SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alpert P, Simms EL. 2002. The relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust? Evolutionary Ecology 16: 285297.
  • Anten NPR, Casado-Garcia R, Nagashima N. 2005. Effects of mechanical stress and plant density on mechanical characteristics, growth, and lifetime resproduction of tobacco plants. The American Naturalist 166: 650660.
  • Aphalo PJ, Ballare CL. 1995. On the importance of information-acquiring systems in plant–plant interactions. Functional Ecology 9: 514.
  • Ballare CL, Scopel AL, Jordan ET, Vierstra RD. 1994. Signaling among neighboring plants and the development of size inequalities in plant- populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91: 10 09410 098.
  • Bennington CC, Thayne WV. 1994. Use and misuse of mixed-model analysis of variance in ecological-studies. Ecology 75: 717722.
  • Bradshaw AD. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advanced Genetics 13: 115155.
  • Callahan HS, Dhanoolal N, Ungerer MC. 2005. Plasticity genes and plasticity costs: a new approach using an Arabidopsis recombinant inbred population. New Phytologist 166: 129139.
  • Cipollini DE, Schultz JC. 1999. Exploring cost constraints on stem elongation in plants using phenotypic manipulation. American Naturalist 153: 236242.
  • DeWitt TJ, Sih A, Wilson DS. 1998. Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 7781.
  • Donohue K, Messiqua D, Pyle EH, Heschel MS, Schmitt J. 2000. Evidence of adaptive divergence in plasticity: density- and site-dependent selection on shade-avoidance responses in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 54: 19561968.
  • Dorn LA, Pyle EH, Schmitt J. 2000. Plasticity to light cues and resources in Arabidopsis thaliana: testing for adaptive value and costs. Evolution 54: 19821994.
  • Dudley SA, Schmitt J. 1996. Testing the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: density-dependent selection on manipulated stem length in Impatiens capensis. American Naturalist 147: 445465.
  • Fischer M, Van Kleunen M, Schmid B. 2004. Experimental life-history evolution: selection on growth form and its plasticity in a clonal plant. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 331341.
  • Geber MA, Griffen LR. 2003. Inheritance and natural selection on functional traits. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: S21S42.
  • Givnish TJ. 2002. Ecological constraints on the evolution of plasticity in plants. Evolutionary Ecology 16: 213242.
  • Gustine DL, Sanderson MA. 2001. Molecular analysis of white clover population structure in grazed swards during two growing seasons. Crop Science 41: 11431149.
  • Hay MJM, Newton PCD, Robin C, Cresswell A. 2001. Branching responses of a plagiotropic clonal herb to localised incidence of light simulating that reflected from vegetation. Oecologia 127: 185190.
  • He WM, Zhang H, Dong M. 2004. Plasticity in fitness and fitness-related traits at ramet and genet levels in a tillering grass Panicum miliaceum under patchy soil nutrients. Plant Ecology 172: 110.
  • Henry HAL, Thomas SC. 2002. Interactive effects of lateral shade and wind on stem allometry, biomass allocation, and mechanical stability in Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 16091615.
  • Van Hinsberg A. 1997. Morphological variation in Plantago lanceolata L. effects of light quality and growth regulators on sun and shade populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 10: 687701.
  • Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agriculural Experimental Station Circular 347: 132.
  • Huber H, During HJ. 2000. No long-term costs of meristem allocation to flowering in stoloniferous Trifolium species. Evolutionary Ecology 14: 731748.
  • Huber H, Hutchings MJ. 1997. Differential response to shading in orthotropic and plagiotropic shoots of the clonal herb Glechoma hirsuta. Oecologia 112: 485491.
  • Huber H, Wiggerman L. 1997. Shade avoidance in the clonal herb Trifolium fragiferum: a field study with experimentally manipulated vegetation height. Plant Ecology 130: 5362.
  • Van Kleunen M, Fischer M. 2005. Constraints on the evolution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in plants. New Phytologist 166: 4960.
  • De Kroon H, Hutchings MJ. 1995. Morphological plasticity in clonal plants – the foraging concept reconsidered. Journal of Ecology 83: 143152.
  • Lande R, Arnold SJ. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 12101226.
  • Leeflang L, During HJ, Werger MJA. 1998. The role of petioles in light acquisition by Hydrocotyle vulgaris L. in a vertical light gradient. Oecologia 117: 235238.
  • Pierik R, Visser EJW, De Kroon H, Voesenek LACJ. 2003. Ethylene is required in tobacco to successfully compete with proximate neighbours. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 12291234.
  • Pigliucci M. 2005. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 481486.
  • Pigliucci M, Pollard H, Cruzan MB. 2003. Comparative studies of evolutionary responses to light environments in Arabidopsis. American Naturalist 161: 6882.
  • Poulton J, Winn AA. 2002. Costs of canalization and plasticity in response to neighbors in Brassica rapa. Plant Species Biology 17: 109118.
    Direct Link:
  • Relyea RA. 2002. Costs of phenotypic plasticity. American Naturalist 159: 272282.
  • Scheiner SM. 1993a. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 3568.
  • Scheiner SM. 1993b. Plasticity as a selectable trait – reply to Via. American Naturalist 142: 371373.
  • Scheiner SM. 2001. manova. In: ScheinerSM, GurevitchJ, eds. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 99115.
  • Scheiner SM. 2002. Selection experiments and the study of phenotypic plasticity. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 889898.
  • Scheiner SM, Berrigan D. 1998. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. VIII. The cost of plasticity in Daphnia pulex. Evolution 52: 368378.
  • Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M. 1993. Control of phenotypic plasticity via regulatory genes. American Naturalist 142: 366370.
  • Schmitt J. 1997. Is photomorphogenic shade avoidance adaptive? Perspectives from population biology. Plant, Cell & Environment 20: 826830.
  • Schmitt J, Stinchcombe JR, Heschel MS, Huber H. 2003. The adaptive evolution of plasticity: phytochrome-mediated shade avoidance responses. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43: 459469.
  • Schmitt J, Wulff RD. 1993. Light spectral quality, phytochrome and plant competition. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 4751.
  • Stuefer JF, Van Hulzen JB, During HJ. 2002. A genotypic trade-off between the number and size of clonal offspring in the stoloniferous herb Potentilla reptans. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 880884.
  • Sultan SE. 1987. Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Evolutionary Ecology 21: 127178.
  • Sultan SE. 1995. Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 44: 363383.
  • Sultan SE. 2005. An emerging focus on plant ecological development. New Phytologist 166: 15.
  • Sultan SE, Bazzaz FA. 1993. Phenotypic plasticity in polygonum-persicaria. 3. The evolution of ecological breadth for nutrient environment. Evolution 47: 10501071.
  • Sultan SE, Spencer HG. 2002. Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. American Naturalist 160: 271283.
  • Van Tienderen PH. 1991. Evolution of generalists and specialists in spatially heterogeneous environments. Evolution 45: 13171331.
  • Turkington R, Burdon JJ. 1983. The biology of Canadian weeds. 57. Trifolium-repens L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 63: 243266.
  • Via S. 1993. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity – target or by-product of selection in a variable environment? American Naturalist 142: 352365.
  • Via S, Gomulkiewicz R, De Jong G, Scheiner SM, Schlichting CD, Van Tienderen PH. 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity – consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 212217.
  • Weinig C. 2000. Plasticity versus canalization: population differences in the timing of shade-avoidance responses. Evolution 54: 441451.
  • Wijesinghe DK, Hutchings MJ. 1999. The effects of environmental heterogeneity on the performance of Glechoma hederacea: the interactions between patch contrast and patch scale. Journal of Ecology 87: 860872.
  • Yano S, Terashima I. 2004. Developmental process of sun and shade leaves in Chenopodium album L. Plant, Cell & Environment 27: 781793.