverside, CA, USA: University of California.
  • Asker S, Jerling L. 1992. Apomixis in plants. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
  • Axelrod R, Hamilton WD. 1981. The evolution of cooperation. Science 211: 13901396.
  • Baker HG. 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after ‘long-distance’ dispersal. Evolution 9: 347348.
  • Baker HG. 1967. Support for Baker's Law as a rule. Evolution 21: 853856.
  • Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melián CJ, Olesen JM. 2003. The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100: 93839387.
  • Bascompte J, Jordano P, Olesen JM. 2006. Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312: 431433.
  • Beattie AJ. 1985. The evolutionary ecology of ant–plant mutualisms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beattie AJ. 1989. Myrmecotrophy: plants fed by ants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4: 172176.
  • Beattie AJ, Culver DC. 1981. The guild of myrmecochores in the herbaceous flora of West Virginia forests. Ecology 62: 107115.
  • Becerra JXI, Venable DL. 1989. Extrafloral nectaries: a defense against ant–Homoptera mutualisms? Oikos 55: 276280.
  • Bentley BL. 1977. Extrafloral nectaries and protection by pugnacious bodyguards. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 8: 407428.
  • Bernhardt P. 2000. Convergent evolution and adaptive radiation of beetle-pollinated angiosperms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 222: 293320.
  • Blattner FR, Weising K, Banfer G, Maschwitz U, Fiala B. 2001. Molecular analysis of phylogenetic relationships among myrmecophytic Macaranga species (Euphorbiaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 19: 331344.
  • Blüthgen N, Verhaagh M, Goitia W, Jaffe K, Morawetz W, Barthlott W. 2000. How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia 125: 229240.
  • Boesewinkel FD, Bouman F. 1984. The seed: structure. In: JohriBM, ed. Embryology of angiosperms. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 567610.
  • Böhning-Gaese K, Gaese BH, Rabemanantsoa SB. 1999. Importance of primary and secondary seed dispersal in the Malagasy tree Commiphora guillaumini. Ecology 80: 821832.
  • Bolmgren K, Eriksson O. 2005. Fleshy fruits – origins, niche shifts, and diversification. Oikos 109: 255272.
  • Bono JM, Heithaus ER. 2002. Sex ratios and the distribution of elaiosomes in colonies of the ant, Aphaenogaster rudis. Insectes Sociaux 49: 320325.
  • Boucher DH, James S, Keeler KH. 1982. The ecology of mutualism. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13: 315347.
  • Bronstein JL. 1994. Our current understanding of mutualism. Quarterly Review of Biology 69: 3151.
  • Bronstein JL. 1998. The contribution of ant–plant protection studies to our understanding of mutualism. Biotropica 30: 150161.
  • Bronstein JL. 2001. The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecology Letters 4: 277287.
  • Bronstein JL, Wilson WG, Morris WF. 2003. The ecological dynamics of mutualist–exploiter communities. American Naturalist 162: S24S39.
  • Bronstein JL, Dieckmann U, Ferrière R. 2004. Coevolutionary dynamics and the conservation of mutualism. In: FerrièreR, DieckmannU, CouvetD, eds. Evolutionary conservation biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 305326.
  • Brouat C, Garcia N, Andary C, McKey D. 2001a. Plant lock and ant key: pairwise coevolution of an exclusion filter in an ant-plant mutualism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 268: 21312141.
  • Brouat C, Gielly L, McKey D. 2001b. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Leonardoxa (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) inferred from chloroplast trnL intron and trnL–trnF intergenic spacer sequences. American Journal of Botany 88: 143149.
  • Bull JJ, Rice WR. 1991. Distinguishing mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 149: 6374.
  • Caruso CM. 2000. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 54: 15461557.
  • Cohen D, Shmida A. 1993. The evolution of flower display and reward. Evolutionary Biology 27: 197243.
  • Cook JM, Rasplus J-Y. 2003. Mutualists with attitude: coevolving fig wasps and figs. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 241248.
  • Cook JM, Bean D, Power SA, Dixon DJ. 2004. Evolution of a complex coevolved trait: active pollination in a genus of fig wasps. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 238246.
  • Crane PR, Friis EM, Pedersen KR. 1995. The origin and early diversification of angiosperms. Nature 374: 2733.
  • Crepet WC. 1996. Timing in the evolution of derived floral characters: Upper Cretaceous (Turonian) taxa with tricolpate and tricolpate-derived pollen. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 90: 339359.
  • Culley TM, Weller SG, Sakai AK. 2002. The evolution of wind pollination in angiosperms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 361369.
  • Cushman JH, Beattie AJ. 1991. Mutualisms: assessing the benefits to hosts and visitors. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6: 193195.
  • Darwin CD. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.
  • Darwin CD. 1876. The effects of cross- and self-fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. London: John Murray.
  • Davidson DW. 1997. The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 61: 153181.
  • Davidson DW, Epstein WW. 1989. Epiphytic associations with ants. In: LüttgeU, ed. Vascular plants as epiphytes. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 200233.
  • Davidson DW, McKey D. 1993. The evolutionary ecology of symbiotic ant–plant relationships. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 2: 1383.
  • Davies SJ, Lum SKY, Chan R, Wang LK. 2001. Evolution of myrmecophytism in western Malesian Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae). Evolution 55: 15421559.
  • Debout G, Provost E, Renucci M, Tirard A, Schatz B, McKey D. 2003. Colony structure in a plant-ant: behavioural, chemical and genetic study of polydomy in Cataulacus mckeyi (Myrmicinae). Oecologia 137: 195204.
  • Del-Claro K, Oliveira PS. 1993. Ant–Homoptera interaction: do alternative sugar sources distract tending ants? Oikos 68: 202206.
  • Doebeli M, Knowlton N. 1998. The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95: 86768680.
  • Eckert CG, Samis KE, Dart S. 2006. Reproductive assurance and the evolution of uniparental reproduction in flowering plants. In: HarderLD, BarrettSCH, eds. The ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 183203.
  • Egerton FN. 1973. Changing concepts of the balance of nature. Quarterly Review of Biology 48: 322350.
  • Egerton FN. 1977. A bibliographical guide to the history of general ecology and population ecology. History of Science 15: 189215.
  • Elias TS. 1983. Extrafloral nectaries: their structure and distribution. In: BentleyB, EliasT, eds. The biology of nectaries. New York: Columbia University Press, 174203.
  • Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35: 375403.
  • Ferrière R, Bronstein JL, Rinaldi S, Law R, Gauduchon M. 2002. Cheating and the evolutionary stability of mutualism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 269: 773780.
  • Fiala B, Maschwitz U. 1992. Food bodies and their significance for obligate ant association in the tree genus Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 110: 6175.
  • Fiala B, Grunsky H, Maschwitz U, Linsemair KE. 1994. Diversity of ant–plant interactions: protective efficacy in Macaranga species with different degrees of ant protection. Oecologia 97: 186192.
  • Folgarait PJ, Davidson DW. 1994. Antiherbivore defenses of myrmecophytic Cecropia under different light regimes. Oikos 71: 305320.
  • Folgarait PJ, Davidson DW. 1995. Myrmecophytic Cecropia: antiherbivore defenses under different nutrient treatments. Oecologia 104: 189206.
  • Frank SA. 1995. The origin of synergistic symbiosis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 176: 403410.
  • Galen C. 1989. Measuring pollinator-mediated selection on morphometric floral traits: bumblebees and the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 43: 882890.
  • Galen C. 1996. Rates of floral evolution: adaptation to bumblebee pollination in an alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 50: 120125.
  • Galen C, Cuba J. 2001. Down the tube: pollinators, predators, and the evolution of flower shape in the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 55: 19631971.
  • Gammans N, Bullock JM, Schonrogge K. 2005. Ant benefits in a seed dispersal mutualism. Oecologia 146: 4349.
  • Gaume L, McKey D, Terrin S. 1998. Ant–plant–homopteran mutualism: how the third partner affects the interaction between a plant-specialist ant and its myrmecophyte host. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 265: 569575.
  • Geber MA, Moeller D. 2006. Pollinator responses to plant communities and implications for reproductive character evolution. In: HarderLD, BarrettSCH, eds. The ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 102119.
  • Giladi I. 2006. Choosing benefits or partners: a review of the evidence for the evolution of myrmecochory. Oikos 112: 481492.
  • Goldblatt P, Manning JC, Bernhardt P. 1998. Adaptive radiation of bee-pollinated Gladiolus species (Iridaceae) in southern Africa. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 492517.
  • Gómez C, Espalader X. 1998. Aphaenogaster senilis Mayr (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): a possible parasite in the myrmecochory of Euphorbia characias (Euphorbiaceae). Sociobiology 32: 441450.
  • Gómez JM, Zamora R. 2006. Ecological factors that promote generalization in pollination systems. In: WaserNM, OllertonJ, eds. Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 145166.
  • Gomulkiewicz R, Nuismer SL, Thompson JN. 2003. Coevolution when a mutualism is not always a mutualism. American Naturalist 162: S80S93.
  • Grant V, Grant K. 1965. Flower pollination in the Phlox family. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Grimaldi D. 1999. The co-radiation of pollinating insects and angiosperms in the Cretaceous. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 373406.
  • Grimaldi D, Engel MS. 2005. Evolution of the insects. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Guimarães PR, Rico-Gray V, Furtado dos Reis S, Thompson JN. 2006. Asymmetries in specialization in ant-plant networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 273: 20412047.
  • Hammerstein P, ed. 2003. Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
  • Heil M, McKey D. 2003. Protective ant–plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 34: 425453.
  • Heil M, Fiala B, Kaiser W, Linsenmair KE. 1998. Chemical contents of Macaranga food bodies: adaptations to their role in ant attraction and nutrition. Functional Ecology 12: 117122.
  • Heil M, Staehelin C, McKey D. 2000. Low chitinase activity in Acacia myrmecophytes: a potential trade-off between biotic and chemical defenses? Naturwissenschaften 87: 555558.
  • Heil M, Hilpert A, Fiala B, Linsenmair KE. 2001. Nutrient availability and indirect (biotic) defence in a Malaysian ant-plant. Oecologia 126: 404408.
  • Heil M, Delsinne T, Hilpert Schurkens AS, Andary C, Linsenmair KE, Sousa MS, McKey D. 2002. Reduced chemical defence in ant-plants? A critical re-evaluation of a widely accepted hypothesis. Oikos 99: 457468.
  • Heil M, Greiner S, Meimberg H, Krüger R, Noyer JL, Heubl G, Linsenmair KE, Boland W. 2004a. Evolutionary change from induced to constitutive expression of an indirect plant resistance. Nature 430: 205208.
  • Heil M, Baumann B, Kruger R, Linsenmair K. 2004b. Main nutrient compounds in food bodies of Mexican Acacia ant-plants. Chemoecology 14: 4552.
  • Heil M, Rattke J, Boland W. 2005. Post-secretory hydrolysis of nectar sucrose and specialization in ant/plant mutualism. Science 308: 560563.
  • Herrera CM. 1996. Floral traits and plant adaptation to insect pollinators: a devil's advocate approach. In: LloydDG, BarrettSCH, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated systems. New York: Chapman & Hall, 6587.
  • Hochberg ME, Gomulkiewicz R, Holt RD, Thompson JN. 2000. Weak sinks could cradle mutualistic symbioses – strong sources should harbour parasitic symbioses. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 213222.
  • Hodges SA. 1997. Floral nectar spurs and diversification. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158: S81S88.
  • Hoeksema JD, Bruna EM. 2000. Pursuing the big questions about interspecific mutualism: a review of theoretical approaches. Oecologia 125: 321330.
  • Hoeksema JD, Schwartz MW. 2003. Expanding comparative-advantage biological market models: contingency of mutualism on partners’ resource requirements and acquisition trade-offs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 270: 913919.
  • Holland JN, DeAngelis DL. 2002. Ecological and evolutionary conditions for fruit abortion to regulate pollinating seed-eaters and increase plant reproduction. Theoretical Population Biology 61: 251263.
  • Hughes L, Westoby M. 1992. Effect of diaspore characteristics on removal of seeds adapted for dispersal by ants. Ecology 73: 13001312.
  • Hughes L, Westoby M, Johnson AD. 1993. Nutrient costs of vertebrate- and ant-dispersed fruits. Functional Ecology 7: 5462.
  • Hughes L, Westoby M, Jurado E. 1994. Convergence of elaiosomes and insect prey: evidence from ant foraging behaviour and fatty acid composition. Functional Ecology 8: 358365.
  • Irwin RE. 2003. Impact of nectar robbing on estimates of pollen flow: conceptual predictions and empirical outcomes. Ecology 84: 485495.
  • Irwin RE, Maloof JE. 2002. Variation in nectar robbing over time, space and species. Oecologia 133: 525533.
  • Irwin RE, Brody AK, Waser NM. 2001. The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities. Oecologia 129: 161168.
  • Janzen DH. 1966. Co-evolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution 20: 249275.
  • Janzen DH. 1967. Interaction of the bull's horn acacia (Acacia cornigera L.) with an ant inhabitant (Pseudomyrmex ferruginea F. Smith) in eastern Mexico. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 47: 315558.
  • Janzen DH. 1973. Dissolution of mutualism between Cecropia and its Azteca ant. Biotropica 5: 1528.
  • Johnson SD. 1994. Evidence for Batesian mimicry in a butterfly-pollinated orchid. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 24: 225235.
  • Johnson SD, Steiner KE. 2000. Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 140143.
  • Johnson SD, Linder HP, Steiner KE. 1998. Phylogeny and radiation of pollination systems in Disa (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 402411.
  • Johnson SD, Alexandersson R, Linder HP. 2003a. Experimental and phylogenetic evidence for floral mimicry in a guild of fly-pollinated plants. Biological Journal of the Linnaen Society 80: 289304.
  • Johnson SD, Peter CI, Nilsson LA, Agren J. 2003b. Pollination success in a deceptive orchid is enhanced by co-occurring rewarding magnet plants. Ecology 84: 29192927.
  • Jordano P. 1995. Angiosperm fleshy fruits and seed dispersers: a comparative analysis of adaptation and constraints in plant–animal interactions. American Naturalist 145: 163190.
  • Jordano P, Bascompte J, Olesen JM. 2006. The ecological consequences of complex topology and nested structure in pollination webs. In: WaserNM, OllertonJ, eds. Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 173199.
  • Keeler KH. 1980. Distribution of plants with extrafloral nectaries in temperate communities. American Midland Naturalist 104: 274280.
  • Keeler KH. 1984. Extrafloral nectaries on plants in communities without ants: Hawaii. Oikos 44: 407414.
  • Kerdelhue C, Le Clainche I, Rasplus JY. 1999. Molecular phylogeny of the Ceratosolen species pollinating Ficus of the subgenus Sycomorus sensu stricto: biogeographical history and origins of the species-specificity breakdown cases. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11: 401414.
  • Kerner A. 1878. Flowers and their unbidden guests. London: C. Kegan Paul & Co.
  • Kiester AR, Lande R, Schemske DW. 1984. Models of coevolution and speciation in plants and their pollinators. American Naturalist 124: 220243.
  • King G. 1888. The species of Ficus of the Indo-Malayan and Chinese countries. Annals of Review of Botanical Garden Calcutta 1: 1185.
  • Knuth P. 1906. Handbook of flower pollination I. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  • Koptur S. 1979. Facultative mutualism between weedy vetches bearing extrafloral nectaries and weedy ants in California. American Journal of Botany 66: 10161020.
  • Koptur S. 1992. Extrafloral nectary-mediated interactions between insects and plants. In: BernaysE, ed. Insect–plant interactions, Vol. IV. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 81129.
  • Labandeira CC. 1997. Insect mouthparts: ascertaining the paleobiology of insect feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 153193.
  • Labandeira CC. 1998. Early history of arthropod and vascular plant associations. Annual Review of Earth Planetary Sciences 26: 329377.
  • Lanza J, Schmitt MA, Awad AB. 1992. Comparative chemistry of elaiosomes of three species of Trillium. Journal of Chemical Ecology 18: 209221.
  • Laverty TM. 1992. Plant interactions for pollinator visits: a test for magnet species effect. Oecologia 89: 502508.
  • Law R, Koptur S. 1986. On the evolution of non-specific mutualism. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 27: 251267.
  • Law R, Bronstein JL, Ferrière RG. 2001. On mutualists and exploiters: plant–insect coevolution in pollinating seed–parasite systems. Journal of Theoretical Biology 212: 373389.
  • Letourneau DK. 1990. Code of ant–plant mutualism broken by parasite. Science 248: 215217.
  • Levey DJ, Byrne MM. 1993. Complex ant–plant interactions: rain forest ants as secondary dispersers and post-dispersal seed predators. Ecology 74: 18021812.
  • Linsenmair KE, Heil M, Kaiser WM, Fiala B, Koch T, Boland W. 2001. Adaptations to biotic and abiotic stress: Macaranga-ant plants optimize investment in biotic defence. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 20572065.
  • Machado CA, Robbins N, Gilbert MTP, Herre EA. 2005. Critical review of host specificity and its coevolutionary implications in the fig/fig-wasp mutualism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 65586565.
  • Maloof JE. 2001. The effects of a bumble bee nectar robber on plant reproductive success and pollinator behavior. American Journal of Botany 88: 19601965.
  • Maloof JE, Inouye DW. 2000. Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists? Ecology 81: 26512661.
  • Maschwitz U, Fiala B. 1995. Investigations on ant–plant associations in the South-East-Asian genus Neonauclea Merr. (Rubiaceae). Acta Oecologica 16: 318.
  • McKey D. 1989. Interactions between ants and leguminous plants. In: StirtonCH, ZaracchiJL, eds. Advances in legume biology. Monographs in Systematic Botany of the Missouri Botanical Gardens. Saint Louis, MO, USA: Missouri Botanical Gardens, 673718.
  • Meunier L, Dalecky A, Berticat C, Gaume L, McKey D. 1999. Worker size variation and the evolution of an ant–plant mutualism: comparative morphometrics of workers of two closely related plant-ants, Petalomyrmex phylax and Aphomomyrmex afer (Formicinae). Insectes Sociaux 46: 171178.
  • Michener CD. 2000. The bees of the world. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Moeller DA. 2004. Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology 85: 32893301.
  • Moeller DA, Geber MA. 2005. Ecological context of the evolution of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana: population size, plant communities, and reproductive assurance. Evolution 59: 786799.
  • Mondor EB, Addicott JF. 2003. Conspicuous extra-floral nectaries are inducible in Vicia faba. Ecology Letters 6: 495497.
  • Morales MA, Heithaus ER. 1998. Food from seed-dispersal mutualism shifts sex ratios in colonies of the ant Aphenogaster rudis. Ecology 79: 734739.
  • Müller A. 1996. Host-plant specialization in Western Palearctic Anthidiine bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Megachilidae). Ecological Monographs 66: 235257.
  • Müller H. 1883. The fertilisation of flowers. London: Macmillan.
  • Ness JH. 2003. Contrasting exotic Solenopsis invicta and native Forelius pruinosus ants as mutualists with Catalpa bignonioides, a native plant. Ecological Entomology 28: 247251.
  • Ness JH. 2006. A mutualism's indirect costs: the most aggressive plant bodyguards also deter pollinators. Oikos 113: 506514.
  • Ness JH, Bressmer K. 2005. Abiotic influences on the behaviour of rodents, ants, and plants affect an ant–seed mutualism. Ecoscience 12: 7681.
  • Ness JH, Bronstein JL. 2004. The effects of invasive ants on prospective ant mutualists. Biological Invasions 6: 445461.
  • Ness JH, Bronstein JL, Andersen AN, Holland JN. 2004. Ant body size predicts dispersal distance of ant-adapted seeds: implications of small-ant invasions. Ecology 85: 12441250.
  • Nilsson LA. 1988. The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes. Nature 334: 147149.
  • Noë R. 2001. Biological markets: partner choice as the driving force behind the evolution of mutualisms. In: NoëR, Van HooffR, HammersteinP, eds. Economics in nature: the evolutionary biology of economic behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 93118.
  • Nuismer SL, Thompson JN, Gomulkiewicz R. 1999. Gene flow and geographically structured coevolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 266: 605609.
  • O'Dowd DJ. 1979. Foliar nectar production and ant activity on a neotropical tree, Ochroma pyramidale. Oecologia 43: 233248.
  • O'Dowd DJ. 1982. Pearl bodies as ant food: an ecological role for some leaf emergences of tropical plants. Biotropica 14: 4049.
  • Ollerton J. 1998. Sunbird surprise for syndromes. Nature 394: 726727.
  • Pellmyr O. 2003. Yuccas, yucca moths, and coevolution: a review. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90: 3555.
  • Pellmyr O, Krenn HW. 2002. Origin of a complex key innovation in an obligate insect–plant mutualism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 54985502.
  • Pemberton RW. 1992. Fossil extrafloral nectaries, evidence for the ant-guard antiherbivore defense in an Oligocene Populus. American Journal of Botany 79: 12421246.
  • Pemberton RW, Lee J-H. 1996. The influence of extrafloral nectaries on parasitism of an insect herbivore. American Journal of Botany 83: 11871194.
  • Price MV, Waser NM, Irwin RE, Campbell DR, Brody AK. 2005. Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study. Ecology 86: 21062116.
  • Quek SP, Davies SJ, Itino T, Pierce NE. 2004. Codiversification in an ant-plant mutualism: stem texture and the evolution of host use in Crematogaster (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) inhabitants of Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae). Evolution 58: 554570.
  • Raguso RA. 2004. Flowers as sensory billboards: progress towards an integrated understanding of floral advertisement. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7: 434440.
  • Raine NE, Willmer P, Stone GN. 2002. Spatial structuring and floral avoidance behavior prevent ant–pollinator conflict in a Mexican ant-acacia. Ecology 83: 30863096.
  • Raine NE, Gammans N, Macfadyen IJ, Scrivner GK, Stone GN. 2004. Guards and thieves: antagonistic interactions between two ant species coexisting on the same ant-plant. Ecological Entomology 29: 345352.
  • Rashbrook VK, Compton SG, Lawton JH. 1992. Ant–herbivore interactions: reasons for the absence of benefits to a fern with foliar nectaries. Ecology 73: 21672174.
  • Rasplus JY, Kerdelhue C, Le Clainche I, Mondor G. 1998. Molecular phylogeny of fig wasps Agaonidae are not monophyletic. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences Serie III –Science de la Vie 321: 517527.
  • Rehr SS, Feeny P, Janzen DH. 1973. Chemical defense in Central American non-ant-acacias. Journal of Animal Ecology 42: 405416.
  • Ren D. 1998. Flower associated Brachycera flies as fossil evidence for Jurassic angiosperm origins. Science 280: 8588.
  • Renner SS. 2006. Rewardless flowers in the angiosperms and the role of insect cognition in their evolution. In: WaserNM, OllertonJ, eds. Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 123144.
  • Richardson SC. 2004. Are nectar-robbers mutualists or antagonists? Oecologia 139: 246254.
  • Rickson RF. 1977. Progressive loss of ant-related traits of Cecropia peltata on selected Caribbean islands. American Journal of Botany 64: 585592.
  • Riley CV. 1892. The yucca moth and yucca pollination. Report of the Missouri Botanical Garden 3: 99159.
  • Robertson C. 1895. The philosophy of flower seasons, and the phenological relations of the entomophilous flora and the anthophilous insect fauna. American Naturalist 29: 97117.
  • Rudgers JA. 2004. Enemies of herbivores can shape plant traits: selection in a facultative ant-plant mutualism. Ecology 85: 192205.
  • Rudgers JA, Strauss SY, Wendel JE. 2004.Trade-offs among anti-herbivore resistance traits: insights from Gossypieae (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 91: 871880.
  • Sabelis MW, Baalen MV, Bruin J, Egas M, Jansen VAA, Janssen A, Pels B. 1999. The evolution of overexploitation and mutualism in plant–herbivore–predator interactions and its impact on population dynamics. In: HawkinsBA, CornellHV, eds. Theoretical approaches to biology control. New York: Cambridge University Press, 259282.
  • Sachs JL, Mueller UG, Wilcox TP, Bull JJ. 2004. The evolution of cooperation. Quarterly Review of Biology 79: 135160.
  • Sakai S. 1993. A model for nectar secretion in animal-pollinated plants. Evolutionary Ecology 7: 394400.
  • Sapp J. 1994. Evolution by association: a history of symbiosis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Sargent RD. 2004. Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in angiosperms. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 271: 306308.
  • Schneider A. 1897. The phenomena of symbiosis. Minnesota Botanical Studies 1: 923948.
  • Schupp EW, Feener DH. 1991. Phylogeny, lifeform, and habitat dependence of ant-defended plants in a Panamanian forest. In: HuxleyCH, CutlerDF, eds. Ant–plant interactions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 175197.
  • Segraves KA, Pellmyr O. 2004. Testing the out-of-Florida hypothesis on the origin of cheating in the yucca–yucca moth mutualism. Evolution 58: 22662279.
  • Sipes SD, Tepedino VJ. 2005. Pollen-host specificity and evolutionary patterns of host switching in a clade of specialist bees (Apoidea: Diadasia). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 86: 487505.
  • Stanton ML. 2003. Interacting guilds: moving beyond the pairwise perspective on mutualisms. American Naturalist 162: S10S23.
  • Stanton ML, Palmer TM, Young TP, Evans A, Turner ML. 1999. Sterilization and canopy modification of a swollen thorn acacia tree by a plant-ant. Nature 401: 578581.
  • Stebbins GL. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Steiner KE, Whitehead VB. 1990. Pollinator adaptations to oil secreting flowers –Ridiviva and Diascia. Evolution 44: 17011707.
  • Steiner KE, Whitehead VB. 1991. Oil flowers and oil bees: further evidence for pollinator adaptation. Evolution 45: 14931501.
  • Thien LB, Azuma H, Kawano S. 2000. New perspectives on the pollination biology of basal angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Science 161: S225S235.
  • Thompson JN. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
  • Tiffney BH. 2004. Vertebrate dispersal of seed plants through time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35: 129.
  • Tillberg CV. 2004. Friend or foe? A behavioral and stable isotopic investigation of an ant–plant symbiosis. Oecologia 140: 506515.
  • Treseder K, Davidson DW, Ehleringer JR. 1995. Absorption of ant-provided carbon dioxide and nitrogen by a tropical epiphyte. Nature 375: 137139.
  • Vander Wall SB, Longland WS. 2004. Diplochory: are two seed dispersers better than one? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 155161.
  • Vázquez DP, Aizen MA. 2004. Asymmetric specialization: a pervasive feature of plant–pollinator interactions. Ecology 85: 12511257.
  • Vázquez DP, Aizen MA. 2006. Community-wide patterns of specialization in plant–pollinator interactions revealed by null models. In: WaserNM, OllertonJ, eds. Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 200219.
  • Wäckers FL, Bezemer TM. 2003. Root herbivory induces an above-ground indirect defence. Ecology Letters 6: 912.
  • Wagner D. 2000. Pollen viability reduction as a potential cost of ant association for Acacia constricta (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 711715.
  • Wagner D, Kay A. 2002. Do extrafloral nectaries distract ants from visiting flowers? An experimental test of an overlooked hypothesis. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4: 293305.
  • Waser NM. 1998. Pollination, angiosperm speciation, and the nature of species boundaries. Oikos 82: 198201.
  • Waser NM, Ollerton J , eds. 2006. Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
  • Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams NM, Ollerton J. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77: 10431060.
  • Wcislo WT, Cane JH. 1996. Floral resource utilization by solitary bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) and exploitation of their stored foods by natural enemies. Annual Review of Entomology 41: 257286.
  • Yu DW. 2001. Parasites of mutualisms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 72: 529546.
  • Yu DW, Davidson DW. 1997. Experimental studies of species-specificity in Cecropia–ant relationships. Ecological Monographs 67: 273294.
  • Yu DW, Pierce NE. 1998. A castration parasite of an ant–plant mutualism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 265: 375382.
  • Zettler JA, Spira TP, Allen CR. 2001. Ant–seed mutualisms: can red imported fire ants sour the relationship? Biological Conservation 101: 249253.